If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
What happens if you have too many injuries to name a full squad?
Re: What happens if you have too many injuries to name a full squad?
Well they have enough players just not the players that they want to play.
But it is an interesting question and I suppose you play short or if the other side is nice will reduce their squad to match.
Also maybe the AFL has to get involved and if there is reduced players on the field maybe the length of the quarters could be shorten just for that game.
Don't piss off old people
The older we get the less "LIFE IN PRISON" is a deterrent...
Re: What happens if you have too many injuries to name a full squad?
Put a baby Saints jumper on witches hats. I know that’s an upgrade on many of their players. But it seems the right thing to do.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
Re: What happens if you have too many injuries to name a full squad?
Originally posted by Hotdog60
Well they have enough players just not the players that they want to play.
But it is an interesting question and I suppose you play short or if the other side is nice will reduce their squad to match.
Also maybe the AFL has to get involved and if there is reduced players on the field maybe the length of the quarters could be shorten just for that game.
It’s too bad being sensible about it. Freo had 5 injuries in the end and so no one on the bench. It’s bad luck. It’s no different except Saints know about it in advance. I don’t want a precedent to change things. I wouldn’t want us to reduce our team if we were playing them. They just need to do the best with what they have.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
Re: What happens if you have too many injuries to name a full squad?
Originally posted by bulldogtragic
It’s too bad being sensible about it. Freo had 5 injuries in the end and so no one on the bench. It’s bad luck. It’s no different except Saints know about it in advance. I don’t want a precedent to change things. I wouldn’t want us to reduce our team if we were playing them. They just need to do the best with what they have.
I agree with your comments and it would be just tough luck but I did say if the other side was nice, I'd be a bastard.
Don't piss off old people
The older we get the less "LIFE IN PRISON" is a deterrent...
Re: What happens if you have too many injuries to name a full squad?
You play injured players. If it's good enough to do in a do or die final - where aside from what chest beating coaches say - players play injured, then it's good enough to do in a home and away game.
Reckon Morris plays with a broken back in round 12.......well of course, it's a bad example because the dude's a *!*!*!*!ing psycho, but you get my drift.
TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.
Re: What happens if you have too many injuries to name a full squad?
The reason why you have to keep a straight line on the rules is pretty much the same as why teams like ours forego home ground revenue in lockdown. If stiff shit rules apply to one element of the game, then stiff shit rules should apply to other elements of the game.
We can't control St Kilda's injury management, only they can (or any other team). We know that teams field players with injuries when they think they're better off doing so, that means unfortunately you either let it slide or make a blanket rule that if a player gets a certain type of injury they're out for a mandated time and that's not acceptable.
No offence DR, but this isn't an issue, in my view.
TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.
Re: What happens if you have too many injuries to name a full squad?
Originally posted by jeemak
You play injured players. If it's good enough to do in a do or die final - where aside from what chest beating coaches say - players play injured, then it's good enough to do in a home and away game.
Reckon Morris plays with a broken back in round 12.......well of course, it's a bad example because the dude's a *!*!*!*!ing psycho, but you get my drift.
Spot on. Morris is a freak but for most mere mortals there will come a point where they have to understand if the are hurt or injured.
If you are hurt you play the game, if you are injured you can't.
Also 2 of Saints injuries are essentially parental leave
Re: What happens if you have too many injuries to name a full squad?
Originally posted by mjp
The mid-season draft was last week...couldn't they have resolved the situation then?
Yep. They had 4 picks and only used 2.
I think I’m missing something here. They definitely have enough for a 22 and seemingly enough for 4 emergencies, just not emergencies they want to play. They also had two guys voluntarily sack playing this week, which, while not casting aspersions on their reasons for doing so, shouldn’t mean they get granted a special exemption to do something they could’ve done last week and chose not to.
- I'm a visionary - Only here to confirm my biases -
Comment