Should we make a play for one of these players

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bornadog
    WOOF Clubhouse Leader
    • Jan 2007
    • 66689

    #61
    Re: Should we make a play for one of these players

    Originally posted by Axe Man
    They probably still feel bad over the Steven Koops deal.
    They paid us didn't they
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

    Comment

    • Axe Man
      Hall of Fame
      • Nov 2008
      • 11152

      #62
      Re: Should we make a play for one of these players

      Originally posted by bornadog
      They paid us didn't they
      They should have.

      I bet they could barely contain their laughter when we offered pick 19 for a classic eker that had manged 78 games in 8 years and whose body was so cooked that he retired after 11 games with us.

      Of course the fact the Dockers wasted that pick on some nobody named David Mundy provides some comfort.

      Comment

      • AshMac
        WOOF Member
        • Aug 2018
        • 1712

        #63
        Re: Should we make a play for one of these players

        Mate of mine walked to the ground on Saturday w Lindsey Gilbee who made a comment about how much cap space the dogs have over the next 3 years. Surely it’s to lock bonti away for the next 90 years, but we have to be chasing a key back and another elite mid IMO.

        I’d be over the moon w Cogs, probably he best of the free agents IMO
        The dam wall has busted!

        Comment

        • bulldogtragic
          The List Manager
          • Jan 2007
          • 34289

          #64
          Re: Should we make a play for one of these players

          Just looked at Ed Langdon's 2019 stats, averaging 28 disposals, 7.7 marks, 2 tackles & no goals. Comp wide:

          Ranked 16th in Total Kicks
          Ranked 11th in Total Marks
          Ranked 8th in Total Uncontested Possessions
          Ranked 16th in Total Effective Disposals
          Ranked 10th in Total Metres Gained
          Ranked 17th in Total Turnovers
          Ranked 12th in Marks Per Game
          Ranked 10th in Uncontested Possessions Per Game
          Ranked 20th in Effective Disposals Per Game
          Ranked 14th in Metres Gained Per Game
          Ranked 20th in Turnovers Per Game

          Those are very good numbers in isolation. But he doesn't hit the scoreboard and reads like players we have, like Hunter, a wingman who can run well, not tall, not big on tackles, can accumulate good numbers and doesn't kick goals or generate plenty of goal assists. I wonder why we are fishing here over other more obvious needs?
          Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

          Comment

          • Bornadog
            WOOF Clubhouse Leader
            • Jan 2007
            • 66689

            #65
            Re: Should we make a play for one of these players

            Originally posted by bulldogtragic
            I wonder why we are fishing here over other more obvious needs?
            We need a second ruck
            FFC: Established 1883

            Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

            Comment

            • hujsh
              Hall of Fame
              • Nov 2007
              • 11839

              #66
              Re: Should we make a play for one of these players

              His highlights seem to be a couple of good tackles against Brisbane and a run around the man on the mark for a goal. I looked him up earlier as well and I think he kicked 11 goals last year which is not bad for a mid in a low scoring team.

              Honestly though I know very little about him
              [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

              Comment

              • Twodogs
                Moderator
                • Nov 2006
                • 27654

                #67
                Re: Should we make a play for one of these players

                Originally posted by Axe Man
                They should have.

                I bet they could barely contain their laughter when we offered pick 19 for a classic eker that had manged 78 games in 8 years and whose body was so cooked that he retired after 11 games with us.

                Of course the fact the Dockers wasted that pick on some nobody named David Mundy provides some comfort.
                Yeah imagine the horror if that dud Mundy had played 300 games or kicked the winning goal against us or something?
                They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

                Comment

                • FrediKanoute
                  Coaching Staff
                  • Aug 2007
                  • 3826

                  #68
                  Re: Should we make a play for one of these players

                  Originally posted by bulldogtragic
                  Just looked at Ed Langdon's 2019 stats, averaging 28 disposals, 7.7 marks, 2 tackles & no goals. Comp wide:

                  Ranked 16th in Total Kicks
                  Ranked 11th in Total Marks
                  Ranked 8th in Total Uncontested Possessions
                  Ranked 16th in Total Effective Disposals
                  Ranked 10th in Total Metres Gained
                  Ranked 17th in Total Turnovers
                  Ranked 12th in Marks Per Game
                  Ranked 10th in Uncontested Possessions Per Game
                  Ranked 20th in Effective Disposals Per Game
                  Ranked 14th in Metres Gained Per Game
                  Ranked 20th in Turnovers Per Game

                  Those are very good numbers in isolation. But he doesn't hit the scoreboard and reads like players we have, like Hunter, a wingman who can run well, not tall, not big on tackles, can accumulate good numbers and doesn't kick goals or generate plenty of goal assists. I wonder why we are fishing here over other more obvious needs?
                  A classic Supercoach player - accumulates great numbers without actually hurting anybody

                  Comment

                  • Dancin' Douggy
                    WOOF Member
                    • Oct 2007
                    • 2876

                    #69
                    Re: Should we make a play for one of these players

                    Originally posted by Axe Man
                    They should have.

                    I bet they could barely contain their laughter when we offered pick 19 for a classic eker that had manged 78 games in 8 years and whose body was so cooked that he retired after 11 games with us.

                    Of course the fact the Dockers wasted that pick on some nobody named David Mundy provides some comfort.
                    I know I know I know. I still wake up in a cold sweat now and then remembering that deal.

                    Comment

                    • Bulldog4life
                      WOOF Member
                      • Oct 2007
                      • 9607

                      #70
                      Re: Should we make a play for one of these players

                      Originally posted by Dancin' Douggy
                      I know I know I know. I still wake up in a cold sweat now and then remembering that deal.
                      I bet you don't.

                      Comment

                      Working...