Re: Hayden in doubt for the 3rd test
The thing that works in Rogers favour is that he hasn't been playing the full international test schedules that the national squad would do, and as such IMO the body and mind would be in shape for a slightly longer international career. He could easily play 5-7 years of test cricket, whereas Hayden probably has one, maybe 2 more international seasons left in him. As I've stated, I don't believe Katich has made the most of the opportunities that he's already had, and as such shouldn't be as high in test considerations. I would apply the same logic to Stuart Clark who had to wait quite a while for a shot at the National team, whereas someone like Mitch Johnson, who has started his test/ODI career slightly earlier, may not play to the same age as Stuart Clark might.
Glad we're on the same page on Siddons. He's generally regarded as one of the best Australian players never to play test cricket.
The thing that works in Rogers favour is that he hasn't been playing the full international test schedules that the national squad would do, and as such IMO the body and mind would be in shape for a slightly longer international career. He could easily play 5-7 years of test cricket, whereas Hayden probably has one, maybe 2 more international seasons left in him. As I've stated, I don't believe Katich has made the most of the opportunities that he's already had, and as such shouldn't be as high in test considerations. I would apply the same logic to Stuart Clark who had to wait quite a while for a shot at the National team, whereas someone like Mitch Johnson, who has started his test/ODI career slightly earlier, may not play to the same age as Stuart Clark might.
Glad we're on the same page on Siddons. He's generally regarded as one of the best Australian players never to play test cricket.
Comment