A coronavirus-disrupted AFL season unveiled some innovations that should stay but others that should go

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dry Rot
    Bulldog Team of the Century
    • Jan 2007
    • 6465

    A coronavirus-disrupted AFL season unveiled some innovations that should stay but others that should go

    Thoughts? I do not agree with all of his conclusions

    The AFL found innovative ways to make the most of its coronavirus-interrupted season, but which ones remain in a post-pandemic environment will be debated, writes senior Grandstand AFL commentator Alister Nicholson.
    The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride.
  • Bornadog
    WOOF Clubhouse Leader
    • Jan 2007
    • 67284

    #2
    Re: A coronavirus-disrupted AFL season unveiled some innovations that should stay but others that should go

    Looking at the headings in the article:

    *No to night GF

    * No to shorter quarters

    * No to Flexible fixtures

    * No to pre finals bye

    * yes to Dreamtime in NT
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

    Comment

    • soupman
      Bulldog Team of the Century
      • Nov 2007
      • 5131

      #3
      Re: A coronavirus-disrupted AFL season unveiled some innovations that should stay but others that should go

      Originally posted by bornadog
      Looking at the headings in the article:

      *No to night GF

      * No to shorter quarters

      * No to Flexible fixtures

      * No to pre finals bye

      * yes to Dreamtime in NT
      I was expecting it to be like most of the AFL journos articles where they can't declare their love for change quick enough but really the whole article was a vote for normality (and quite in line with the average footy fan i suspect).
      I should leave it alone but you're not right

      Comment

      • azabob
        Hall of Fame
        • Sep 2008
        • 15406

        #4
        Re: A coronavirus-disrupted AFL season unveiled some innovations that should stay but others that should go

        Looking at the headings in the article

        Night GF

        A big no.

        I could live with a 3pm start.

        Shorter Quarters

        Yes - 18 minute quarters.
        Until the game becomes more attacking it needs to be reduced.
        I am finding the game was dragging big time in 2019 when there live. I wonder if this also has to do with our on field performance?

        Flexible fixtures -

        Yes for me. In 6 week blocks. This is great for TV and will ensure good games for prime time.
        AFL should strongly consider a 17 game season.

        Pre finals bye

        I have a soft spot for the pre finals bye for obvious reasons.

        Dreamtime in NT

        Makes total sense. A no brainer.
        More of an In Bruges guy?

        Comment

        • Yankee Hotel Foxtrot
          Bulldog Team of the Century
          • Jan 2007
          • 8988

          #5
          Re: A coronavirus-disrupted AFL season unveiled some innovations that should stay but others that should go

          Originally posted by azabob
          Looking at the headings in the article

          Night GF

          A big no.

          I could live with a 3pm start.

          Shorter Quarters

          Yes - 18 minute quarters.
          Until the game becomes more attacking it needs to be reduced.
          I am finding the game was dragging big time in 2019 when there live. I wonder if this also has to do with our on field performance?


          Flexible fixtures -

          Yes for me. In 6 week blocks. This is great for TV and will ensure good games for prime time.
          AFL should strongly consider a 17 game season.

          Pre finals bye

          I have a soft spot for the pre finals bye for obvious reasons.

          Dreamtime in NT

          Makes total sense. A no brainer.
          I personally think that the shorter Qtrs make the game even more defensive focused. The intent was to mean players were fresher for the compressed number of games.
          Like most changes coaches seek to make it work for them tactically irrespective of the AFLs intent. As endurance athletes a shorter Qtr just meant that coaches could press them up and down the field for a longer period of the game.
          Get the Qtrs back to 20 minutes plus time on, further restrict interchange, and l think that's our best bet to getting more scoring.

          Comment

          • Axe Man
            Hall of Fame
            • Nov 2008
            • 11305

            #6
            Re: A coronavirus-disrupted AFL season unveiled some innovations that should stay but others that should go

            There's no reason they can't have a dreamtime at the G and a dreamtime in NT in the same round is there? Send Richmond and Essendon to NT and let some other sides have the game at the G.

            Comment

            • Bornadog
              WOOF Clubhouse Leader
              • Jan 2007
              • 67284

              #7
              Re: A coronavirus-disrupted AFL season unveiled some innovations that should stay but others that should go

              Originally posted by azabob
              Flexible fixtures -

              Yes for me. In 6 week blocks. This is great for TV and will ensure good games for prime time.
              AFL should strongly consider a 17 game season.
              A couple of things for me on this one.

              1. Supporters like to book ahead their travel plans so they can lock in cheap flights/accommodation etc.

              2. I can see the TV stations manipulating this so they have Collingwood/Richmond and other big clubs on every single Friday night. I am a firm believer that TV exposure should be shared around.

              On the 17 games, for me the season becomes too short. 22 games is about right, but the fixture should be that teams get to play each other twice over a period of 4 years and there shouldn't be manipulation of the draw like it is now eg 4 VIC teams playing each other twice each year to create an artificial blockbuster.

              Also, be prepared to significantly reduce income from broadcast rights if 5 fewer games are played.
              FFC: Established 1883

              Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

              Comment

              • Ozza
                Bulldog Team of the Century
                • Mar 2008
                • 6402

                #8
                Re: A coronavirus-disrupted AFL season unveiled some innovations that should stay but others that should go

                Night Grand Final is an emphatic 'no' for me. I know all us Melbournians were locked down - but it still felt very different and not for the better. If the AFL Grand Final is going to be an event that is out of reach to attend for most people and families, then the least they can do is make it accessible for families on TV. Just thinking about the GF parties/barbeques all over the state and country normally - it is so much easier for families to do this throughout he afternoon and into the early evening.

                Shorter quarters - I think 18 mins might be the right compromise. The game was marginally too short this year, but I can agree that it was a little long before.

                Floating Fixture - happy with this but I think 8 week blocks gives people enough time to book.

                Pre-Finals bye - against the majority I know, but I'm fine with it. If there is a chance to get the best players on the field and ready to go for the finals, and freshen up players a bit to put on the best spectacle, then I can live with one weekend off footy.

                Dreamtime at the G - probably don't have a strong opinion as to where its played - as its an Essendon/Richmond game that I've never gone to.

                Comment

                • Bornadog
                  WOOF Clubhouse Leader
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 67284

                  #9
                  Re: A coronavirus-disrupted AFL season unveiled some innovations that should stay but others that should go

                  Originally posted by Ozza
                  Pre-Finals bye - against the majority I know, but I'm fine with it. If there is a chance to get the best players on the field and ready to go for the finals, and freshen up players a bit to put on the best spectacle, then I can live with one weekend off footy.
                  One issue is the top teams can end up playing one game in a month. Are you happy with that?
                  FFC: Established 1883

                  Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

                  Comment

                  • soupman
                    Bulldog Team of the Century
                    • Nov 2007
                    • 5131

                    #10
                    Re: A coronavirus-disrupted AFL season unveiled some innovations that should stay but others that should go

                    Originally posted by bornadog

                    2. I can see the TV stations manipulating this so they have Collingwood/Richmond and other big clubs on every single Friday night.
                    How is this any different to what has been happening for years? At least in this scenario we get whichever of the big clubs is good instead of Carlton 7 Fridays straight.

                    I also agree the games need to be shared around, but seeing as the AFL can't see the forest for the trees anyway this is better than them giving Essendon 6 Fridays for the season before realising they are shit.
                    I should leave it alone but you're not right

                    Comment

                    • Bornadog
                      WOOF Clubhouse Leader
                      • Jan 2007
                      • 67284

                      #11
                      Re: A coronavirus-disrupted AFL season unveiled some innovations that should stay but others that should go

                      Originally posted by soupaman
                      How is this any different to what has been happening for years? At least in this scenario we get whichever of the big clubs is good instead of Carlton 7 Fridays straight.

                      I also agree the games need to be shared around, but seeing as the AFL can't see the forest for the trees anyway this is better than them giving Essendon 6 Fridays for the season before realising they are shit.
                      I can agree with that - just stinks the current setup.
                      FFC: Established 1883

                      Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

                      Comment

                      • DOG GOD
                        Bulldog Team of the Century
                        • Jul 2007
                        • 6593

                        #12
                        Re: A coronavirus-disrupted AFL season unveiled some innovations that should stay but others that should go

                        Night Grand Final is a big fat NO. I hated it. The day dragged, and the game just felt like a normal Saturday night game. I know it was under COVID circumstances, but it should always be an MCG day game.

                        Shorter quarters - I personally liked this. I do agree with a possible 18 min quarter.

                        Floating Fixture - if it’s a 22 round game, I’d like to see the first 11 games announced first, and then about round 6-7 the remainder announced.

                        Pre-Finals bye - it helped us no doubt and I’d like to see it stay, although it does tend to make the season lose a bit of momentum, so 50/50 on this.

                        Dreamtime at the G - no real opinion on this, but no way does the AFL move the MCG game to Darwin.
                        I will never see #16 the same!!

                        Comment

                        • comrade
                          Hall of Fame
                          • Jun 2008
                          • 18093

                          #13
                          Re: A coronavirus-disrupted AFL season unveiled some innovations that should stay but others that should go

                          Night GF - definitely not.

                          Shorter quarters - I prefer longer games. Rewards the grinders like Macrae and Hunter.

                          Floating fixture - yeah, fine.

                          Pre-finals bye - I'm ambivalent on this. Liked it in 2016 obviously but it is a momentum killer.

                          Dreamtime in NT - no reason one can't be played at the MCG and in NT on the same weekend.
                          Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.

                          Comment

                          • bulldogsthru&thru
                            Bulldog Team of the Century
                            • May 2011
                            • 7906

                            #14
                            Re: A coronavirus-disrupted AFL season unveiled some innovations that should stay but others that should go

                            Night GF - To be honest I couldn't care one way or another. The pre-game and half-time was way better at night and it allowed me to actually do stuff during the day. There's plenty of things to do on a given saturday so we shouldn't have to "sit around" as such. Dealing with change is a necessity in life and we'd all adapt. I do understand the family component though.

                            Shorter quarters - Don't want 16 but would be happy with 18 or 20. Ideally we keep it at 20 if the AFL is brave enough to implement ways to get the game moving faster.

                            Floating fixture - Doesn't bother me but I do prefer knowing in advance which games I can attend.

                            Pre-finals bye - I don't like the momentum kill but it certainly makes the first week of finals a far better spectacle. Having the best ready to go is a huge plus. I'd prefer it stay but the implications of the top teams having two weeks off in a 4 weeks span is far from ideal.

                            Dreamtime in NT - Do one in NT and another at the G.

                            Comment

                            • soupman
                              Bulldog Team of the Century
                              • Nov 2007
                              • 5131

                              #15
                              Re: A coronavirus-disrupted AFL season unveiled some innovations that should stay but others that should go

                              Night GF: Hate it. Makes all the cultural traditions around the event harder to execute and fits perfectly with the theme of the AFL where they keep making changes that aren't for the fans. Not ideal for families, and I really enjoy having such a major event during the day when basically every other event in our lives occurs in the evening.

                              Shorter Quarters: Not a fan. I would like the full 20 minute quarters back but expect 18.

                              Floating Fixture: With plenty of notice sure why not. It hopefully means teams in the second half of the year will get timeslots more on merit than reputation. Like BAD I'd ideally like the AFL to share the games around more and help give smaller clubs exposure but i guess with a floating fixture at least we are only forced to watch the good "big" clubs in prime time. I watch most games anyway so doesn't make too big a difference personally.

                              Pre-Finals Bye: I like that it gives every team the best opportunity to field a full strength side which is definitely something we should be trying to do, although I can concede it may be a bit disruptive to the flow into finals. An alternative could be to have a split round a couple of weeks out from finals, so in a 23 round season maybe round 20 or 21. It gives teams that week to take stock before they enter than final run of games, means games flow into finals well, and the weekends could be filled out with other events (ie. A women's rep game, U18 clash). The downside would be it could prolong the death of the shit teams seasons but otherwise i feel it could capture the best of both worlds, a rest that doesn't negatively impact finals.

                              Dreamtime in NT: Like others are saying why not both?

                              Additional VAR/Goal Review: If you want to make quarters not feel like they are dragging so much why don't we put a 20 second time limit on goal reviews? If it's not clear within that timespan then bad luck umpires call. Makes them less disruptive and prevents us spending over a minute trying to spot a change in the blur.
                              Last edited by soupman; 27-10-2020, 02:40 PM.
                              I should leave it alone but you're not right

                              Comment

                              Working...