Cowan, Marsh, Hilfenhaus named for Boxing Day

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bornadog
    WOOF Clubhouse Leader
    • Jan 2007
    • 66785

    Cowan, Marsh, Hilfenhaus named for Boxing Day

    Daniel Brettig

    Ed Cowan, the Tasmania opening batsman, has barged his way into Australia's Boxing Day Test team to face India through weight of runs, and will be joined in the top three by Shaun Marsh provided the West Australian can prove his fitness.

    Ben Hilfenhaus has also earned a recall, as the selectors sought an experienced head to help a young bowling attack battle India's batsmen at the MCG.

    Cowan and Marsh replaced Phillip Hughes and Usman Khawaja from the XI that was ingloriously beaten by New Zealand in Hobart, with Shane Watson and Ryan Harris unable to be chosen due to continued fitness complaints.

    Watson aggravated a calf problem on day one of the team's batting camp in Melbourne, while Harris indicated he was short of the required conditioning after returning to cricket for the Brisbane Heat in last night's BBL match at the Gabba.

    Australia Test squad
    Michael Clarke (capt), Ed Cowan, David Warner, Shaun Marsh, Ricky Ponting, Michael Hussey, Daniel Christian, Brad Haddin, Peter Siddle, James Pattinson, Ben Hilfenhaus, Mitchell Starc, Nathan Lyon
    John Inverarity, the national selector, said Cowan would open the batting, with Marsh and Daniel Christian to vie for one spot and Hilfenhaus and Mitchell Starc the other.

    "Ed has been in wonderful form, and the intention is that he will open the batting with David Warner," Inverarity said. "Of the XI that will line up on December 26, it will either be Shaun Marsh or Daniel Christian.

    "It is likely if Shaun plays that he'll be batting at No. 3, if Daniel plays then he'd be at No. 6 and the batting line-up would be re-arranged accordingly, and then it would seem likely that one of Mitchell Starc and Ben Hilfenhaus would be 12th man. That's the anticipated balance of the side but we'll have to wait on weather and pitch conditions and final form and fitness."

    Inverarity said Marsh's need to show his back can stand up to the rigours of a Test match caused the naming of a 13-man squad.

    "The NSP has named 13 players due to the ongoing uncertainty about the fitness of Shaun Marsh," Inverarity said. "Shane Watson was not considered for selection as he has not recovered sufficiently from his injury. Ryan Harris has not yet achieved the volume of bowling required to be available for consideration for Test selection.

    "Ed Cowan has been in excellent form in recent weeks. His inclusion is in recognition of his consistently good performances and we anticipate that he can provide steadiness at the top of the order. Ben Hilfenhaus has regained form this season and he provides a strong and reliable bowling option.

    "We see both Phillip Hughes and Usman Khawaja as developing players with bright futures and remaining as players of significance. They are determined young men and I know that they will work hard to produce compelling performances and push strongly for further consideration."

    Since turning around an indifferent start to the season with an unbeaten 91 in a limited overs match against South Australia in Burnie in mid-November, Cowan's scores have been 4, 134*, 145, 10, 65, 145* and 109 in the first innings of the tour match against the Indians.

    His strong form has been mirrored by Hilfenhaus, who has shown greater snap and swing this summer, most recently for Hobart in the Twenty20 competition, after he looked innocuous at times against England during last summer's Ashes series. He was also considered close to selection for the New Zealand series, though the selectors ultimately decided to test out a younger attack as a precursor to India's visit.

    "Ben Hilfenhaus is in very good form," Inverarity said. "I think he had a few body concerns and his action deteriorated a little bit last year and he seems to have got it back and been playing in very good form. He is a strong, durable, experienced bowler.

    "It [the T20 match in Perth] certainly wasn't a negative, he bowled very well, but we've been considering Ben for some weeks and he provides a strong, durable experienced option for us."

    Watson's case is more problematic, as he has now suffered a trio of fitness problems since the start of the South Africa tour. Inverarity said the panel was hopeful Watson would be fit to play in the second Test of the India series in Sydney.

    "Shane is not fit to play. He's had ongoing troubles with his calf," Inverarity said. "The situation is improving and we hope he'll be in contention for the second Test in Sydney. But he's not available to play this game. It is an option for him to bat down the order, yes. The word from Shane Watson was that he was not fit to play. I wasn't in Melbourne yesterday but he spoke at length with Mickey Arthur and the word was he's not ready."

    Ricky Ponting and Michael Hussey remain part of the Test team despite poor displays in Hobart and advancing years, Inverarity speaking of their value to the dressing room as a critical factor in their continued retention.

    "They've both been wonderful cricketers, they are wonderful cricketers, and terrific men and provide a lot for the side," he said. "We all on the selection panel are keen for them to do well. We're hoping they have a breakthrough in the next week or two. They offer a tremendous amount to the side."
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
  • chef
    Hall of Fame
    • Nov 2008
    • 14632

    #2
    Re: Cowan, Marsh, Hilfenhaus named for Boxing Day

    Very happy to have Cowan in and Marsh back.
    The curse is dead.

    Comment

    • GVGjr
      Moderator
      • Nov 2006
      • 44690

      #3
      Re: Cowan, Marsh, Hilfenhaus named for Boxing Day

      Originally posted by chef
      Very happy to have Cowan in and Marsh back.
      Glad that you are happy but can you add some detail on why?
      Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

      Comment

      • LostDoggy
        WOOF Member
        • Jan 2007
        • 8307

        #4
        Re: Cowan, Marsh, Hilfenhaus named for Boxing Day

        Originally posted by GVGjr
        Glad that you are happy but can you add some detail on why?
        Because they have earned their places and the other two have not performed in recent times.

        Comment

        • chef
          Hall of Fame
          • Nov 2008
          • 14632

          #5
          Re: Cowan, Marsh, Hilfenhaus named for Boxing Day

          Originally posted by GVGjr
          Glad that you are happy but can you add some detail on why?
          To me, Cowan is the best specialist opener in Australia(which he has shown over the last few seasons) and Marsh has already shown that he is a quality batsman. Hopefully these two will make our line-up less brittle. I am disappointed that Khawaja is out instead of one of Hussey or Ponting.
          The curse is dead.

          Comment

          • LostDoggy
            WOOF Member
            • Jan 2007
            • 8307

            #6
            Re: Cowan, Marsh, Hilfenhaus named for Boxing Day

            Originally posted by chef
            To me, Cowan is the best specialist opener in Australia(which he has shown over the last few seasons) and Marsh has already shown that he is a quality batsman. Hopefully these two will make our line-up less brittle. I am disappointed that Khawaja is out instead of one of Hussey or Ponting.
            To say the least, not to mention our incredible teflon vice-captain that has not performed in over 24 months.

            However, perhaps it's a good thing for the long term, as I can't see any of the three doing anything but be thoroughly humiliated against India, which will at least force the selectors' hands. I suggest that perhaps all three will be axed (not all at once) either during or soon after the series.

            Ponting I can at least understand -- former captain, one of the greatest Test batsmen of all time, but Hussey and Haddin? Cowan has to score ridiculous numbers to get into (scrape into, more like .. the way the selectors were framing it -- "stars aligned etc." -- was as if it was still a toss up between him and Hughes, and if Hughes had somehow scored more runs in the Chairman's XI, would have been picked instead?!; ridiculous..) the Test team, these guys have barely scored a run in 2 years and they sail merrily on based on 'dressing room harmony'? It's baffling.

            Comment

            • Sockeye Salmon
              Bulldog Team of the Century
              • Jan 2007
              • 6365

              #7
              Re: Cowan, Marsh, Hilfenhaus named for Boxing Day

              Just for the exercise

              In 2011:

              Ponting 293 @ 26.6
              Haddin 302 @ 21.5
              Hussey 591 @ 42.2


              In the last two series (4 tests), Hussey has 83 @ 11.8. In the 4 tests before that he had scored 508 @ 72.6.

              Hussey has now gone 7 innings without a 50. A feat that has happened only once before (he broke the run then with 195!).

              Hussey has also had a run of 8 innings without a 50 but that included a 45no.

              Comment

              • BulldogBelle
                WOOF Member
                • Nov 2006
                • 5284

                #8
                Re: Cowan, Marsh, Hilfenhaus named for Boxing Day

                I've been a huge Hussey fan over his career, I even think he started too late with the national team. But really, he is living off the fact that he was the only batsman to fire a shot against England out here last Ashes Series. Also the fact that perhaps not many have been beating the door down in the Shield.

                Dissapointed to see Khawaja miss out, but I can undertand, sort of. He will be back, along with Hughes too I hope. Many great players players have been dropeed in their career; Waugh and McGrath to name a couple.

                I hope Cowan does well, and not sure what they'll do with the bowlers. Starc doesn't possess a stock ball and cant maintain pressure (need that against India), and I do like Hilfy but I think he might be a just a yard or two slow. We'll need a fifth bowler also.

                Hope it's a green top!!

                Comment

                • LostDoggy
                  WOOF Member
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 8307

                  #9
                  Re: Cowan, Marsh, Hilfenhaus named for Boxing Day

                  Originally posted by wonnydog
                  Dissapointed to see Khawaja miss out, but I can undertand, sort of. He will be back, along with Hughes too I hope. Many great players players have been dropeed in their career; Waugh and McGrath to name a couple.
                  And plenty of shit players never get dropped until far too late: North was one, Symonds was another, Smith was picked and persisted with without any rhyme or reason, and Haddin not only doesn't get dropped, he gets made vice-captain!

                  Waugh and McGrath were dropped due to loss of form, which is exactly what should be happening to Haddin. Waugh and McGrath (and Ponting and Hayden and Langer) were reinstated once they regained form at state level, the same can happen to Haddin, but at this point he will just continue screwing up at Test level until he gets dropped for Paine, never to be seen again. The difference is that Waugh and McGrath could work on their form out of the spotlight to reemerge stronger, but Haddin's public struggles will impact on the performance of our premier national team in an embarassing fashion.

                  Usman is being dropped for no reason other than to keep non-performing players in the team. It's quite different from the old, form-based selections that an old bastard like Bob Simpson would have insisted on. How must Khawaja feel seeing that, despite being probably the best specialist no.3 in the country, he struggles to keep a spot in the top 6 (while scoring runs) when he saw a Steve Smith play as no.6 batsman despite barely being in the top 50 batsmen in the country, and a Brad Haddin get promoted to VC, one injury away from being CAPTAIN OF THE AUSTRALIAN TEST TEAM despite playing some of the most irresponsible batting innings in Test history over the last 6 months and being generally all-round shit?

                  How must Wade feel? A better gloveman scoring more runs, not even considered -- and it's not as if Haddin is a once-in-a-generation player either.. why can't selectors just swap Wade, Haddin and Paine (if fit) around depending on form, so that we get the best performance at Test level? We seem to have become so hung up in the last few years on 'continuity' and team balance (and dressing room dynamics! I didn't know there was a Test Ranking for dressing room harmony), while AFL and soccer teams, which actually rely more on continuity and combinations than cricket, swap players out every week and cope accordingly. It's not as if we play a Test every week anyway, so continuity is largely a non-issue (what's the saying? "Cricket is an individual sport played by teams"). I just really don't understand this ridiculous over-protection of non-performing players. It's hard not to see favouritism in the selections.

                  Comment

                  • Sockeye Salmon
                    Bulldog Team of the Century
                    • Jan 2007
                    • 6365

                    #10
                    Re: Cowan, Marsh, Hilfenhaus named for Boxing Day

                    Originally posted by Lantern
                    And plenty of shit players never get dropped until far too late: North was one, Symonds was another, Smith was picked and persisted with without any rhyme or reason, and Haddin not only doesn't get dropped, he gets made vice-captain!

                    Waugh and McGrath were dropped due to loss of form, which is exactly what should be happening to Haddin. Waugh and McGrath (and Ponting and Hayden and Langer) were reinstated once they regained form at state level, the same can happen to Haddin, but at this point he will just continue screwing up at Test level until he gets dropped for Paine, never to be seen again. The difference is that Waugh and McGrath could work on their form out of the spotlight to reemerge stronger, but Haddin's public struggles will impact on the performance of our premier national team in an embarassing fashion.

                    Usman is being dropped for no reason other than to keep non-performing players in the team. It's quite different from the old, form-based selections that an old bastard like Bob Simpson would have insisted on. How must Khawaja feel seeing that, despite being probably the best specialist no.3 in the country, he struggles to keep a spot in the top 6 (while scoring runs) when he saw a Steve Smith play as no.6 batsman despite barely being in the top 50 batsmen in the country, and a Brad Haddin get promoted to VC, one injury away from being CAPTAIN OF THE AUSTRALIAN TEST TEAM despite playing some of the most irresponsible batting innings in Test history over the last 6 months and being generally all-round shit?

                    How must Wade feel? A better gloveman scoring more runs, not even considered -- and it's not as if Haddin is a once-in-a-generation player either.. why can't selectors just swap Wade, Haddin and Paine (if fit) around depending on form, so that we get the best performance at Test level? We seem to have become so hung up in the last few years on 'continuity' and team balance (and dressing room dynamics! I didn't know there was a Test Ranking for dressing room harmony), while AFL and soccer teams, which actually rely more on continuity and combinations than cricket, swap players out every week and cope accordingly. It's not as if we play a Test every week anyway, so continuity is largely a non-issue (what's the saying? "Cricket is an individual sport played by teams"). I just really don't understand this ridiculous over-protection of non-performing players. It's hard not to see favouritism in the selections.
                    All of this is right except one bit, Khawaja isn't making runs and absolutely should be dropped. Haddin and Ponting should both be long gone.

                    I'd hang on to Hussey for the moment but he's on very thin ice.

                    Comment

                    • LostDoggy
                      WOOF Member
                      • Jan 2007
                      • 8307

                      #11
                      Re: Cowan, Marsh, Hilfenhaus named for Boxing Day

                      Originally posted by Sockeye Salmon
                      All of this is right except one bit, Khawaja isn't making runs and absolutely should be dropped. Haddin and Ponting should both be long gone.

                      I'd hang on to Hussey for the moment but he's on very thin ice.
                      I thought he scored some runs in the Chairman's XI? Nonetheless, who would you have in the team instead of Brad and Ricky? The next two cabs off the rank seem to be Marsh and Christian as a no.6 all-rounder; would your preference be for both of them to play in the place of the two veterans?

                      I guess my point is like a baggy green these days is like a lifetime appointment one way or another (unless you're a post-Warne spinner). Why can't Hussey or Haddin (for argument's sake) go back to state cricket, find form, then be in the frame for a recall? Why can't Katich be an option if he's scoring runs again? It's like we've developed a culture of retention for the sake of it (almost "honorary positions") in the one place (our national squad) where competition for spots should actually be highest.

                      Comment

                      • Sockeye Salmon
                        Bulldog Team of the Century
                        • Jan 2007
                        • 6365

                        #12
                        Re: Cowan, Marsh, Hilfenhaus named for Boxing Day

                        Originally posted by Lantern
                        I thought he scored some runs in the Chairman's XI? Nonetheless, who would you have in the team instead of Brad and Ricky? The next two cabs off the rank seem to be Marsh and Christian as a no.6 all-rounder; would your preference be for both of them to play in the place of the two veterans?

                        I guess my point is like a baggy green these days is like a lifetime appointment one way or another (unless you're a post-Warne spinner). Why can't Hussey or Haddin (for argument's sake) go back to state cricket, find form, then be in the frame for a recall? Why can't Katich be an option if he's scoring runs again? It's like we've developed a culture of retention for the sake of it (almost "honorary positions") in the one place (our national squad) where competition for spots should actually be highest.
                        I think Khawaja got 50no in the chairman's IX game.

                        I'm on your side in this one. Ponting and Haddin should both be left out.

                        I'm a big fan of having an all-rounder. Christian has been making runs but I don't really rate his bowling. I think Faulkner is going to be a star but he hasn't made any runs.

                        Either/or. The important thing is we include another bowler, we will be spending long days in the field.

                        Comment

                        • DOG GOD
                          Bulldog Team of the Century
                          • Jul 2007
                          • 6553

                          #13
                          Re: Cowan, Marsh, Hilfenhaus named for Boxing Day

                          Originally posted by Lantern
                          And plenty of shit players never get dropped until far too late: North was one, Symonds was another, Smith was picked and persisted with without any rhyme or reason, and Haddin not only doesn't get dropped, he gets made vice-captain!

                          Waugh and McGrath were dropped due to loss of form, which is exactly what should be happening to Haddin. Waugh and McGrath (and Ponting and Hayden and Langer) were reinstated once they regained form at state level, the same can happen to Haddin, but at this point he will just continue screwing up at Test level until he gets dropped for Paine, never to be seen again. The difference is that Waugh and McGrath could work on their form out of the spotlight to reemerge stronger, but Haddin's public struggles will impact on the performance of our premier national team in an embarassing fashion.

                          Usman is being dropped for no reason other than to keep non-performing players in the team. It's quite different from the old, form-based selections that an old bastard like Bob Simpson would have insisted on. How must Khawaja feel seeing that, despite being probably the best specialist no.3 in the country, he struggles to keep a spot in the top 6 (while scoring runs) when he saw a Steve Smith play as no.6 batsman despite barely being in the top 50 batsmen in the country, and a Brad Haddin get promoted to VC, one injury away from being CAPTAIN OF THE AUSTRALIAN TEST TEAM despite playing some of the most irresponsible batting innings in Test history over the last 6 months and being generally all-round shit?

                          How must Wade feel? A better gloveman scoring more runs, not even considered -- and it's not as if Haddin is a once-in-a-generation player either.. why can't selectors just swap Wade, Haddin and Paine (if fit) around depending on form, so that we get the best performance at Test level? We seem to have become so hung up in the last few years on 'continuity' and team balance (and dressing room dynamics! I didn't know there was a Test Ranking for dressing room harmony), while AFL and soccer teams, which actually rely more on continuity and combinations than cricket, swap players out every week and cope accordingly. It's not as if we play a Test every week anyway, so continuity is largely a non-issue (what's the saying? "Cricket is an individual sport played by teams"). I just really don't understand this ridiculous over-protection of non-performing players. It's hard not to see favouritism in the selections.
                          Agree 100% lantern. Im not a fan of the Australian team to be honest...havent been since the under arm delivery, but there is favouritism amongst thiss group and the sooner the "Boys club" culture gets destroyed, the better it will be with players being selected on merit, which doesnt happen too often.

                          Regarding Usman, ex players like Martin Love and Brad Hodge say hello
                          I will never see #16 the same!!

                          Comment

                          • KT31
                            Bulldog Team of the Century
                            • Jul 2008
                            • 5454

                            #14
                            Re: Cowan, Marsh, Hilfenhaus named for Boxing Day

                            Originally posted by DOG GOD
                            Agree 100% lantern. Im not a fan of the Australian team to be honest...havent been since the under arm delivery, but there is favouritism amongst thiss group and the sooner the "Boys club" culture gets destroyed, the better it will be with players being selected on merit, which doesnt happen too often.

                            Regarding Usman, ex players like Martin Love and Brad Hodge say hello
                            Lot of quality players since then and a lot of water under the bridge, you could never be accused of holding a grudge.
                            It's better to die on our feet than live on our knees.

                            Comment

                            • The Coon Dog
                              Bulldog Team of the Century
                              • Jan 2007
                              • 7579

                              #15
                              Re: Cowan, Marsh, Hilfenhaus named for Boxing Day

                              Michael Clarke wins the toss. Australia batting.

                              Marsh, Cowan & Hilfy in.
                              Hughes, Khawaja & Starc out.
                              [COLOR="Red"][B][U][COLOR="Blue"]85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse![/COLOR][/U][/B][/COLOR]

                              Comment

                              Working...