AFL Round 10 2016 Discussion

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jeemak
    Bulldog Legend
    • Oct 2010
    • 21991

    #76
    Re: AFL Round 10 2016 Discussion

    Originally posted by bornadog
    Just shows Geelong not as good as they think they are.
    Rubbish! The media has a narrative BAD, they have to be good!
    TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.

    Comment

    • Bornadog
      WOOF Clubhouse Leader
      • Jan 2007
      • 67298

      #77
      Re: AFL Round 10 2016 Discussion

      Originally posted by jeemak
      Rubbish! The media has a narrative BAD, they have to be good!
      I was listening to the pre-match to Geelong game (774) and they were talking about Geelong favourites for premiership
      FFC: Established 1883

      Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

      Comment

      • ledge
        Hall of Fame
        • Dec 2007
        • 14472

        #78
        Re: AFL Round 10 2016 Discussion

        I like the way at 3/4 time the commentators at our game said Collingwood having injured players would not affect them then when they lost it was all about the injuries !
        Bring back the biff

        Comment

        • hujsh
          Hall of Fame
          • Nov 2007
          • 11887

          #79
          Re: AFL Round 10 2016 Discussion

          Originally posted by ledge
          I like the way at 3/4 time the commentators at our game said Collingwood having injured players would not affect them then when they lost it was all about the injuries !
          I think it was Riewoldt who when asked said it wouldn't affect them because only the mids rotate (or something like that, I don't remember exactly) then half way though said it'd be a challenge to have the mids run the extra kilometer or 2.

          Just completely contradicting himself
          [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

          Comment

          • bulldogtragic
            The List Manager
            • Jan 2007
            • 34289

            #80
            Re: AFL Round 10 2016 Discussion

            Originally posted by hujsh
            I think it was Riewoldt who when asked said it wouldn't affect them because only the mids rotate (or something like that, I don't remember exactly) then half way though said it'd be a challenge to have the mids run the extra kilometer or 2.

            Just completely contradicting himself
            You take that back right now or Shane McInerney will rob us another pre-lim in retribution for what is clearly wonderfully insightful and well thought expert commentary. He clearly doesn't know what he's saying Mr McInerney. Clearly.
            Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

            Comment

            • hujsh
              Hall of Fame
              • Nov 2007
              • 11887

              #81
              Re: AFL Round 10 2016 Discussion

              Originally posted by bulldogtragic
              You take that back right now or Shane McInerney will rob us another pre-lim in retribution for what is clearly wonderfully insightful and well thought expert commentary. He clearly doesn't know what he's saying Mr McInerney. Clearly.
              Excuse me. ///I BELIEVE THAT NICOLAS PROVIDES INSIGHTFUL INSIGHT INTO THE GAME OF AFL. WHAT A CHAMPION///
              [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

              Comment

              • The Bulldogs Bite
                Hall of Fame
                • Dec 2006
                • 11333

                #82
                Re: AFL Round 10 2016 Discussion

                Originally posted by bornadog
                I was listening to the pre-match to Geelong game (774) and they were talking about Geelong favourites for premiership
                You think they are bad, I had it on K-Rock pre-game and they were talking about how easy of a game it was going to be v Carlton and how they are a powerhouse etc etc.
                W00F!

                Comment

                • bulldogtragic
                  The List Manager
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 34289

                  #83
                  Re: AFL Round 10 2016 Discussion

                  Originally posted by The Bulldogs Bite
                  You think they are bad, I had it on K-Rock pre-game and they were talking about how easy of a game it was going to be v Carlton and how they are a powerhouse etc etc.
                  Was the 3/4 time sponsor Coolaid?
                  Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

                  Comment

                  • Twodogs
                    Moderator
                    • Nov 2006
                    • 27664

                    #84
                    Re: AFL Round 10 2016 Discussion

                    Originally posted by EasternWest
                    [Insert any club] are a much better team without Liam Jones. I can't believe what a disappointment his career is/has become.

                    Look how much we've improved since he left. We were all blaming B-Mac.
                    They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

                    Comment

                    • azabob
                      Hall of Fame
                      • Sep 2008
                      • 15410

                      #85
                      Re: AFL Round 10 2016 Discussion

                      Originally posted by bulldogtragic
                      Was the 3/4 time sponsor Coolaid?
                      Koolaid
                      More of an In Bruges guy?

                      Comment

                      Working...