Interesting Figures

[LostDoggy]

Nannes playing against WA this morning has the following figures when taken out of the attack - most unusual

Nannes, DP
0.1 Overs
0 Maidens
2 Runs
1 Wicket

Don't think i've seen that before

[Mantis]

Re: Interesting Figures

Heard he bowled 3 full bunger's in a row.

[Go_Dogs]

Re: Interesting Figures

One ball, 1/2?!

[Mantis]

Re: Interesting Figures

One ball, 1/2?!

2 no balls included.

WA 3/29.

Batsman Out:

Marsh 1
Pomersbach 2
Voges 0

Aren't these guys supposed to be next in line for Baggy greens???

Hodge not playing for the Vics. We must be resting him for matches against the good teams.

[hujsh]

Re: Interesting Figures

NSW 7/123
Swan 4/21
Henriques 32 top scorer

WA 3/74
Siddle 2/23
North 29*

[westdog54]

Re: Interesting Figures

http://www.cricket.com.au/default.aspx?s=news-display&id=14496

From the Cricket Australia website.

One of the more bizarre sessions of cricket you'll see.

[LostDoggy]

Re: Interesting Figures

http://www.cricket.com.au/default.as...splay&id=14496

From the Cricket Australia website.

One of the more bizarre sessions of cricket you'll see.

Three Beamers to begin with including a wicket and then banished for the innings.

That's an over to tell your grand-kids about.

Someone said that fast bowlers are not Rhodes scholars

[Sockeye Salmon]

Re: Interesting Figures

Three Beamers to begin with including a wicket and then banished for the innings.

That's an over to tell your grand-kids about.

Someone said that fast bowlers are not Rhodes scholars

If the first one was a beamer how come it wasn't a no-ball?

[azabob]

Re: Interesting Figures

If the first one was a beamer how come it wasn't a no-ball?

I assume it was below waste height, isn't the rule two in a row and you are off?

[westdog54]

Re: Interesting Figures

I assume it was below waste height, isn't the rule two in a row and you are off?

Not sure if the exact rule is two in the one over or two for the innings.

Was it Waqar Younis that bowled 2 at Andrew Symonds in the World Cup a few years back?

[Mantis]

Re: Interesting Figures

Vics 1/19

Rogers 10*
Quiney 0*

WA all out 239

[Sockeye Salmon]

Re: Interesting Figures

Vics 1/19

Rogers 10*
Quiney 0*

WA all out 239

Vics 3/78 at tea.

Rogers 40no
White 7no

Not a lot of batting to come for the Vics. I don't think they'll get 1st innings points unless these two make most of them.

Hussey made 8. I can't see how anyone can argue for his inclusion in any Australian team, he's hardly made a run all season.

[westdog54]

Re: Interesting Figures

Hussey made 8. I can't see how anyone can argue for his inclusion in any Australian team, he's hardly made a run all season.

Neither has Symonds

[Sockeye Salmon]

Re: Interesting Figures

Vics went from 3/188 to 8/217 - that's 5/29 (I told you our batting was suspect).

Wade and Siddle did well to get us to 8/238 at stumps needing just 2 more runs for 1st innings points. How frustrating was it watching cricket.com.au and getting to within a run of WA's score and stopping?

McDonald missed out again and must have some pressure on keeping his spot when Hodge comes back.

[Sockeye Salmon]

Re: Interesting Figures

No problems for the Vics to pick up 1st innnings points.

Siddle and Wade took the score to 280 before North (of all people) picked up Siddle for 38.

Since then Wade has gone beserk hitting 3 sixes and 2 fours. Wade is now 65no and the Vics are 9/322, lead by 83.