-
The Tom Boyd Trade - Three Years On
Tom Boyd:
40 Games (25 wins/15 losses), 36 Goals: Averages: 10.5 Disposals, 3.1 Marks, 2.5 Tackles, 10 Hit Outs - 4 Finals for 4 Wins - 100% (Inc. Premiership)
Ryan Gryphone:
39 Games (24 wins/15 losses), 16 Goals: Averages: 20.3 Disposls, 3.1 Marks, 4 Tackles, 1 Hit out - 2 Finals for 1 win, 1 Prelim Loss (50%) (Inc. No Premiership, and as a club no Grand Finals)
Misc:
- Tom's contract front loaded, so he's only on about $700,000.
- Tom was vital in winning a premiership.
- The draft pick GWS received, Caleb Marchbank, quit them too.
- Tom has 10-11 years left in his career to give to the WBFC. And a lot of potential still to unlock, he's a pup. Gryphone has one year on his contract/career left at GWS unless they pay him out.
Three years in, I think the media can and should call it: WBFC has officially won this trade. Or at least I will, and if GWS don't win it next year with Gryphone, then it will be a huge back fire on them.
Last edited by bulldogtragic; 24-09-2017 at 03:50 PM.
Reason: Typo
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: The Tom Boyd Trade - Three Years On
I'm with you. Griffin nearly done and Tom won't hit his straps til 24 onwards.
-
Re: The Tom Boyd Trade - Three Years On
Shhh. Don't tell Barrett that. You'll blow his fetid mind.
BORDERLINE FLYING
-
Re: The Tom Boyd Trade - Three Years On
We won the trade when we won the flag! if Boyd retires in the off season due to depression or struggles for the rest of his career we still win the trade. The question is by how far do we win the trade? the more Tom does the bigger the margin.
-
Re: The Tom Boyd Trade - Three Years On
Originally Posted by
anfo27
We won the trade when we won the flag! if Boyd retires in the off season due to depression or struggles for the rest of his career we still win the trade. The question is by how far do we win the trade? the more Tom does the bigger the margin.
Correct. I think what this shows is that if we lose a big player (who was/is under contract), if we nail the right player in return. We can turn a loss into a big gain.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Re: The Tom Boyd Trade - Three Years On
Can someone let these journos know so they can report we won the trade and they were all wrong AGAIN
Bring back the biff
-
Re: The Tom Boyd Trade - Three Years On
Originally Posted by
ledge
Can someone let these journos know so they can report we won the trade and they were all wrong AGAIN
The beauty is we don't have to do anything to tell them. The lazy parasites lurk here looking for stories although Robbo seems to have dropped off after we called him out on it a few times.
They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.
-
Re: The Tom Boyd Trade - Three Years On
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
Tom Boyd:
40 Games (25 wins/15 losses), 36 Goals: Averages: 10.5 Disposals, 3.1 Marks, 2.5 Tackles, 10 Hit Outs, 4 Finals for 4 Wins - 100% (Inc. Premiership)
Ryan Gryphone:
39 Games (24 wins/15 losses), 16 Goals: Averages: 20.3 Disposls, 3.1 Marks, 4 Tackles, 1 Hit out, 2 Finals for 1 win, 1 Prelim Loss (50%) (Inc. No Premiership, and as a club no Grand Finals)
Misc:
- Tom' contract front loaded, so he's only on about $700,000.
- Tom was vital in winning a premiership.
- The draft pick GWS received, Caleb Marchbank, quit them too.
- Tom has 10-11 years left in his career to give to the WBFC. And a lot of potential still to unlock, he's a pup. Gryphone has one year on his contract/career left at GWS unless they pay him out.
Three years in, I think the media can and should call it: WBFC has officially won this trade. Or at least I will, and if GWS don't win it next year with Gryphone, then it will be a huge back fire on them.
Serious question. Did Tom not play in the 2015 Elimination Final?
They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.
-
Re: The Tom Boyd Trade - Three Years On
Originally Posted by
Twodogs
Serious question. Did Tom not play in the 2015 Elimination Final?
Nope.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Re: The Tom Boyd Trade - Three Years On
Originally Posted by
Twodogs
The beauty is we don't have to do anything to tell them. The lazy parasites lurk here looking for stories although Robbo seems to have dropped off after we called him out on it a few times.
We can also add that his wage didn't destroy the club and no players left due to him coming. Oh and we had salary cap room due to forward thinking with which no journo actually looked at it realising we had extra due to not using it all in previous years.
Bring back the biff
-
Re: The Tom Boyd Trade - Three Years On
The worst trade in history
New idea gossip columnist Caroline Wilson .
It's how far we win by, is the story .
-
Re: The Tom Boyd Trade - Three Years On
Isn't it funny how journos say it takes a tall until he is 25 until he shows his full potential but then called out Boyd as a terrible trade at 20.
Bring back the biff
-
Re: The Tom Boyd Trade - Three Years On
I find it amazing when you look at Ty Vickery , his career, his contracts and his wage and nothing is said.
Bring back the biff
-
Re: The Tom Boyd Trade - Three Years On
If he never plays again we are still winners and so is Tom (just need to close my eyes and i can see the goal out of the center in the GF). Tho im sure he'll be back better than ever.
-
Re: The Tom Boyd Trade - Three Years On
We won the trade by a mile. You thought he was pretty good in the Granny, wait till he matures over the next few seasons.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.