If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I only saw the last quarter but regrettably it’s clear Geelong’s defence are still very strong. Freo just couldn’t get past them in a longish period where there was only a goal in it. They set up so well.There is something flakey about Freo, evident last week vs Bombres too.
[url]www.bulldogtragician.com[/url] A blog about being a lifelong fan of the Dogs and our quixotic attempt to replicate 1954. AND WE DID
Author of [URL="http://www.blackincbooks.com.au/books/mighty-west"]"The Mighty West: the Bulldogs journey from daydream believers to premiership heroes[/URL]"
Twitter @bulldogstragic
Geelong were very impressive in that last quarter. Freo were bbeaten badly around the ball and in the air although their forwards were not helped by some very poor delivery inside 50.
[URL="http://journals.worldnomads.com/merantau"]http://journals.worldnomads.com/merantau[/URL]
"It's not about the destination - it's about the trip."
After an outside five, protected area or over the mark transgression was committed then the interpretation is what it is, and if you decide a transgression was committed it would be easy to say it's 25m instead of 50m.
Changing it from 50m to 25m is a simple directive that doesn't rely on an interpretation. I'm saying what you're saying.
But if you want trouble I can easily just agree with Bulldog Joe and start picking on you.
TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.
Comment