2016 NAB Challenge Discussion

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 9
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 template Next
  • Remi Moses
    WOOF Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 14785
    #61
    Re: 2016 NAB Challenge Discussion

    Originally posted by bornadog
    Higgins has always played well in finals. Last year in the finals, he had 28 disposals v Swans and 17 against WCoast plus two goals.

    I thought he had a great year and showed he is a classy player.
    I'll give you the Sydney game, but he wasn't great in that hawthorn game when the whips were cracking .

      Comment

      • Bornadog
        WOOF Clubhouse Leader
        • Jan 2007
        • 67298
        #62
        Re: 2016 NAB Challenge Discussion

        Originally posted by Remi Moses
        I'll give you the Sydney game, but he wasn't great in that hawthorn game when the whips were cracking .
        I don't think any player from North was, they got smashed.
        FFC: Established 1883

        Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

          Comment

          • Bulldog4life
            WOOF Member
            • Oct 2007
            • 9607
            #63
            Re: 2016 NAB Challenge Discussion

            Sandilands can accept one match ban just been announced.

              Comment

              • LostDoggy
                WOOF Member
                • Jan 2007
                • 8307
                #64
                Re: 2016 NAB Challenge Discussion

                Originally posted by Bulldog4life
                Sandilands can accept one match ban just been announced.
                Can he serve that in NAB, or would that put him out of R1?

                  Comment

                  • The Underdog
                    Bulldog Team of the Century
                    • Aug 2007
                    • 6930
                    #65
                    Re: 2016 NAB Challenge Discussion

                    Originally posted by Maddog37
                    He has always been classy but still will not chase and a hard tackle from him is the exception rather than the rule. I'm glad he is gone more so than any player we have recently lost/traded.
                    To be fair, I thought his defensive work rate for North last year was tenfold better than any season with us. Maybe it was better fitness and a full pre-season but his effort was much better.
                    Park that car
                    Drop that phone
                    Sleep on the floor
                    Dream about me

                      Comment

                      • Bulldog4life
                        WOOF Member
                        • Oct 2007
                        • 9607
                        #66
                        Re: 2016 NAB Challenge Discussion

                        Originally posted by PeanutsPeanuts
                        Can he serve that in NAB, or would that put him out of R1?
                        Round 1

                          Comment

                          • Ozza
                            Bulldog Team of the Century
                            • Mar 2008
                            • 6402
                            #67
                            Re: 2016 NAB Challenge Discussion

                            Would be a huge result for us to play Freo without Sandilands. Hope the cop the 1 week on the chin!

                              Comment

                              • LostDoggy
                                WOOF Member
                                • Jan 2007
                                • 8307
                                #68
                                Re: 2016 NAB Challenge Discussion

                                Originally posted by Bulldog4life
                                Round 1
                                Oooh. That's good. Tribunal tends to be harsh in pre-season so they may choose to take that on the chin.

                                  Comment

                                  • Cyberdoggie
                                    WOOF Member
                                    • Jan 2007
                                    • 2861
                                    #69
                                    Re: 2016 NAB Challenge Discussion

                                    Originally posted by PeanutsPeanuts
                                    Oooh. That's good. Tribunal tends to be harsh in pre-season so they may choose to take that on the chin.
                                    Campbell or Minson will be licking their lips now. Wouldn't of liked to come up against the giant first game of the year.

                                      Comment

                                      • Maddog37
                                        WOOF Member
                                        • Nov 2010
                                        • 3132
                                        #70
                                        Re: 2016 NAB Challenge Discussion

                                        Originally posted by The Underdog
                                        To be fair, I thought his defensive work rate for North last year was tenfold better than any season with us. Maybe it was better fitness and a full pre-season but his effort was much better.
                                        Honeymoon period. The change certainly helped him but leopards and spots and all that IMHO.

                                          Comment

                                          • Axe Man
                                            Hall of Fame
                                            • Nov 2008
                                            • 11317
                                            #71
                                            Re: 2016 NAB Challenge Discussion

                                            Originally posted by Bulldog4life
                                            Sandilands can accept one match ban just been announced.
                                            Great news as our ideal match up for Sandi in Brett Goodes is no longer on the list.

                                              Comment

                                              • LostDoggy
                                                WOOF Member
                                                • Jan 2007
                                                • 8307
                                                #72
                                                Re: 2016 NAB Challenge Discussion

                                                Originally posted by Axe Man
                                                Great news as our ideal match up for Sandi in Brett Goodes is no longer on the list.
                                                Another of our main options in 2015, Marcus Bontempelli, is probably quite relieved also

                                                  Comment

                                                  • GVGjr
                                                    Moderator
                                                    • Nov 2006
                                                    • 45019
                                                    #73
                                                    Re: 2016 NAB Challenge Discussion

                                                    Originally posted by PeanutsPeanuts
                                                    Can he serve that in NAB, or would that put him out of R1?
                                                    Should be round 1
                                                    Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

                                                      Comment

                                                      • Bulldog4life
                                                        WOOF Member
                                                        • Oct 2007
                                                        • 9607
                                                        #74
                                                        Re: 2016 NAB Challenge Discussion

                                                        Originally posted by GVGjr
                                                        Should be round 1
                                                        Definitely is round 1 GVG. He might appeal of course and go to the tribunal.

                                                          Comment

                                                          • Testekill
                                                            WOOF Member
                                                            • Jan 2015
                                                            • 2327
                                                            #75
                                                            Re: 2016 NAB Challenge Discussion

                                                            I can easily see him getting off, it was a really soft report.

                                                              Comment

                                                              Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 template Next
                                                              Working...