Man City Sack Mark Hughes

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Coon Dog
    Bulldog Team of the Century
    • Jan 2007
    • 7579

    Man City Sack Mark Hughes

    MANCINI REPLACES HUGHES AT EASTLANDS

    Mark Hughes has been sacked as Manchester City manager, paying the price for a run of two wins in 11 games.

    Roberto Mancini has already been installed as Hughes' replacement, with Brian Kidd as his number two, in a move which confirmed speculation that a decision had already been taken before Saturday's 4-3 win over Sunderland.

    Wednesday's three-goal hammering at Tottenham convinced owner Sheikh Mansour and chairman Khaldoon al-Mubarak that Hughes could not steer City into the top four, as had been expected following a summer outlay of £120million.

    "A return of two wins in 11 Premier League games is clearly not in line with the targets that were agreed and set," said Khaldoon, in a statement.

    "Sheikh Mansour and the board felt there was no evidence that the situation would fundamentally change."

    It seems a bizarre statement, given City's victory on Saturday sees them move up to sixth in the Premier League, with games in hand over most of the teams above them.

    Yet, after delivering his own assessment of the situation at City last May, when he stated sixth place would be an adequate return this term, it seems Khaldoon moved the goalposts once he knew just how much Hughes wanted for a vast rebuilding programme, which included revamping the club's Carrington training complex.

    "Prior to the current season beginning, with significant investment in players and infrastructure in place, the consensus between the board and coaching staff was that appropriate agreed targets should be set," said Khaldoon.

    "The targets were agreed as a result of the player acquisition strategy of the club being radically accelerated in the summer as a result of very favourable conditions for any buying club.

    "It was also based on the fact that the infrastructure of the club had been overhauled completely at great cost in order to create the best possible environment for the team."

    Hughes was responsible for the arrival of Emmanuel Adebayor and Kolo Toure from Arsenal for a combined fee of £40million last summer - but neither have consistently impressed.

    Toure and goalkeeper Shay Given were called out of the City dressing room immediately after Saturday evening's game and were told of Hughes fate and asked to inform the remainder of the dressing room.

    There is bound to be a sense of sadness, especially from people such as Craig Bellamy and Carlos Tevez, who stated his desire for City's owners to remain patient with Hughes.

    However, with chief executive Garry Cook and influential football administrator Brian Marwood not sharing Hughes' vision of the future either, the Tottenham debacle sealed the Welshman's fate.

    There was an argument Khaldoon should wait until after the Christmas fixtures against Stoke and Wolves, and even an FA Cup tie at Middlesbrough and a League Cup semi-final, the first time City have reached the last four of any domestic competition in almost 29 years, against Manchester United at the beginning of next month.

    However, with another transfer window about to open, Khaldoon took the view it was better to act now.

    In Mancini, he is bringing in a 45-year-old who guided Inter Milan to three successive Serie A titles from 2006 before being sacked in 2008 after failing to make any impact in Europe.

    By installing Kidd as his number two, Mancini ensures he has the knowledge of the English game he currently lacks alongside him in the dugout.

    "Roberto is a hugely experienced manager with a proven track record of winning trophies and championships," said Khaldoon. "His experience and track record speak for themselves.

    "What is absolutely clear is that Roberto believes in Manchester City's potential to achieve at the highest level and importantly in his own ability to make this happen.

    "My hope is that our incredible fans will join us in welcoming Roberto to the football club."

    Mancini's first game in charge will be against Stoke on Boxing Day, with his official lined up for Monday.
    [COLOR="Red"][B][U][COLOR="Blue"]85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse![/COLOR][/U][/B][/COLOR]
  • Twodogs
    Moderator
    • Nov 2006
    • 27654

    #2
    Re: Man City Sack Mark Hughes

    I told you, didnt I?
    They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

    Comment

    • GVGjr
      Moderator
      • Nov 2006
      • 44573

      #3
      Re: Man City Sack Mark Hughes

      Liverpool got beaten again so they can't be too far from moving on the Manager either.
      Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

      Comment

      • Remi Moses
        WOOF Member
        • Jan 2009
        • 14785

        #4
        Re: Man City Sack Mark Hughes

        Brian Kidd another United plant for the Massives !I thought the massives with their oil money would have hoped for abetter return thus far.

        Comment

        • Missing Dog
          WOOF Member
          • Jan 2007
          • 8501

          #5
          Re: Man City Sack Mark Hughes

          It's the double edged sword - you could never win in that situation, even look at Chelsea's managers! Real Madrid's manager will feel the same pressure if they don't take away the title.

          Benitez will argue lack of funds but he needs to share some of the blame, some of his purchases when the money was there have not flourished as expected.

          Comment

          • GVGjr
            Moderator
            • Nov 2006
            • 44573

            #6
            Re: Man City Sack Mark Hughes

            Originally posted by Swoop
            It's the double edged sword - you could never win in that situation, even look at Chelsea's managers! Real Madrid's manager will feel the same pressure if they don't take away the title.

            Benitez will argue lack of funds but he needs to share some of the blame, some of his purchases when the money was there have not flourished as expected.
            Liverpool would have budgeted for a top 6 finish at least which guarantees them a spot in Europe doesn't it? If they miss the money that comes with that do they have a war chest to cover that shortfall? They might find it even harder to spend money on players.
            Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

            Comment

            • The Coon Dog
              Bulldog Team of the Century
              • Jan 2007
              • 7579

              #7
              Re: Man City Sack Mark Hughes

              Originally posted by GVGjr
              Liverpool would have budgeted for a top 6 finish at least which guarantees them a spot in Europe doesn't it? If they miss the money that comes with that do they have a war chest to cover that shortfall? They might find it even harder to spend money on players.
              The problem Liverpool's 'cash strapped' owners have is that they recently signed Rafa Benitez to a 4 year, £20M deal & they would have to pay him out if they off loaded him.
              [COLOR="Red"][B][U][COLOR="Blue"]85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse![/COLOR][/U][/B][/COLOR]

              Comment

              • GVGjr
                Moderator
                • Nov 2006
                • 44573

                #8
                Re: Man City Sack Mark Hughes

                Originally posted by The Coon Dog
                The problem Liverpool's 'cash strapped' owners have is that they recently signed Rafa Benitez to a 4 year, £20M deal & they would have to pay him out if they off loaded him.
                From just a club perspective what would be the impacts of missing Europe?
                I'm guessing that with Liverpool's record they would have structured everything around getting the money that qualifying for Europe brings because it was regarded as a lock that they would make it. If they don't make it, could really impact them for next season and they might have to plan a season around not making it which means they could lose some big names.
                Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

                Comment

                • Twodogs
                  Moderator
                  • Nov 2006
                  • 27654

                  #9
                  Re: Man City Sack Mark Hughes

                  Originally posted by GVGjr
                  From just a club perspective what would be the impacts of missing Europe?
                  I'm guessing that with Liverpool's record they would have structured everything around getting the money that qualifying for Europe brings because it was regarded as a lock that they would make it. If they don't make it, could really impact them for next season and they might have to plan a season around not making it which means they could lose some big names.

                  It's a massive blow for Liverpool.



                  They would have budgeted around qualifying for Europe and the cash hit they take and the blow to their prestige will be huge. Look at Leeds they missed Europe money once and the house of cards they'd built fell down. Liverpool wont fall apart like Leeds but they'll have to find the missing money somewhere.

                  The other thing is players. If you cant promise virtually automatic qualification for Europe (especially in a WC year) then your good players will go to where the stage will be provided and good players from outside just wont come.
                  They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

                  Comment

                  • GVGjr
                    Moderator
                    • Nov 2006
                    • 44573

                    #10
                    Re: Man City Sack Mark Hughes

                    Originally posted by Twodogs
                    The other thing is players. If you cant promise virtually automatic qualification for Europe (especially in a WC year) then your good players will go to where the stage will be provided and good players from outside just wont come.
                    That's the point I should have made clearer. My guess is that this would only be a temporary setback for Liverpool but for every Buffon who sticks with a powerful club regardless there must be 20 who won't.
                    Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

                    Comment

                    • The Coon Dog
                      Bulldog Team of the Century
                      • Jan 2007
                      • 7579

                      #11
                      Re: Man City Sack Mark Hughes

                      So, about Man City sacking Mark Hughes....
                      [COLOR="Red"][B][U][COLOR="Blue"]85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse![/COLOR][/U][/B][/COLOR]

                      Comment

                      • GVGjr
                        Moderator
                        • Nov 2006
                        • 44573

                        #12
                        Re: Man City Sack Mark Hughes

                        Originally posted by The Coon Dog
                        So, about Man City sacking Mark Hughes....
                        Was it the right decision? They have improved but obviously not to the required level.
                        Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

                        Comment

                        • LostDoggy
                          WOOF Member
                          • Jan 2007
                          • 8307

                          #13
                          Re: Man City Sack Mark Hughes

                          Originally posted by Swoop
                          It's the double edged sword - you could never win in that situation, even look at Chelsea's managers! Real Madrid's manager will feel the same pressure if they don't take away the title..
                          Heck, at Real 'Lunatic's Asylum' Madrid you can win the title and still get the sack. Just ask Capello and Del Bosque (now coaching England and no.1 ranked Spain, respectively). Del Bosque got the sack after winning three championships in a row (and a Champions League trophy to boot)!

                          They are the most ridiculously mismanaged club in the world, and if not for the Spanish government bailing their ass out everytime they get in a mountain of unpayable debt they would have gone bankrupt many times in their history. Talk about a joke of a team, Perez won the 'presidency' of the club on promises of a second 'Galacticos' era (despite the first being a dismal failure relative to the financial outlay), and despite spending well over a billion Australian dollars in the off-season, are still as inconsistent and defensively leaky as ever.

                          **On the other hand, we have Barcelona, with their responsible financial management, strong "home-grown player" philosophy, beautiful (and historically consistent) style of play, and aspirations to sports 'nobility' with their UNICEF shirt sponsorship (they pay UNICEF to have their logo on their shirts, which is the opposite of what most teams do, which is to have big corporations pay them to have their logo on the shirt). I am not a Barcelona fan inherently, but you can't help but admire what they've done (despite them having Henry on their books). Of their players, with all due respect to Messi, Iniesta is a genius and should have won the Ballon D'or.

                          Comment

                          • The Coon Dog
                            Bulldog Team of the Century
                            • Jan 2007
                            • 7579

                            #14
                            Re: Man City Sack Mark Hughes

                            Originally posted by GVGjr
                            Was it the right decision? They have improved but obviously not to the required level.
                            When you bring so many 'big names' in, I reckon you need a while to get accustomed to all the ego's about the place & to get them to gel.

                            I don't think they have been that bad, sure they had a run of draws a little while back, but they're well placed in the league (only 2 defeats, the fewest in the league) & in the semi's of the Carling Cup.

                            Unfortunately, big money owners expect immediate results.

                            I think it was the wrong decision, as do some senior players at Eastlands:

                            "The players were disgusted at the treatment of Hughes after it emerged his fate was sealed following the Carling Cup victory over Arsenal on December 2.

                            Outraged Manchester City stars confronted chief executive Gary Cook over the sacking of Mark Hughes and the £10million appointment of Roberto Mancini

                            Craig Bellamy and Shay Given led a six-man delegation after axed Hughes made an emotional dressing speech telling them he was being replaced by the former Inter Milan boss."

                            Link
                            [COLOR="Red"][B][U][COLOR="Blue"]85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse![/COLOR][/U][/B][/COLOR]

                            Comment

                            • LostDoggy
                              WOOF Member
                              • Jan 2007
                              • 8307

                              #15
                              Re: Man City Sack Mark Hughes

                              Originally posted by The Coon Dog
                              When you bring so many 'big names' in, I reckon you need a while to get accustomed to all the ego's about the place & to get them to gel.

                              I don't think they have been that bad, sure they had a run of draws a little while back, but they're well placed in the league (only 2 defeats, the fewest in the league) & in the semi's of the Carling Cup.

                              Unfortunately, big money owners expect immediate results.

                              I think it was the wrong decision, as do some senior players at Eastlands:

                              "The players were disgusted at the treatment of Hughes after it emerged his fate was sealed following the Carling Cup victory over Arsenal on December 2.

                              Outraged Manchester City stars confronted chief executive Gary Cook over the sacking of Mark Hughes and the £10million appointment of Roberto Mancini

                              Craig Bellamy and Shay Given led a six-man delegation after axed Hughes made an emotional dressing speech telling them he was being replaced by the former Inter Milan boss."

                              Link
                              Agree. Wrong decision -- classic mismanagement by trigger-happy rich owners.

                              Big clubs with lots of money need MORE stability, not less.

                              Having said that, Mancini is very, very good and they just have to make sure that they give him time and not sack him too soon as well, thus compounding this mistake with another one.

                              Comment

                              Working...