Round 4 Discussion

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LostDoggy
    WOOF Member
    • Jan 2007
    • 8307

    #31
    Re: Round 4 Discussion

    Originally posted by Greystache
    Essendon have 10,000 members this year that didn't sign up last year. 55 points suggests they're not worse than us.
    Yes we were better than Essendon in 2000 and Geelong in 2007 as well cos we beat them those years too. Most memebership are sold pre-season before the round 1 game anyway. Essendon have a membership record this season. If they are missing members from last year it got more to do the clubs treatment of Knights and the dishonesty of the club/Hird and Thompson than disloyal fans.

    Originally posted by Greystache
    10 year, 200 game veteran?? Did he only start copping it this year??
    He started copping it when fans like yourself need a scapegoat. The 10 years and 200 games tells you he isn't as bad as many think.

    Comment

    • Greystache
      Bulldog Team of the Century
      • Dec 2009
      • 9775

      #32
      Re: Round 4 Discussion

      Originally posted by Chops
      Yes we were better than Essendon in 2000 and Geelong in 2007 as well cos we beat them those years too. Most memebership are sold pre-season before the round 1 game anyway. Essendon have a membership record this season. If they are missing members from last year it got more to do the clubs treatment of Knights and the dishonesty of the club/Hird and Thompson than disloyal fans.
      Incoherent.

      Originally posted by Chops
      He started copping it when fans like yourself need a scapegoat. The 10 years and 200 games tells you he isn't as bad as many think.
      You mentioned Gia, not me? Seriously have a look at yourself.
      [COLOR="#FF0000"][B]Western Bulldogs:[/B][/COLOR] [COLOR="#0000CD"][B]We exist to win premierships[/B][/COLOR]

      Comment

      • LostDoggy
        WOOF Member
        • Jan 2007
        • 8307

        #33
        Re: Round 4 Discussion

        Originally posted by Greystache
        You mentioned Gia, not me? Seriously have a look at yourself.
        So you are now denying you are one of his boo boys?

        I suppose its easier for you to claim ignorance than say you might be wrong.

        Comment

        • Sedat
          Hall of Fame
          • Sep 2007
          • 11436

          #34
          Re: Round 4 Discussion

          Perhaps Carlton fans might still be pining for that fat bloke with the gambling problem who is struggling to get a kick with his mates in the outer eastern suburbs.

          From memory there was quite a lengthy queue lining up to pot the Dogs for not selecting Henderson at pick 5 in the 2007 ND. Queue not so long now.
          "Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"

          Comment

          • Greystache
            Bulldog Team of the Century
            • Dec 2009
            • 9775

            #35
            Re: Round 4 Discussion

            Originally posted by Chops
            So you are now denying you are one of his boo boys?
            Gia's neither my favourite nor my least liked.

            Originally posted by Chops
            I suppose its easier for you to claim ignorance than say you might be wrong.
            You saying that, that's funny.

            Now have the last word and we'll move on.
            [COLOR="#FF0000"][B]Western Bulldogs:[/B][/COLOR] [COLOR="#0000CD"][B]We exist to win premierships[/B][/COLOR]

            Comment

            • Greystache
              Bulldog Team of the Century
              • Dec 2009
              • 9775

              #36
              Re: Round 4 Discussion

              Originally posted by Sedat
              Perhaps Carlton fans might still be pining for that fat bloke with the gambling problem who is struggling to get a kick with his mates in the outer eastern suburbs.

              From memory there was quite a lengthy queue lining up to pot the Dogs for not selecting Henderson at pick 5 in the 2007 ND. Queue not so long now.
              No doubt that's the crux of the issue. When he was thrown in as the steak knives in the Fevola deal the Carlton supporters looked at his height, weight, the number he was drafted at, and decided he was a like for like replacement. When reality set in their resent toward him has overflowed.

              To see Essendon supporters defending a Carlton player was a strange sight, they even took a breath from their umpire bashing to do it.
              [COLOR="#FF0000"][B]Western Bulldogs:[/B][/COLOR] [COLOR="#0000CD"][B]We exist to win premierships[/B][/COLOR]

              Comment

              • comrade
                Hall of Fame
                • Jun 2008
                • 18093

                #37
                Re: Round 4 Discussion

                Originally posted by Chops
                So you are now denying you are one of his boo boys?

                I suppose its easier for you to claim ignorance than say you might be wrong.
                Originally posted by Greystache
                Gia's neither my favourite nor my least liked.



                You saying that, that's funny.

                Now have the last word and we'll move on.
                Gents, this does get a bit tedious after a while.
                Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.

                Comment

                • The Coon Dog
                  Bulldog Team of the Century
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 7579

                  #38
                  Re: Round 4 Discussion

                  Originally posted by comrade
                  Gents, this does get a bit tedious after a while.
                  I agree.
                  [COLOR="Red"][B][U][COLOR="Blue"]85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse![/COLOR][/U][/B][/COLOR]

                  Comment

                  • LostDoggy
                    WOOF Member
                    • Jan 2007
                    • 8307

                    #39
                    Re: Round 4 Discussion

                    Originally posted by The Coon Dog
                    I agree.
                    I don't.
                    This is better than a soap opera.

                    Comment

                    • Bornadog
                      WOOF Clubhouse Leader
                      • Jan 2007
                      • 67291

                      #40
                      Re: Round 4 Discussion

                      Originally posted by HairyMidget
                      I don't.
                      This is better than a soap opera.
                      Well like Chops, what gets tedious is people bagging Gia.
                      FFC: Established 1883

                      Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

                      Comment

                      • Mofra
                        Hall of Fame
                        • Dec 2006
                        • 15060

                        #41
                        Re: Round 4 Discussion

                        For anyone who watched the Freo game on the weekend, how did they go clearance-wise?

                        Only ask as we've been terrible this year and is an area we need to focus on. If Freo were on fire we could be in some trouble.
                        Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

                        Comment

                        • LostDoggy
                          WOOF Member
                          • Jan 2007
                          • 8307

                          #42
                          Re: Round 4 Discussion

                          Originally posted by Mofra
                          For anyone who watched the Freo game on the weekend, how did they go clearance-wise?

                          Only ask as we've been terrible this year and is an area we need to focus on. If Freo were on fire we could be in some trouble.
                          I havent seen the stats but North were really good in the clearances for majority of the game. Swallow and co seemed to be reading it off Sandilands really well.

                          However when Pavlich went into the guts he just dominated the centre clearances. Especially in the 3rd quarter. We really need a strong body to be with him at the stoppages when his in the middle.

                          North had the better of play in general IMO, just seemed to really fall down around half forward. Whereas Freo's forward line was contantly open and looking dangerous.

                          Comment

                          • Hotdog60
                            Bulldog Team of the Century
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 5962

                            #43
                            Re: Round 4 Discussion

                            Originally posted by Jaytee
                            I havent seen the stats but North were really good in the clearances for majority of the game. Swallow and co seemed to be reading it off Sandilands really well.

                            However when Pavlich went into the guts he just dominated the centre clearances. Especially in the 3rd quarter. We really need a strong body to be with him at the stoppages when his in the middle.

                            North had the better of play in general IMO, just seemed to really fall down around half forward. Whereas Freo's forward line was contantly open and looking dangerous.
                            We'll bring in Big Will as a tagger, that will sort Pav out.
                            Don't piss off old people
                            The older we get the less "LIFE IN PRISON" is a deterrent...

                            Comment

                            Working...