Shorter Games
Collapse
X
-
Re: Shorter Games
There are plenty of options to shorten game time with out actually shortening games.
What about we get rid of the stupid ruck nomination and just throw the ball up. That would take about 2 minutes off every quarter.
We can also get rid of the goal review and saves heaps of time. Trust the guy given the job.
Plus adjudicate the holding the ball instead of allowing every player to just roll into a tackle and wait for the ball up.Life is to be Enjoyed not EnduredComment
-
Don't piss off old people
The older we get the less "LIFE IN PRISON" is a deterrent...Comment
-
Re: Shorter Games
There are plenty of options to shorten game time with out actually shortening games.
What about we get rid of the stupid ruck nomination and just throw the ball up. That would take about 2 minutes off every quarter.
We can also get rid of the goal review and saves heaps of time. Trust the guy given the job.
Plus adjudicate the holding the ball instead of allowing every player to just roll into a tackle and wait for the ball up.Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"Comment
-
Re: Shorter Games
There are plenty of options to shorten game time with out actually shortening games.
What about we get rid of the stupid ruck nomination and just throw the ball up. That would take about 2 minutes off every quarter.
We can also get rid of the goal review and saves heaps of time. Trust the guy given the job.
Plus adjudicate the holding the ball instead of allowing every player to just roll into a tackle and wait for the ball up.Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.Comment
-
Re: Shorter Games
Scott wants to shorten the actual playing time, not just the overall duration of the game. Tweaking reviews, ruck nominations etc isn't enough for him because that doesn't reduce the playing time. He doesn't want his players having to run and compete for as long as they currently have to.
In fact he probably wouldn't want the above changes (most I agree with) because it gives his guys less of a breather.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Comment
-
Re: Shorter Games
Correct, I'm sure he'll take the 16 min quarters of actual playing time with all the extra bells and whistles. Game length isn't his problem, playing time is but he can't out and say 'our squad is old and suited to shorter quarters'.Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: Shorter Games
Shorter games might have been an OK concept in a condensed season but the standard of footy has been very good this year and there is no reason to shorten the quarters. Captain Mainwairing will need to work how to use some of the players like Constable, Narkle and Clark so they can add some fresher legs to his Dads Army.
To think his brother is a candidate to replace Steve Hocking is a scary option.
He's not even being remotely transparent here. Shorter games benefit his team with their current profile.
They wouldn't have been anywhere NEAR the grand final last year in a proper season.Comment
-
Re: Shorter Games
Geelong the oldest team in history and Scott wants to save their old legs.
Leave the game aloneFFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.Comment
-
Re: Shorter Games
Bevo was asked about this and basically said any changes would need to be collaborative, based on data and that decisions shouldn't be made so 'one or two people get their way'. Well deserved backhander for Chris Scott.Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.Comment
-
Comment
-
Western Bulldogs: 2016 PremiersComment
Comment