Eade - Two year or Three Year Contract

[azabob]

Re: Eade - Two year or Three Year Contract

Question about injuries/selection wise for the future. Eade said there wasn't a lot they could do, said Moles was unlucky, but they were very limited to what they could do.


.

Good to see he is blaming injuries. Another cop out from all and sundry.

The amount of times Eade mentions the mental strength of this group and they will bounce back to me sounds like he doesn't even think they are mentally strong.

Not point having in's and out's section this week there will be no change.

[Desipura]

Re: Eade - Two year or Three Year Contract

Good to see he is blaming injuries. Another cop out from all and sundry.
Not point having in's and out's section this week there will be no change.

He and the MC should blame themselves for playing injured players.
I would have rather seen some kids gain some invaluable experience than watching a half fit Higgins go around. An ageing and slow Hahn, Eagleton and Johnson.
We were always going to get well beaten with guys playing half fit and players that are well and truly washed up as footballers, it would have been no different with youngsters, at least they can learn what finals footy is about.
Leats not kid ourselves and think we can play in Grand Final this year, lets pick a team for the next final with next year in mind.

[azabob]

Re: Eade - Two year or Three Year Contract

He and the MC should blame themselves for playing injured players.
I would have rather seen some kids gain some invaluable experience than watching a half fit Higgins go around. An ageing and slow Hahn, Eagleton and Johnson.
We were always going to get well beaten with guys playing half fit and players that are well and truly washed up as footballers, it would have been no different with youngsters, at least they can learn what finals footy is about.
Leats not kid ourselves and think we can play in Grand Final this year, lets pick a team for the next final with next year in mind.

Couldn't agree more but we know it won't happen.

[BornInDroopSt'54]

Re: Eade - Two year or Three Year Contract

He and the MC should blame themselves for playing injured players.
I would have rather seen some kids gain some invaluable experience than watching a half fit Higgins go around. An ageing and slow Hahn, Eagleton and Johnson.
We were always going to get well beaten with guys playing half fit and players that are well and truly washed up as footballers, it would have been no different with youngsters, at least they can learn what finals footy is about.
Leats not kid ourselves and think we can play in Grand Final this year, lets pick a team for the next final with next year in mind.

Who would you bring in and who would you drop, given that the aim is to win not just give young players experience?

[Desipura]

Re: Eade - Two year or Three Year Contract

Who would you bring in and who would you drop, given that the aim is to win not just give young players experience?

Pretty obvious who to take out I would have thought
Johnno - Hooper or even Hill (who has done nothing and is lazy, but can kick multiple goals). Is that worse than not being able to run at all?

Eagleton - Moles (wont gain much by picking Moles over Eagleton, but Moles at least gets his hands dirty.
Hahn - Anyone, Everitt.

[Mantis]

Re: Eade - Two year or Three Year Contract

Pretty obvious who to take out I would have thought
Johnno - Hooper or even Hill (who has done nothing and is lazy, but can kick multiple goals). Is that worse than not being able to run at all?

How does he create his goals?

[Desipura]

Re: Eade - Two year or Three Year Contract

How does he create his goals?

You tell me?

[Jasper]

Re: Eade - Two year or Three Year Contract

How does he create his goals?

Sitting at the back, not chasing and getting cheapies, not working hard enough to present....oh I see that was a rhetorical question

[Desipura]

Re: Eade - Two year or Three Year Contract

Sitting at the back, not chasing and getting cheapies, not working hard enough to present....oh I see that was a rhetorical question

The above sounds familiar to the current forwards in our side. Only differnece is Hill can take a contested mark. Look, I have no strong argument for Hill to come in the side.