The Monday Soapbox - Finals Edition

[GVGjr]

Time to get on to your soapbox.

[Grantysghost]

Re: The Monday Soapbox - Finals Edition

Our House.

They were right - and it made me SICK!

Lions finish 5th. Home game - total advantage.
Dogs finish 6th. Home game - total disadvantage.

Marvel tenants are buggered.

The only thing that balances it all for me is that the 2016 GF following my logic should have been in Sydney (we still would have won !!).

[Bornadog]

Re: The Monday Soapbox - Finals Edition

The bye round - we lost our momentum

[bulldogtragic]

Re: The Monday Soapbox - Finals Edition

The bye round - we lost our momentum

I thought we were 4 goals to 2 up at quarter time. I thought we started fine enough. We shit the bed. Not sure momentum had anything to do with it.

[Bornadog]

Re: The Monday Soapbox - Finals Edition

I thought we were 4 goals to 2 up at quarter time. I thought we started fine enough. We shit the bed. Not sure momentum had anything to do with it.

We were lack lustre. Go back to the North game after the bye and see a similar situation where we struggled with them - lucky they aren't a good team

[GVGjr]

Re: The Monday Soapbox - Finals Edition

The bye round - we lost our momentum

The Hawks had a bye as well. If we assume what you say has merit why is it a challenge for us and not others?
I can get reasons why some players might not getting up for an encounter against North but justifying it for a final after missing last year doesn't sound plausible.

[bulldogtragic]

Re: The Monday Soapbox - Finals Edition

We were lack lustre. Go back to the North game after the bye and see a similar situation where we struggled with them - lucky they aren't a good team

Can’t really buy this. We were leading in the second quarter and dropped our bundle. If Bevo can’t start seasons well and can’t get teams up after a bye then what’s the point of following the club? We need to bank early wins (we don’t tend to do) and if we play finals ww have multiple byes a year. If we get good teams after a bye then pencil in two losses. But to my original point, we started well enough.

[Bornadog]

Re: The Monday Soapbox - Finals Edition

Can’t really buy this. We were leading in the second quarter and dropped our bundle. If Bevo can’t start seasons well and can’t get teams up after a bye then what’s the point of following the club? We need to bank early wins (we don’t tend to do) and if we play finals ww have multiple byes a year. If we get good teams after a bye then pencil in two losses. But to my original point, we started well enough.

I gave you my Monday soapbox and I am sticking with it.

[Sedat]

Re: The Monday Soapbox - Finals Edition

Can?t really buy this. We were leading in the second quarter and dropped our bundle. If Bevo can?t start seasons well and can?t get teams up after a bye then what?s the point of following the club? We need to bank early wins (we don?t tend to do) and if we play finals ww have multiple byes a year. If we get good teams after a bye then pencil in two losses. But to my original point, we started well enough.

In the last 10 minutes of the 1st qtr we dominated clearance and territory for the only time in the game - at 1/4 time we should have been well pleased having countered Hawthorn's good start (first 30 seconds aside) and we got the game played back on our terms. That evaporated a few minutes into the 2nd and became deeply embarrassing in the 3rd.

Talk of umpiring (yeah it was a bit rubbish) and especially the bye is the ultimate losers limp. Even worse, I especially hated the commentary around "there must have been something wrong with Bont" post game - that was deeply embarrassing for anyone in the media who uttered such trash, and very insulting to Nash and the Hawks brains trust who expertly picked Bont apart on the night. As a club we need to take our medicine after delivering such a below par performance at the most important time of the season, and get better in all facets in 2025. No excuses for anyone, just get it done.

[bulldogtragic]

Re: The Monday Soapbox - Finals Edition

I gave you my Monday soapbox and I am sticking with it.

That’s fine, I’m not asking you to change it. Just I can’t see where you are coming from and was trying to.

[bulldogtragic]

Re: The Monday Soapbox - Finals Edition

In the last 10 minutes of the 1st qtr we dominated clearance and territory for the only time in the game - at 1/4 time we should have been well pleased having countered Hawthorn's good start (first 30 seconds aside) and we got the game played back on our terms. That evaporated a few minutes into the 2nd and became deeply embarrassing in the 3rd.

Talk of umpiring (yeah it was a bit rubbish) and especially the bye is the ultimate losers limp. We need to take our medicine after delivering such a below par performance at the most important time of the season, and get better in all facets in 2025. No excuses, just get it done.

I need to see what happens at the trade table. I’m not yet convinced there’s enough natural progresssion in this list to assume finals are a certainty next year. I agree we need to improve in all facets, but I think personnel is going to be more important than normal. If we can get some players that address needs that’s going to be great. If not, I’m concerned.

[EasternWest]

Re: The Monday Soapbox - Finals Edition

I'm as concerned about the "Marra can be the next Buddy" as I was about the "Stringer is the next Ablett" palaver that went on when he was emerging.

[GVGjr]

Re: The Monday Soapbox - Finals Edition

I'm as concerned about the "Marra can be the next Buddy" as I was about the "Stringer is the next Ablett" palaver that went on when he was emerging.

I'm not a fan of player comparisons. We know Marra's best is exceptionally good and we've seen that if he's not switched on it can look ordinary. It's okay to say he has Buddy like abilities ie tall, rangy and long kick etc but comparisons to one of the best ever are premature and not warranted.

[Grantysghost]

Re: The Monday Soapbox - Finals Edition

I'm not a fan of player comparisons. We know Marra's best is exceptionally good and we've seen that if he's not switched on it can look ordinary. It's okay to say he has Buddy like abilities ie tall, rangy and long kick etc but comparisons to one of the best ever are premature and not warranted.

If we are being honest, the only likeness is they're both incredible indigenous athletes.

It's shallow and frankly embarrassing that this is pushed so hard by the contemptuous AFL media.

Buddy is incomparable. Marra is forging his own path.

[GVGjr]

Re: The Monday Soapbox - Finals Edition

If we are being honest, the only likeness is they're both incredible indigenous athletes.

It's shallow and frankly embarrassing that this is pushed so hard by the contemptuous AFL media.

Buddy is incomparable. Marra is forging his own path.

Fully agree. Lets see where Marra and his unique skill set takes us.