-
MRP thread 2017
Varcoe 1 week ban for hit on Dahl
Full charges here
Last edited by bornadog; 28-03-2017 at 09:41 AM.
Reason: correct info
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: MRP thread 2017
Originally Posted by
bornadog
Varcoe 1 week ban for hit on JJ
Full charges
here
Says Dahlhaus not JJ
If you kicked five goals and Tom Boyd kicked five goals, Tom Boyd kicked more goals than you.
Formerly gogriff
-
Re: MRP thread 2017
Originally Posted by
boydogs
Says Dahlhaus not JJ
Thanks - not sure why I wrote JJ.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: MRP thread 2017
Originally Posted by
bornadog
Thanks - not sure why I wrote JJ.
One of the experts somewhere kept saying it was JJ too. SEN, 3AW or ABC, one of them.
They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.
-
Re: MRP thread 2017
Originally Posted by
Twodogs
One of the media flogs somewhere kept saying it was JJ too. SEN, 3AW or ABC, one of them.
Corrected for accuracy.
It's better to die on our feet than live on our knees.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes
-
Re: MRP thread 2017
Originally Posted by
Twodogs
One of the experts somewhere kept saying it was JJ too. SEN, 3AW or ABC, one of them.
Watched the first quarter again today. "expert commentator" Cameron Ling is an idiot. As he watches the replay he says "not sure that actually got him in the head", then when they show it again clearly showing that he got all head he comes out with "looks like it just glanced the jaw". Pathetic commentary.
I should leave it alone but you're not right
-
Re: MRP thread 2017
Originally Posted by
soupaman
Watched the first quarter again today. "expert commentator" Cameron Ling is an idiot. As he watches the replay he says "not sure that actually got him in the head", then when they show it again clearly showing that he got all head he comes out with "looks like it just glanced the jaw". Pathetic commentary.
Wasn't it Carey who said that?
-
Re: MRP thread 2017
Originally Posted by
bulldogsthru&thru
Wasn't it Carey who said that?
Yes it was
-
Re: MRP thread 2017
Jones $1000 fine foe bump on Cloke.
Sydney midfielder Zak Jones has also avoided suspension for a late hit on Western Bulldogs forward Travis Cloke, with the MRP offering him a $1000 fine.
While Jones had appeared to make some high contact, the hit was graded careless conduct with medium impact to the body.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Re: MRP thread 2017
Originally Posted by
bornadog
Jones $1000 fine foe bump on Cloke.
absolute rubbish. The MRP is a joke at the moment. Been saying it for years - penalties should not be based on injury sustained to the victim. It's about intent.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: MRP thread 2017
The MRP have had a howler this week.. Can't agree with them on any of their decisions as all were far too lenient.
-
Re: MRP thread 2017
Originally Posted by
bulldogsthru&thru
absolute rubbish. The MRP is a joke at the moment. Been saying it for years - penalties should not be based on injury sustained to the victim. It's about intent.
Exactly right. Scott Thompson on Dangerfield was the worst of the lot this week but only gets 1 week because Danger wasn't injured.
-
Re: MRP thread 2017
Originally Posted by
Axe Man
Exactly right. Scott Thompson on Dangerfield was the worst of the lot this week but only gets 1 week because Danger wasn't injured.
Staggered by this one as well. The Lewis one is also a head shaking decision. Medium impact for fracturing a guys jaw. I wonder if the MRP would classify an on-field murder as high impact; all indications would suggest probably not. And why should a player like Lewis, with his classified bad record, be given an early plea discount?
-
Re: MRP thread 2017
Originally Posted by
Doc26
And why should a player like Lewis, with his classified bad record, be given an early plea discount?
He wasn't. 3 weeks stayed 3 weeks because of his record.
For those who were always the underdogs and wore it as a badge of honour.
-
Re: MRP thread 2017
Originally Posted by
aker39
He wasn't. 3 weeks stayed 3 weeks because of his record.
No he gets a week week discount for an early plea.
Statement from the MRP:
In summary, his penalty is impacted by his previous bad record and he can accept a three-match sanction with an early plea.
Based on the available evidence and a medical report from the Carlton Football Club, the incident was assessed as intentional conduct with
medium impact to the head. The incident was classified as a three-match sanction. The player has an applicable bad record which impacts the penalty, increasing it by one match to a
four-match sanction. An early plea enables the player to accept a three-match sanction.