AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • G-Mo77
    Bulldog Team of the Century
    • Apr 2007
    • 9894

    #61
    Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion

    He he he. Almost Horse, almost.

    [IMG]images.jpg[/IMG]

    Comment

    • Sedat
      Hall of Fame
      • Sep 2007
      • 11436

      #62
      Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion

      Would love the Dawks to scrounge together about 10-11 wins and a 10th placed finish
      "Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"

      Comment

      • Topdog
        Bulldog Team of the Century
        • Jan 2007
        • 7471

        #63
        Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion

        Originally posted by Sedat
        Would love the Dawks to scrounge together about 10-11 wins and a 10th placed finish
        I think they will get to 9. Probably finish 12th with that

        Comment

        • ledge
          Hall of Fame
          • Dec 2007
          • 14466

          #64
          Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion

          Lingy is impossible to listen to .. Firstly "Hawks have a young side" and they are the second oldest side this weekend.
          Secondly .."just a minor detail but that could be the difference" so it's not minor then is it !
          And if I hear Bruce say "that was Carey like" once more im going to spew up ! He only says it when Carey is calling with him, talk about suck job .
          My god he is terrible. Experts ?? Channel 7 is getting worse each week .
          Bring back the biff

          Comment

          • bulldogtragic
            The List Manager
            • Jan 2007
            • 34289

            #65
            Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion

            Originally posted by Sedat
            Would love the Dawks to scrounge together about 10-11 wins and a 10th placed finish
            Richmond 9th. St Kilda 8th.

            Perfect. T&T make it happen please.
            Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

            Comment

            • Sedat
              Hall of Fame
              • Sep 2007
              • 11436

              #66
              Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion

              Originally posted by bulldogtragic
              Richmond 9th. St Kilda 8th.

              Perfect. T&T make it happen please.
              And Norf 17th - nobody is touching Brisbane
              "Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"

              Comment

              • Sedat
                Hall of Fame
                • Sep 2007
                • 11436

                #67
                Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion

                Awesome kick into F50 by the Rising Star in the last couple of minutes. What would Caleb have done with that kick?
                "Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"

                Comment

                • Remi Moses
                  WOOF Member
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 14785

                  #68
                  Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion

                  Surprised to see Sydney allow Hawthorn to play that short uncontested style . Been their trademark
                  Heeney's shank was significant, as it sucked the air out of Sydney .
                  Burgoyne turned back time , and losing those two rotations hurt Sydney

                  Comment

                  • Twodogs
                    Moderator
                    • Nov 2006
                    • 27664

                    #69
                    Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion

                    Originally posted by aker39
                    It doesn't matter whether it's a mark or free kick. If the umpire thinks there is a delay in play, due to injury or the ball being knocked a distance away, they will signal time on. The shot clock person (which is not the timekeepers) will stop the 30 second clock on that signal and start it again when time off is signalled.

                    Last night, there was no need to signal time on, Dixon wasn't injured, he was just tired and took a while to get up, which ate in to his 30 seconds.

                    PS - If there is a mark and free kick to the same player, a free kick will always be paid, because advantage can not be paid after a mark.

                    I've been meaning to ask about that for a while. Cheers.


                    Originally posted by Topdog
                    I think they will get to 9. Probably finish 12th with that
                    Richmond please.

                    Originally posted by ledge
                    Lingy is impossible to listen to .. Firstly "Hawks have a young side" and they are the second oldest side this weekend.
                    Secondly .."just a minor detail but that could be the difference" so it's not minor then is it !
                    And if I hear Bruce say "that was Carey like" once more im going to spew up ! He only says it when Carey is calling with him, talk about suck job .
                    My god he is terrible. Experts ?? Channel 7 is getting worse each week .
                    He is the worst special comments guy I've ever heard. I can't think of anyone worse. Geoff Leek on the ABC maybe, he just said "Rubbish" and "hopeless" a lot. And Bruce going on about everybody being 'Carey like' when he's sitting next to him is plain weird.
                    They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

                    Comment

                    • soupman
                      Bulldog Team of the Century
                      • Nov 2007
                      • 5131

                      #70
                      Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion

                      Bruce these last two weeks has sunk to a new level of cringeworthy. Has there ever been a commentator tat makes such a huge deal about almost plays or insignificant marks?

                      Last night Hodge took an intercept mark at the back of the square at the start of the last quarter and Bruce went off about it being a "critical mark" and "telling play" (or something along those lines.

                      As for Ling, well I said it recently but he is the worst person in the entire football media. Under researched, says nothing, and when he does try and say something it's often poorly phrased (see his comments to martin about feeling that the side in front at the end would win), and incredibly and obviously biased.

                      Daisy Pearce took his spot on the Geelong match and was fantastic. Concise, clear and informative and her comments were about the game not fanboying over ex teammates.
                      I should leave it alone but you're not right

                      Comment

                      • Topdog
                        Bulldog Team of the Century
                        • Jan 2007
                        • 7471

                        #71
                        Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion

                        Originally posted by ledge
                        Lingy is impossible to listen to .. Firstly "Hawks have a young side" and they are the second oldest side this weekend.
                        .
                        Just so incredibly under prepared (researched) for each game. Its staggering that he can do it so consistently.

                        Comment

                        • Twodogs
                          Moderator
                          • Nov 2006
                          • 27664

                          #72
                          Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion

                          Originally posted by Topdog
                          Just so incredibly under prepared (researched) for each game. Its staggering that he can do it so consistently.
                          I'll bet that 7 are regretting whatever the length of the contract they signed him to is. Even if it's just this year it means they have to make a call on replacing him and braking up the "commentry team" or continue on fouling up a product they have payed billions for.

                          They must have given him a trial. Did they not notice that he yells rather than talks, that he has no idea about communicating football ideas or even understand what he's talking about and that he has a very annoying personality trait (he's a wanker). How did all that get past them?
                          They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

                          Comment

                          • jeemak
                            Bulldog Legend
                            • Oct 2010
                            • 21991

                            #73
                            Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion

                            Originally posted by Twodogs
                            I'll bet that 7 are regretting whatever the length of the contract they signed him to is. Even if it's just this year it means they have to make a call on replacing him and braking up the "commentry team" or continue on fouling up a product they have payed billions for.

                            They must have given him a trial. Did they not notice that he yells rather than talks, that he has no idea about communicating football ideas or even understand what he's talking about and that he has a very annoying personality trait (he's a wanker). How did all that get past them?
                            Everything that is wrong with AFL coverage can be pinned down to society being extremely dull and full of brain dead idiots. We're in a bit of an echo chamber on Woof, what we all think is second rate or substandard, is actually what a large portion of the football watching public wants to see.

                            I don't know why they want to see it, they just do.
                            TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.

                            Comment

                            • Remi Moses
                              WOOF Member
                              • Jan 2009
                              • 14785

                              #74
                              Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion

                              Bit like what they dish up on the box .
                              Ling just shits me, and reckon Daisy Pierce is a lot better option .
                              As for Basil.....

                              Comment

                              • Bornadog
                                WOOF Clubhouse Leader
                                • Jan 2007
                                • 67291

                                #75
                                Re: AFL Round 10, 2017 Discussion

                                I can't believe Adelaide had 43 shots at goal. Freo were woeful.
                                FFC: Established 1883

                                Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

                                Comment

                                Working...