Re: Round 18 Talk
Why don't media outlets require that their commentators/experts know the rules of the game? On Channel 10, Blight, Darcy, Christian and Hudson are all accusing a boundary umpire of a monumental error because the ball has bounced outside the boundary line and not been called out. But the ball was leaning back towards the boundary line when it bounced and then subsequently bounced back into the field of play. If any part of the ball remained in play, ie it was inside the outside edge of the line (just a millimeter is sufficient) then the whole ball is deemed to have stayed in play. In this case it is quite possible that even though the lower tip of the ball where it bounced is over the line, the upper tip of the ball stayed in play. This would mean that the umpire was correct to call play on. Of course it does depend on your line of sight, but that is the case for every decision.
Why don't media outlets require that their commentators/experts know the rules of the game? On Channel 10, Blight, Darcy, Christian and Hudson are all accusing a boundary umpire of a monumental error because the ball has bounced outside the boundary line and not been called out. But the ball was leaning back towards the boundary line when it bounced and then subsequently bounced back into the field of play. If any part of the ball remained in play, ie it was inside the outside edge of the line (just a millimeter is sufficient) then the whole ball is deemed to have stayed in play. In this case it is quite possible that even though the lower tip of the ball where it bounced is over the line, the upper tip of the ball stayed in play. This would mean that the umpire was correct to call play on. Of course it does depend on your line of sight, but that is the case for every decision.
Comment