-
Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 17 Vs Sydney Swans 2021
Originally Posted by
The Bulldogs Bite
We have some challenges. The ruck situation is a little dire again - not sure who Sydney rotates through minus Hickey, so maybe we can have a similar setup to today but we're not getting anything out of Tim. I'd bring in Sweet, especially with Naughton out.
Could Marra be any worse than Hannan?
Richards a good in.
In - Sweet, Marra, Richards
Out - Naughton, Hannan, Scott or Garcia - whoever is tired
I think Joel Amartey is the relief ruck at the moment - young 197cm forward.
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 17 Vs Sydney Swans 2021
Originally Posted by
Axe Man
I think Joel Amartey is the relief ruck at the moment - young 197cm forward.
Bulldog supporter.
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 17 Vs Sydney Swans 2021
Originally Posted by
Axe Man
I think Joel Amartey is the relief ruck at the moment - young 197cm forward.
And he’s looking pretty good.
I will never see #16 the same!!
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 17 Vs Sydney Swans 2021
In- Richards
Out- Naughton
Young to play fwd
I will never see #16 the same!!
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 17 Vs Sydney Swans 2021
Originally Posted by
DOG GOD
In- Richards
Out- Naughton
Young to play fwd
They also play a three prong tall forward line, so Young is needed in defense.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 17 Vs Sydney Swans 2021
Originally Posted by
bornadog
They also play a three prong tall forward line, so Young is needed in defense.
Ah ok. Haven’t watch much of Sydney this year.
I will never see #16 the same!!
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 17 Vs Sydney Swans 2021
Originally Posted by
DOG GOD
Ah ok. Haven’t watch much of Sydney this year.
They have Buddy, Blakey, and Amarty all over 195cm.
Having said that, does Young go forward, and Crozier comes in and plays tall? I don't actually like that option, but you never know.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 17 Vs Sydney Swans 2021
Originally Posted by
bornadog
They also play a three prong tall forward line, so Young is needed in defense.
Originally Posted by
bornadog
They have Buddy, Blakey, and Amarty all over 195cm.
Having said that, does Young go forward, and Crozier comes in and plays tall? I don't actually like that option, but you never know.
I believe Blakey has been playing back so if that's the third tall you are talking about I'm not sure it's accurate (I haven't watched the swans lately).
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 17 Vs Sydney Swans 2021
Originally Posted by
Axe Man
I believe Blakey has been playing back so if that's the third tall you are talking about I'm not sure it's accurate (I haven't watched the swans lately).
ok, you could be right. I thought he played more forward.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 17 Vs Sydney Swans 2021
If Blakey plays forward I’m sure Williams can cover him.
More of an In Bruges guy?
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 17 Vs Sydney Swans 2021
Originally Posted by
bornadog
ok, you could be right. I thought he played more forward.
Just going off Swans BF thread, which incidentally is about 90% whinging about the umpires and the 2016 grand final. They really need counselling, it's quite sad.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 3 Likes
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 17 Vs Sydney Swans 2021
Originally Posted by
Axe Man
Just going off Swans BF thread, which incidentally is about 90% whinging about the umpires and the 2016 grand final. They really need counselling, it's quite sad.
Upset with the goal review of JJs goal are they? Or that Rohan didn’t show up? Or Tippett got the day wrong and turned up Sunday? Or they couldn’t stop Tom Boyd?
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 17 Vs Sydney Swans 2021
Originally Posted by
Axe Man
Just going off Swans BF thread, which incidentally is about 90% whinging about the umpires and the 2016 grand final. They really need counselling, it's quite sad.
I hope you posted this:
"It's over. It's all over."
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 3 Likes
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 17 Vs Sydney Swans 2021
In: Marra/Schache (50/50 on them), Richards/Crozier (if Ed isn't right)
Out: Naughts, Scott
If Tobias needs a break, I guess he can be sub. Lip there too.
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 17 Vs Sydney Swans 2021
Hannan was alright yesterday, everyone saying Jamarra or Schache would be better underestimate Hannan's pace, marking and fitness
I would bring Sweet in and send English forward for Naughton
Richards back in for Scott
If you kicked five goals and Tom Boyd kicked five goals, Tom Boyd kicked more goals than you.
Formerly gogriff