Re: 2016/17 Shield Cricket
That's another can of worms all together. CA has empowered the sports scientists to the point we're not likely to ever have a fit list of bowlers again, and in fact it's going to continue to be a noose around our neck forever and a day. It's extraordinary, the more influence they have the more injuries we get, and the more injuries we get the more we allow sports scientists to influence preparation.
Then again we're talking about the same executive team that appoints selectors with an all rounder fetish which is killing the team. Australian cricket is in terrible disarray, but by the time we hit rock bottom no one will care anymore anyway. We're halfway there now, and in the mean time CA will try to wring as many dollars as they can out of a never ending list of meaningless ODI's of ever diminishing return. Meanwhile the players will be little more than paid mercenaries with gaping technical flaws that the public has no connection with.
If cricket was a share I'd be selling futures
That's another can of worms all together. CA has empowered the sports scientists to the point we're not likely to ever have a fit list of bowlers again, and in fact it's going to continue to be a noose around our neck forever and a day. It's extraordinary, the more influence they have the more injuries we get, and the more injuries we get the more we allow sports scientists to influence preparation.
Then again we're talking about the same executive team that appoints selectors with an all rounder fetish which is killing the team. Australian cricket is in terrible disarray, but by the time we hit rock bottom no one will care anymore anyway. We're halfway there now, and in the mean time CA will try to wring as many dollars as they can out of a never ending list of meaningless ODI's of ever diminishing return. Meanwhile the players will be little more than paid mercenaries with gaping technical flaws that the public has no connection with.
If cricket was a share I'd be selling futures
Comment