Giants set for boutique home final if they earn it

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Axe Man
    Hall of Fame
    • Nov 2008
    • 10866

    Giants set for boutique home final if they earn it

    GREATER Western Sydney would host a maiden home final at Spotless Stadium, with AFL CEO Gillon McLachlan declaring the League would not seek to move the game to a bigger venue.

    The Giants are on track to play their first final after a 4-2 start to the season, having announced their credentials with a 75-point win over reigning premier Hawthorn in round six.

    Their home ground, a boutique venue with a capacity of 24,000, is located in Sydney Olympic Park, close to the 83,500-seat ANZ Stadium.

    The Sydney Swans have played their previous seven finals at ANZ Stadium, but recently ended that arrangement and will host all finals at their SCG home.

    McLachlan said the Giants would have the same rights and would not be asked to play finals at a bigger capacity venue.

    "It would be at Spotless … that's their home ground, and if the Gold Coast Suns got a home final it would be at Metricon," McLachlan told Fox Footy on Tuesday night.

    With growing expectations on the Giants in 2016, the CEO declared it would be a remarkable result if they could win the premiership this season after finishing outside the top eight in 2015.

    GWS sits in fifth place going into round seven, with eighth-placed Hawthorn one game clear of Melbourne in ninth.

    McLachlan said he would not be concerned if the top eight was set after just six rounds, given the evenness of the competition and the variety of premiership contenders in the top eight.

    "It's a season of extraordinary interest and I don't believe it (the top eight) is set," he said.

    "I still think there are a number of teams that can make it and even if we thought it was set, anyone can win the premiership.

    "That is intriguing in itself."

    Link


    "It would be at Spotless … that's their home ground" says Gil, just like if we hosted a final it would be at Etihad because that's our home ground? The double standards are ridiculous.
  • Bornadog
    WOOF Clubhouse Leader
    • Jan 2007
    • 65577

    #2
    Re: Giants set for boutique home final if they earn it

    Two rules depending on what team you are. Yes we have to learn to play finals at MCG, but these double standards are part of the unfair thinking of the AFL and we are the ones that always cop the wrong end of the stick.
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

    Comment

    • Remi Moses
      WOOF Member
      • Jan 2009
      • 14785

      #3
      Re: Giants set for boutique home final if they earn it

      Originally posted by bornadog
      Two rules depending on what team you are. Yes we have to learn to play finals at MCG, but these double standards are part of the unfair thinking of the AFL and we are the ones that always cop the wrong end of the stick.
      BAD, The afl have not one moral fibre in their body .
      They want their manufactured plastic franchise to have ongoing success in a market where nobody cares

      Comment

      • KT31
        Bulldog Team of the Century
        • Jul 2008
        • 5454

        #4
        Re: Giants set for boutique home final if they earn it

        Nothing really amazes me with this unscrupulous, contradicting organisation.
        Why not just give the Coca-Cola teams a 10 goal head start each game and justify it as equalisation.
        It's better to die on our feet than live on our knees.

        Comment

        • 1eyedog
          Hall of Fame
          • Mar 2008
          • 13119

          #5
          Re: Giants set for boutique home final if they earn it

          I actually preferred to play our final at the G last year. Adelaide go ok at Etihad and we need as many games on the G as we can get. There were 6-8k more at the game last year than what would have fit into Etihad so I guess the decision was vindicated.
          But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.

          Comment

          • Twodogs
            Administrator
            • Nov 2006
            • 27645

            #6
            Re: Giants set for boutique home final if they earn it

            Apart from the double standard I don't care where we play finals so long as we play finals. We could play them on Mars as far as I am concerned, I will be there.
            They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

            Comment

            • Bornadog
              WOOF Clubhouse Leader
              • Jan 2007
              • 65577

              #7
              Re: Giants set for boutique home final if they earn it

              Originally posted by 1eyedog
              I actually preferred to play our final at the G last year. Adelaide go ok at Etihad and we need as many games on the G as we can get. There were 6-8k more at the game last year than what would have fit into Etihad so I guess the decision was vindicated.
              Originally posted by Twodogs
              Apart from the double standard I don't care where we play finals so long as we play finals. We could play them on Mars as far as I am concerned, I will be there.
              The point is we should get the choice and if we feel Etihad is better then so be it. Under the current system we have no choice because who we are.
              FFC: Established 1883

              Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

              Comment

              • Twodogs
                Administrator
                • Nov 2006
                • 27645

                #8
                Re: Giants set for boutique home final if they earn it

                Originally posted by bornadog
                The point is we should get the choice and if we feel Etihad is better then so be it. Under the current system we have no choice because who we are.

                yep, I'm in furious agreement.
                They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

                Comment

                • Axe Man
                  Hall of Fame
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 10866

                  #9
                  Re: Giants set for boutique home final if they earn it

                  Originally posted by 1eyedog
                  I actually preferred to play our final at the G last year. Adelaide go ok at Etihad and we need as many games on the G as we can get. There were 6-8k more at the game last year than what would have fit into Etihad so I guess the decision was vindicated.
                  Yet if GWS were to host the Swans this year they will forgo at least 20,000 because GWS must have the right to play at their home ground. It stinks. It's not just us either, I bet Geelong don't get to host another final at Kardinia Park.

                  Comment

                  • Bulldog4life
                    WOOF Member
                    • Oct 2007
                    • 9607

                    #10
                    Re: Giants set for boutique home final if they earn it

                    Originally posted by Axe Man
                    Yet if GWS were to host the Swans this year they will forgo at least 20,000 because GWS must have the right to play at their home ground. It stinks. It's not just us either, I bet Geelong don't get to host another final at Kardinia Park.
                    That hasn't been decided yet. I read earlier in the year that Geelong are pushing for it.

                    Comment

                    • Axe Man
                      Hall of Fame
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 10866

                      #11
                      Re: Giants set for boutique home final if they earn it

                      Originally posted by Bulldog4life
                      That hasn't been decided yet. I read earlier in the year that Geelong are pushing for it.
                      That's why I said I bet.

                      Geelong only got that final against Freo at the Cattery because of a scheduling anomaly. I strongly doubt the AFL will let them have another if they can avoid it. Of course Geelong are pushing for it, as we did for Etihad, but it's a waste of time because there are different rules for the AFL's state sponsored team.

                      Comment

                      • 1eyedog
                        Hall of Fame
                        • Mar 2008
                        • 13119

                        #12
                        Re: Giants set for boutique home final if they earn it

                        Agree with all the counter-arguments above. I'd be surprised if Geelong ever got a home final. There would be an uproar! 50,000 into 32,000 just doesn't go.
                        But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.

                        Comment

                        • 1eyedog
                          Hall of Fame
                          • Mar 2008
                          • 13119

                          #13
                          Re: Giants set for boutique home final if they earn it

                          Originally posted by Axe Man
                          Yet if GWS were to host the Swans this year they will forgo at least 20,000 because GWS must have the right to play at their home ground. It stinks. It's not just us either, I bet Geelong don't get to host another final at Kardinia Park.
                          Do you really think 45,000 fans would go to a GWS vs Swans final?
                          But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.

                          Comment

                          • Axe Man
                            Hall of Fame
                            • Nov 2008
                            • 10866

                            #14
                            Re: Giants set for boutique home final if they earn it

                            Originally posted by 1eyedog
                            Do you really think 45,000 fans would go to a GWS vs Swans final?
                            They had 37,000 in round 3 so yes, at least 45,000 would be likely.

                            Comment

                            Working...