MRO Thread

[Axe Man]

Re: MRO Thread

Caleb and the club have accepted the one match ban.

[Bornadog]

Re: MRO Thread

Caleb and the club have accepted the one match ban.

Totally and utterly ridiculous. The club has no hope to defend this, the AFL reporting Caleb - really they have lost the plot

[GVGjr]

Re: MRO Thread

Caleb and the club have accepted the one match ban.

One of the Brisbane supporters said it was similar to a wrestling maneuver called a DDT. He said Daniel could have gotten the 3 count.

Was there any risk in challenging it? I suspect we have reluctantly accepted that Caleb was in the wrong.

[Bornadog]

Re: MRO Thread

One of the Brisbane supporters said it was similar to a wrestling maneuver called a DDT. He said Daniel could have gotten the 3 count.

Was there any risk in challenging it? I suspect we have reluctantly accepted that Caleb was in the wrong.

Everytime we challenge we lose, so I don't blame the club.

[FrediKanoute]

Re: MRO Thread

I suspect it gives CD a week to clear his head and restart his season - hasn't had the best start.

[EasternWest]

Re: MRO Thread

It's a significant injury received by May.

From "incidental" contact.

We can't have players rubbed out for "incidental" contact.

[Happy Days]

Re: MRO Thread

One of the Brisbane supporters said it was similar to a wrestling maneuver called a DDT. He said Daniel could have gotten the 3 count.

Was there any risk in challenging it? I suspect we have reluctantly accepted that Caleb was in the wrong.

Ridiculous. Everyone knows that nobody gets up from the DDT.

[Doc26]

Re: MRO Thread

I can understand how Daniel is charged and suspended for 1 week.

What I do not understand is how Harbrow isn't at least cited for this bump on Gibbons.


https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl...41d8ec72146173

Totally agree with this.
Harbrow seemed to run slightly by the ball and went for impact instead of the footy which got Gibbons high.

[Mantis]

Re: MRO Thread

If you think we’ve been hard done by spare a thought for Norf (Cunnington)... that one has me completely puzzled.

[Bornadog]

Re: MRO Thread

If you think we’ve been hard done by spare a thought for Norf (Cunnington)... that one has me completely puzzled.

Just saw that - I have no words. Wow.

[EasternWest]

Re: MRO Thread

If you think we’ve been hard done by spare a thought for Norf (Cunnington)... that one has me completely puzzled.

Crimes against hairmanity.

[Doc26]

Re: MRO Thread

If you think we’ve been hard done by spare a thought for Norf (Cunnington)... that one has me completely puzzled.

Norf have to appeal that. What an horrendous MRO decision. They’ve completely lost the plot.

[jeemak]

Re: MRO Thread

I mean I'm happy because it's Norf, but that is genuinely disgraceful on all other fronts.

[FrediKanoute]

Re: MRO Thread

Norf have to appeal that. What an horrendous MRO decision. They’ve completely lost the plot.

I don't agree. Cunnington went the bump. Could have tried to tackle; could have tried to smother, but wen the bump and got his man high.

[Mantis]

Re: MRO Thread

I don't agree. Cunnington went the bump. Could have tried to tackle; could have tried to smother, but wen the bump and got his man high.

When you see it on the reversal angle (which I hadn't seen when I made the comment) you see the shoulder make contact with the chin, but the impact is extremely low and it shouldn't be a reportable offence.