Round 3 Discussion

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • G-Mo77
    Bulldog Team of the Century
    • Apr 2007
    • 9894

    Round 3 Discussion

    Collingwood actually looked under the pump for quite a while. Carlton seemed to relax a little in the 2nd and find themselves in a 4 goal hole at half time.

    Let's discuss Round 3.
  • comrade
    Hall of Fame
    • Jun 2008
    • 18093

    #2
    Re: Round 3 Discussion

    Collingwood's ability to go to another level after a tense period is the hallmark of a champion side. They mentioned on the telecast that Brisbane also had this ability. So did Geelong.

    I've been reasonably impressed with Carlton though. They've looked dangerous when kicking long and deep on the rebound. From a Bulldogs perspective, throwing Brian forward will definitely need to be looked at to try and stretch their defence.

    Having Markovic as a genuine key defensive cover might be handy.
    Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.

    Comment

    • The Coon Dog
      Bulldog Team of the Century
      • Jan 2007
      • 7579

      #3
      Re: Round 3 Discussion

      Gee its hard to tell the difference between the 2 teams, particularly the socks. What's the use in having a policy to avoid such clashes if its not going to be enforced?
      [COLOR="Red"][B][U][COLOR="Blue"]85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse![/COLOR][/U][/B][/COLOR]

      Comment

      • GVGjr
        Moderator
        • Nov 2006
        • 45007

        #4
        Re: Round 3 Discussion

        Originally posted by The Coon Dog
        Gee its hard to tell the difference between the 2 teams, particularly the socks. What's the use in having a policy to avoid such clashes if its not going to be enforced?

        The stronger clubs tell them to get stuffed and the AFL back down and won't enforce anything. We do what we are asked.
        Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

        Comment

        • LostDoggy
          WOOF Member
          • Jan 2007
          • 8307

          #5
          Re: Round 3 Discussion

          Originally posted by The Coon Dog
          Gee its hard to tell the difference between the 2 teams, particularly the socks. What's the use in having a policy to avoid such clashes if its not going to be enforced?
          You're right. Collingwood change to black backs just to get one over port should never been allowed.

          Comment

          • LostDoggy
            WOOF Member
            • Jan 2007
            • 8307

            #6
            Re: Round 3 Discussion

            Same old Carlton for me. Poor defense, rucks iffy. Like Yarran and Garrlett but Betts is horrible

            Comment

            • The Coon Dog
              Bulldog Team of the Century
              • Jan 2007
              • 7579

              #7
              Re: Round 3 Discussion

              Originally posted by Chops
              Same old Carlton for me. Poor defense, rucks iffy. Like Yarran and Garrlett but Betts is horrible
              He hits the ball at speed, doesn't he?
              [COLOR="Red"][B][U][COLOR="Blue"]85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse![/COLOR][/U][/B][/COLOR]

              Comment

              • The Pie Man
                Coaching Staff
                • May 2008
                • 3500

                #8
                Re: Round 3 Discussion

                Originally posted by Chops
                You're right. Collingwood change to black backs just to get one over port should never been allowed.
                Or at least revert to their old (clash) strip against Carlton
                Float Along - Fill Your Lungs

                Comment

                • Remi Moses
                  WOOF Member
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 14785

                  #9
                  Re: Round 3 Discussion

                  Oh FFS why in he'll is it a problem for these teams to wear a bloody clash strip!
                  If it's bloody good enough for iconic sporting teams to wear a clash strip why in hell isn't it okay for bloody domestic Footy teams. Suppose we'll get the usual Dogs bollox about tradition and constitutions. Players don't perform any differently with a clash strip on,and it's utter tripe that it wasn't a problem previously as the game is hundred miles an hour quicker and has 30 players around the contest.

                  Afl stop Being s*** frightened of the big boys!!

                  Comment

                  • Bornadog
                    WOOF Clubhouse Leader
                    • Jan 2007
                    • 67291

                    #10
                    Re: Round 3 Discussion

                    Originally posted by Remi Moses
                    Oh FFS why in he'll is it a problem for these teams to wear a bloody clash strip!
                    If it's bloody good enough for iconic sporting teams to wear a clash strip why in hell isn't it okay for bloody domestic Footy teams. Suppose we'll get the usual Dogs bollox about tradition and constitutions. Players don't perform any differently with a clash strip on,and it's utter tripe that it wasn't a problem previously as the game is hundred miles an hour quicker and has 30 players around the contest.

                    Afl stop Being s*** frightened of the big boys!!
                    For over a hundred years we had clubs wearing white shorts and black shorts now its an issue. Why can't we all wear our tradditional colours?
                    FFC: Established 1883

                    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

                    Comment

                    • Dry Rot
                      Bulldog Team of the Century
                      • Jan 2007
                      • 6465

                      #11
                      Re: Round 3 Discussion

                      WCE v Swans: anyone just see that goal from Jetta? Goal of the Year IMO. Amazing.
                      The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride.

                      Comment

                      • chef
                        Hall of Fame
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 14696

                        #12
                        Re: Round 3 Discussion

                        Originally posted by bornadog
                        For over a hundred years we had clubs wearing white shorts and black shorts now its an issue. Why can't we all wear our tradditional colours?
                        Because it's crap to watch the game when you cant make out which team is which.
                        The curse is dead.

                        Comment

                        • Remi Moses
                          WOOF Member
                          • Jan 2009
                          • 14785

                          #13
                          Re: Round 3 Discussion

                          Originally posted by bornadog
                          For over a hundred years we had clubs wearing white shorts and black shorts now its an issue. Why can't we all wear our tradditional colours?
                          It's an issue because the game has 30 players around the ball and is frantic where as previously it was one on one and a lot slower.
                          Teams have changed their colors back panels constantly (even Collingwood Richmond and Hawthorn)

                          Comment

                          • Remi Moses
                            WOOF Member
                            • Jan 2009
                            • 14785

                            #14
                            Re: Round 3 Discussion

                            Observations from Round 3
                            Collingwood played Carlton like a cat plays with a ball of wool.
                            Richmond being outclassed by a team on form is Collingwood's only challenger(early days)
                            Sydney and West Coast playing their usual ball up stoppage slogothon
                            Sydney look a key defender short with Everitt playing key back (ouch!)loss of Bolton is going to hurt.
                            Adelaide is the big surprise throughly outplayed by Freo( just puts into perspective that you take notice of Round 1)

                            Comment

                            • Bornadog
                              WOOF Clubhouse Leader
                              • Jan 2007
                              • 67291

                              #15
                              Re: Round 3 Discussion

                              Originally posted by chef
                              Because it's crap to watch the game when you cant make out which team is which.
                              Originally posted by Remi Moses
                              It's an issue because the game has 30 players around the ball and is frantic where as previously it was one on one and a lot slower.
                              Teams have changed their colors back panels constantly (even Collingwood Richmond and Hawthorn)
                              Wasn't a problem when everyone wore their traditional colours, instead of black backs etc. No problems in the 70's and 80's or even the 90's.
                              FFC: Established 1883

                              Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

                              Comment

                              Working...