I saw DRs post with a similar title and thought it was footy related, but alas it was about cricket. But it had me thinking about helmets becoming mandatory in the AFL. I know our code's footballers are tougher without them or so we perceive, but with the high concussion rates is it worth a discussion about helmets. For instance, Ted Richards was wearing a helmet for a few weeks but not last a night and copped a concussion when his head hit the ground. If he wore it again last night they'd be a much better chance he'd not have sat out the rest of the match, nor had another concussion. So in that case it was in his and the team's interest to have worn a helmet. Caleb Daniel obviously wears a helmet because of the likelihood of head high contact.
So, is it worth the AFL mandating helmets for the last half of the season and comparing concussion rates to see if the players are better off? And it being in the club's interests by being better off by not losing players for during a game or missing a week?
So, is it worth the AFL mandating helmets for the last half of the season and comparing concussion rates to see if the players are better off? And it being in the club's interests by being better off by not losing players for during a game or missing a week?
Comment