Confirmed Trades 2022

[Bornadog]

Re: Confirmed Trades 2022

All the confirmed trades

https://www.afl.com.au/trade/trade-tracker

[Bornadog]

Re: Confirmed Trades 2022

[bulldogtragic]

Re: Confirmed Trades 2022

GWS not bidding on Ashcroft.

[Grantysghost]

Re: Confirmed Trades 2022

GWS not bidding on Ashcroft.

North will you'd expect.

[bulldogtragic]

Re: Confirmed Trades 2022

North will you'd expect.

Doesn’t matter. They parted with 194 DPs. By GWS not bidding they save about 400 DPs, even if North bid.

[GVGjr]

Re: Confirmed Trades 2022

Trade paperwork lodged.
North Melbourne trade its Round Three Selection (43) to Fremantle for its Future Round Four Selection (tied to Hawthorn).

[Bulldog Revolution]

Re: Confirmed Trades 2022

Trade paperwork lodged.
North Melbourne trade its Round Three Selection (43) to Fremantle for its Future Round Four Selection (tied to Hawthorn).

So an early round 3 pick for a likely early round 4 pick

Is this a Sweetener to accompany early trades between the parties - Tucker and Logue?

[GVGjr]

Re: Confirmed Trades 2022

So an early round 3 pick for a likely early round 4 pick

Is this a Sweetener to accompany early trades between the parties - Tucker and Logue?

Hard to know but it seems to be a bad deal for North.

[Bulldog Joe]

Re: Confirmed Trades 2022

Hard to know but it seems to be a bad deal for North.

North currently have 2,3 and 23.
Perhaps they are not intending to use any more than that but will look for mature agers to fill the list.

[Grantysghost]

Re: Confirmed Trades 2022

So an early round 3 pick for a likely early round 4 pick

Is this a Sweetener to accompany early trades between the parties - Tucker and Logue?

The answer is yes and it’s pretty average collusion.

[Bulldog Revolution]

Re: Confirmed Trades 2022

Hard to know but it seems to be a bad deal for North.

North currently have 2,3 and 23.
Perhaps they are not intending to use any more than that but will look for mature agers to fill the list.

Yes it does, which is why I asked the question GVG.

Even if they weren't using the pick, as Bulldog Joe has suggested, it still seems like they've sold it for too little - they likely could have got a future third rounder couldn't they?

The answer is yes and it’s pretty average collusion.

It looks very suspect to me GG

[Happy Days]

Re: Confirmed Trades 2022

They’re going to pick Boomer Harvey’s kid with their last pick, so wanted to trade out of a pick they don’t have to use for an asset in next year’s draft.

Even if the logic is sound it still feels like cents on the dollar. Feel like one of the good teams would’ve given up a future 3rd but what do I know.

[Dogs 24/7]

Re: Confirmed Trades 2022

They’re going to pick Boomer Harvey’s kid with their last pick, so wanted to trade out of a pick they don’t have to use for an asset in next year’s draft.

Even if the logic is sound it still feels like cents on the dollar. Feel like one of the good teams would’ve given up a future 3rd but what do I know.

Thanks for filling in the blanks.

[divvydan]

Re: Confirmed Trades 2022

Recruiters who have spoken publicly seem to be thinking that next year's draft is going to be strong, so I can imagine that makes every pick from next year worth more than it otherwise would.

[Grantysghost]

Re: Confirmed Trades 2022

They’re going to pick Boomer Harvey’s kid with their last pick, so wanted to trade out of a pick they don’t have to use for an asset in next year’s draft.

Even if the logic is sound it still feels like cents on the dollar. Feel like one of the good teams would’ve given up a future 3rd but what do I know.

It does feel a stretch. I mean Freos fourth rounder will likely be a pick in the mid 60s to 70s.