If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
Was shattered when Hird got sacked and there was a possibility that Essendon could get themselves a decent coach. Thankfully their arrogance and stupidity came to the fore
Could Paul Little have possibly done any more for opposition clubs than what he already has done? This is his final parting gift to the rest of the AFL community
Was shattered when Hird got sacked and there was a possibility that Essendon could get themselves a decent coach. Thankfully their arrogance and stupidity came to the fore
Could Paul Little have possibly done any more for opposition clubs than what he already has done? This is his final parting gift to the rest of the AFL community
I'm interested to know why you (and others) are of the opinion that Worsfold is a poor coach?
I'm interested to know why you (and others) are of the opinion that Worsfold is a poor coach?
He had a playing list, and especially a midfield group, at his disposal that was the absolute envy of the rest of the competition. Imagine having a starting midfield division of Cox, Judd, Cousins and Kerr (with numerous other quality b-graders to rotate through) and then almost coming up empty-handed in terms of premierships? That list had 'premiership era' written all over them, and yet barely a year after their 1-point flag win it was already falling apart.
I thought his match-day tactics were one-trick in nature and he was so slow at reacting when Plan A wasn't working.
They have spent the last 3 years under a drug investigation, where apparently nobody is aware of what drugs were actually utilised.
Appointing a trained pharmacist to head up the operation of the playing group makes perfect sense.
Would be a reasonable point until you consider Worsfold's overseeing of the Eagles. A number of his players are still suffering from the battering they gave themselves under Worfold's watch (Cousins, Kerr, Fletcher, Chick, Gardiner are in public domain, who knows how many more?) and he claims not to have noticed anything unusual.
My main critique of Essendon, though, is not the appointment of Worsfold, it is the manner in which they did it.
Given the events of past years, their prime concern should be governance and due process. Yet they approach Worsfold, an Adelaide employee, in a manner that contravenes standards set by AFL clubs (when sprung, they acknowledged wrongdoing and apologised to Crows) and then appoint him in a matter of days.
It is hard to believe that their 7 man selection panel (including the likes of Brad Sewell, Luke Ball, Neale Daniher etc) really conducted a rigorous due diligence of all available candidates in such a short time. The whole thing looks decidedly mickey mouse.
The whole effort from a club, who should be bending over backwards to follow all protocols to the letter, reeks of an arrogance that they should've had the decency to have lost some time ago. At least you'd think they'd have the humility to give the appearance of a thorough governance programme.
He had a playing list, and especially a midfield group, at his disposal that was the absolute envy of the rest of the competition. Imagine having a starting midfield division of Cox, Judd, Cousins and Kerr (with numerous other quality b-graders to rotate through) and then almost coming up empty-handed in terms of premierships? That list had 'premiership era' written all over them, and yet barely a year after their 1-point flag win it was already falling apart.
I thought his match-day tactics were one-trick in nature and he was so slow at reacting when Plan A wasn't working.
I can accept the second part of the above - as that is based on your view of his match day coaching - and makes sense.
On the first part, I don't know. Plenty of teams have had gun midfields, or gun forward lines and it hasn't equated to grand finals/premierships. That same team with the gun midfield, really didn't have a forward line to speak of - so from that perspective - you could say it was a good effort to win a flag. You say that he almost came up empty handed for premierships - but he also nearly won two.
He also gets no credit for building the 'premiership era' team that you speak of?
To me, its staggering that Worsfold could be regarded as a poor coach. He may not be a great coach - but to me, you simply don't get a club working towards successive grand finals if the bloke at the head of the table isn't doing plenty right.
Would be a reasonable point until you consider Worsfold's overseeing of the Eagles. A number of his players are still suffering from the battering they gave themselves under Worfold's watch (Cousins, Kerr, Fletcher, Chick, Gardiner are in public domain, who knows how many more?) and he claims not to have noticed anything unusual.
My main critique of Essendon, though, is not the appointment of Worsfold, it is the manner in which they did it.
Given the events of past years, their prime concern should be governance and due process. Yet they approach Worsfold, an Adelaide employee, in a manner that contravenes standards set by AFL clubs (when sprung, they acknowledged wrongdoing and apologised to Crows) and then appoint him in a matter of days.
It is hard to believe that their 7 man selection panel (including the likes of Brad Sewell, Luke Ball, Neale Daniher etc) really conducted a rigorous due diligence of all available candidates in such a short time. The whole thing looks decidedly mickey mouse.
The whole effort from a club, who should be bending over backwards to follow all protocols to the letter, reeks of an arrogance that they should've had the decency to have lost some time ago. At least you'd think they'd have the humility to give the appearance of a thorough governance programme.
They still just don't learn:
The Bombers were one of four AFL clubs sanctioned by the anti-doping body for failing to provide up-to-date player whereabouts information.
Comment