AFL Round 13, 2017 Discussion
Collapse
X
-
Re: AFL Round 13, 2017 Discussion
Dare I say it but the eveness of the ladder positions are the closest they have been since 1997 seasonComment
-
Re: AFL Round 13, 2017 Discussion
What's that? 1997 you say? Go ahead, say it again. Roll it in with 1985 and do your worst.
I'm a premiership winning supporter. Those demons have been exercised!They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.Comment
-
Re: AFL Round 13, 2017 Discussion
GCS players don't really look at all interested. I'm starting to think more than ever that GCS will be what the club University is to today's youth...
A trivia question about a club that used to exist in the main competition.Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023Comment
-
Re: AFL Round 13, 2017 Discussion
Good. Can we have Harbrow back?BORDERLINE FLYINGComment
-
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023Comment
-
Re: AFL Round 13, 2017 Discussion
It's very 1997 this season . Bottom teams are going to win games .
Very Richmondy that loss, eerily similar to their loss against usComment
-
Re: AFL Round 13, 2017 Discussion
Sickening looking injury . He looked amazingly composed considering .
Another good win from Caaaaarlton . Jones has held Lynch goallessComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: AFL Round 13, 2017 Discussion
I'd say it was probably a bit of a deflating issue for GCS, but AFL these days whoever has to come back from a few down pretty much always falls just a bit short anyway.
A team gets ahead by four or five, loses concentration for a quarter or so, switches back on and nudges away. Coming back takes up a lot of effort, but when the team leading gets its act together again the effort requirement goes up a couple of notches and it's hard to keep it going.TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.Comment
Comment