Re: First Test - Australia v Sri Lanka, Brisbane
I pretty much agree with what you have written but I'm probably a bit more lenient with Harris. If we can find two openers who consistently get us off to good starts I can probably tolerate them missing out on big scores. Batting positions 3, 4, 5 and 6 should provide the bulk of the runs anyway but it is frustrating to see that Harris hasn't nailed that big score he probably deserves.
I hate saying this but if we just look at Shield scores at the moment it would be hard to come up with a top 6
Khawaja just hasn't made the runs we should be expecting from him and has been disappointing. He looks like he has all the talent needed but just doesn't get it done.
Labuchagne was good yesterday but as you rightly pointed out missed a great chance. He's worth sticking with though
Head should have done better and Patterson looks like a good prospect.
I'm not sure that Burns is much different to Handscomb
Pucovski also in the mix so we have some options
BAD mentioned about Starc and this is getting concerning. He hasn't been the force on home conditions we hoped for.
Tremain has to be a chance now.
Regarding the comment I highlighted, that has always been my impression of Stoinis who looks good in all forms of the game but I don't think he is good enough at rotating the strike.
I pretty much agree with what you have written but I'm probably a bit more lenient with Harris. If we can find two openers who consistently get us off to good starts I can probably tolerate them missing out on big scores. Batting positions 3, 4, 5 and 6 should provide the bulk of the runs anyway but it is frustrating to see that Harris hasn't nailed that big score he probably deserves.
I hate saying this but if we just look at Shield scores at the moment it would be hard to come up with a top 6
Khawaja just hasn't made the runs we should be expecting from him and has been disappointing. He looks like he has all the talent needed but just doesn't get it done.
Labuchagne was good yesterday but as you rightly pointed out missed a great chance. He's worth sticking with though
Head should have done better and Patterson looks like a good prospect.
I'm not sure that Burns is much different to Handscomb
Pucovski also in the mix so we have some options
BAD mentioned about Starc and this is getting concerning. He hasn't been the force on home conditions we hoped for.
Tremain has to be a chance now.
Regarding the comment I highlighted, that has always been my impression of Stoinis who looks good in all forms of the game but I don't think he is good enough at rotating the strike.
Comment