-
13-10-2023, 07:46 PM
#121
Re: Nick Coffield nominates Bulldogs
Originally Posted by
G-Mo77
Why? How?
Because when we played Geelong late in the year he posted that we should offer unconditional support for the duration...than 10 minutes later criticised the coach for the Tom Stewart match-up. I replied saying:
Tweet 1- We should all offer unconditional support.
Tweet 2 - criticise the coach.
...and was blocked basically immediately. No abuse, no inappropriate language...anyhoooooo
What should I tell her? She's going to ask.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 3 Likes
-
13-10-2023, 07:55 PM
#122
Re: Nick Coffield nominates Bulldogs
Originally Posted by
mjp
Because when we played Geelong late in the year he posted that we should offer unconditional support for the duration...than 10 minutes later criticised the coach for the Tom Stewart match-up. I replied saying:
Tweet 1- We should all offer unconditional support.
Tweet 2 - criticise the coach.
...and was blocked basically immediately. No abuse, no inappropriate language...anyhoooooo
It's no Footscray Bulldogs Fanboy.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 4 Likes
-
13-10-2023, 07:58 PM
#123
Re: Nick Coffield nominates Bulldogs
Originally Posted by
mjp
Because when we played Geelong late in the year he posted that we should offer unconditional support for the duration...than 10 minutes later criticised the coach for the Tom Stewart match-up. I replied saying:
Tweet 1- We should all offer unconditional support.
Tweet 2 - criticise the coach.
...and was blocked basically immediately. No abuse, no inappropriate language...anyhoooooo
That's pretty funny.
They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.
-
13-10-2023, 09:09 PM
#124
Re: Nick Coffield nominates Bulldogs
Originally Posted by
Rocco Jones
It's no Footscray Bulldogs Fanboy.
"Better looking than expected"
-
13-10-2023, 09:31 PM
#125
Re: Nick Coffield nominates Bulldogs
HUN:
Dogs likely to get Coffield for second/third round swap.
Dogs likely to get 49 for Sweet.
Let?s say worst case it?s just one third back from Aints, Pick 56
Then:
48 - 302
49 - 287 (589)
53 - 233 (822)
56 - 194 (1,016)
69 - 49 (1,065)
72 & 75 traded or thrown away
= Croft at basically Pick 10. If he slides, that?s the points if Lual becomes a live option.
Also, as GCS have a ton of lower picks to burn as they match bids our picks will slightly increase. Maybe only 100-130 points overall, but increase none the less.
We need 6 list spots open. So I’m assuming Croz & Bedendo will join McLean in the our column.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 2 Likes
josie thanked for this post
-
13-10-2023, 09:34 PM
#126
Re: Nick Coffield nominates Bulldogs
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
HUN:
Dogs likely to get Coffield for second/third round swap.
Dogs likely to get 49 for Sweet.
Let?s say worst case it?s just one third back from Aints, Pick 56
Then:
48 - 302
49 - 287 (589)
53 - 233 (822)
56 - 194 (1,016)
69 - 49 (1,065)
72 & 75 traded or thrown away
= Croft at basically Pick 10. If he slides, that?s the points if Lual becomes a live option.
Do 72 and 75 have any points value BT?
Please and thank you.
They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.
-
13-10-2023, 09:40 PM
#127
Re: Nick Coffield nominates Bulldogs
Originally Posted by
Twodogs
Do 72 and 75 have any points value BT?
Please and thank you.
72 has just 19.
75 has none.
They might nudge up ever so fractionally. But we’d need to open up more list spots than we have, so I’d say we are not going to use them unless we are moving two rookie spots to the main list which would cost more money than the points would ever be worth.
So I’d say we would look to potentially trade them or just pass on them. For points purposes.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes
-
13-10-2023, 10:32 PM
#128
Re: Nick Coffield nominates Bulldogs
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
72 has just 19.
75 has none.
They might nudge up ever so fractionally. But we’d need to open up more list spots than we have, so I’d say we are not going to use them unless we are moving two rookie spots to the main list which would cost more money than the points would ever be worth.
So I’d say we would look to potentially trade them or just pass on them. For points purposes.
They don't NOW but on draft night after all the late picks get used on bids they might. 4th round last year ended up starting pick 60 didn't it?
-
13-10-2023, 10:34 PM
#129
Re: Nick Coffield nominates Bulldogs
Originally Posted by
hujsh
They don't NOW but on draft night after all the late picks get used on bids they might. 4th round last year ended up starting pick 60 didn't it?
By the time Croft is bid on (say 10-13) they won’t move drastically higher in points. By the end of the draft perhaps. But Power hasn’t indicated we are interested in drafting late. If there’s 55-60 picks as rumoured/projected, it matters little.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
13-10-2023, 10:55 PM
#130
Re: Nick Coffield nominates Bulldogs
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
72 has just 19.
75 has none.
They might nudge up ever so fractionally. But we’d need to open up more list spots than we have, so I’d say we are not going to use them unless we are moving two rookie spots to the main list which would cost more money than the points would ever be worth.
So I’d say we would look to potentially trade them or just pass on them. For points purposes.
So probably won't be useful for a Lual bid then?
They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.
-
13-10-2023, 10:59 PM
#131
Re: Nick Coffield nominates Bulldogs
Originally Posted by
Twodogs
So probably won't be useful for a Lual bid then?
I don’t think so. Lual needs to get to Pick 41 to be ours (218 points) but at Pick 56 is free. So say he gets to about 150 points. That could be bridged from as little as Croft going at 11 (not 10) and say two GCS bids before ours nudging our picks up. Both highly likely events.
I doubt anyone is interested in the picks is there’s only maybe 60 picks overall but who knows, maybe we can trade them out for a F4.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
13-10-2023, 11:05 PM
#132
Re: Nick Coffield nominates Bulldogs
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
I don’t think so. Lual needs to get to Pick 41 to be ours (218 points) but at Pick 56 is free. So say he gets to about 150 points. That could be bridged from as little as Croft going at 11 (not 10) and say two GCS bids before ours nudging our picks up. Both highly likely events.
I doubt anyone is interested in the picks is there’s only maybe 60 picks overall but who knows, maybe we can trade them out for a F4.
Trust in the Power of Sam
They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
14-10-2023, 12:22 AM
#133
Re: Nick Coffield nominates Bulldogs
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
By the time Croft is bid on (say 10-13) they won’t move drastically higher in points. By the end of the draft perhaps. But Power hasn’t indicated we are interested in drafting late. If there’s 55-60 picks as rumoured/projected, it matters little.
Might be relevant for latish points trades, even if not for Croft, or even matching a Lual bid should he fall that far.
-
14-10-2023, 12:54 AM
#134
Re: Nick Coffield nominates Bulldogs
Coffield could be a great fit for us. Can play on a range of opponents and that should be a positive. Third tall defender and having Naughton, Richards and Coffield from the same draft could set us up for a few years to come.
Doing my best to use emojis more frequently
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
14-10-2023, 08:21 AM
#135
Re: Nick Coffield nominates Bulldogs
Originally Posted by
Jasper
Coffield could be a great fit for us. Can play on a range of opponents and that should be a positive. Third tall defender and having Naughton, Richards and Coffield from the same draft could set us up for a few years to come.
Providing we can get him fit and he stays that way he should be able to slot into the side for us. 3 x 1st rounders doesn't happen often
There are a few gaps starting to appear in that draft group
#3 Paddy Dow is swapping teams after under-performing for the Blues
#6 Jaidyn Stephenson isn't meeting his potential and joined a 2nd club'
#7 Hunter Clark is an okay player but hasn't quite met his potential
#8 Nick Coffield looks very likely to land at the Kennel after missing 2 years of football
#10 Lockie O'Brien has been delisted by the Blues
#11 Aiden Bonner is in a holding pattern with North and might be delisted and it's his 2nd club
#13 Jarrod Brander is not on a list
#14 Matthew Ling is not on a list
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes