Round 11 discussion

[Desipura]

Re: Round 11 discussion

I'd rather reply to yours, you're good at ignoring facts.

I would like to give you a fact about yourself however its plain obvious for all to see, so I wont.

[LostDoggy]

Re: Round 11 discussion

I would like to give you a fact about yourself however its plain obvious for all to see, so I wont.

Go on

[Desipura]

Re: Round 11 discussion

Go on

You are an egotistical, arrogant, person with strong opinions that likes to have the final say...................



just like me......not to mention passionate bulldogs supporter

[Topdog]

Re: Round 11 discussion

There's as much proof in stats as an opinion.

OK then lets use stats.

Hocking is primarily a negator, Davey is supposed to be an attacking player who sets up general play and attacks.

Yet Hocking has the same amount of disposals (1 more to be precise).
Hocking has more than double the number of tackles (51 to 23)
Hocking has more than double the number of Inside 50's (35 to 15)
Same number of goals.
Same number of goal assists.

Fans thoughts on Davey just before injury.

http://demonology.midnight.net.au/Index.PHP?Mode=Forum&SubMode=DisplayPosts&MessageThreadID=34655&BoardType=0

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showthread.php?t=818232

Post 37 onwards is May 20

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:aDsN4Xbx0VMJ:demonland.com/forums/index.php%3F/topic/26061-aaron-davey/+aaron+davey+dropped&cd=6&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=au&source=www.google.com.au

And Davey's coach?

http://www.melbournefc.com.au/tabid/7415/default.aspx?newsid=114426

Any way your opinion became irrelevant when you said that you haven't watched much of either side. No idea why you would bother arguing something if you don't even watch them.

[comrade]

Re: Round 11 discussion

OK then lets use stats.

Hocking is primarily a negator, Davey is supposed to be an attacking player who sets up general play and attacks.

Yet Hocking has the same amount of disposals (1 more to be precise).
Hocking has more than double the number of tackles (51 to 23)
Hocking has more than double the number of Inside 50's (35 to 15)
Same number of goals.
Same number of goal assists.

Fans thoughts on Davey just before injury.

http://demonology.midnight.net.au/Index.PHP?Mode=Forum&SubMode=DisplayPosts&MessageThreadID=34655&BoardType=0

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showthread.php?t=818232

Post 37 onwards is May 20

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:aDsN4Xbx0VMJ:demonland.com/forums/index.php%3F/topic/26061-aaron-davey/+aaron+davey+dropped&cd=6&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=au&source=www.google.com.au

And Davey's coach?

http://www.melbournefc.com.au/tabid/7415/default.aspx?newsid=114426

Any way your opinion became irrelevant when you said that you haven't watched much of either side. No idea why you would bother arguing something if you don't even watch them.

[Maddog37]

Re: Round 11 discussion

Interesting that Malthouse is all fire and brimstone about cheating one week and then his little pet Daisy claims he was trying to hit the ball when he was watching it two meters away as he hit Jones.

Wonder if Mick will publicly denounce his player for blatantly lying to the review panel.

[LostDoggy]

Re: Round 11 discussion

I must be the only one that would want a creative player over a tagger then. Dont need to watch every minute to know the value of someone like Davey is better than a tagger. Not sure how 8 rounds of form so has made him a better player than a club b&f just a couple of seasons back. Maybe hocking is at his peak has been very good this year and Davey has been poor but Davey is more likely turn it around and maybe win a game for Melb. Not sure hocking or winderlich could do that for Essendon.

[azabob]

Re: Round 11 discussion

Davey 4th b&f and Sylvia(injured in match) 5th b&f were melb top brownlow vote getters. Jamar was AA and 3rd b&f.
Add Grimes, Garland and a stack of young players.

Grimes and Garland are big outs for the dees.

[Topdog]

Re: Round 11 discussion

The stats suggest otherwise Chops

[Sockeye Salmon]

Re: Round 11 discussion

Interesting that Malthouse is all fire and brimstone about cheating one week and then his little pet Daisy claims he was trying to hit the ball when he was watching it two meters away as he hit Jones.

Wonder if Mick will publicly denounce his player for blatantly lying to the review panel.

I don't get this.

Why do the media let Thomas get away with such a blatant lie.



I can hear them now, "a person of the highest integrity"


Call him out. You lied, as of now we can't believe anything you say.

[The Coon Dog]

Re: Round 11 discussion

This thread feels like Groundhog day!

[comrade]

Re: Round 11 discussion

This thread feels like Groundhog day!

[Desipura]

Re: Round 11 discussion

The stats suggest otherwise Chops

Dont you know you only use stats when it supports your argument.

[LostDoggy]

Re: Round 11 discussion

Dont you know you only use stats when it supports your argument.

Not sure why you are getting involved here? You ignore any stats like Gias 5 and the swans final last year. You most likely more unhappy with Gia kicking 5 than us losing by 61.
I used stats anyway like b&f winner

[The Coon Dog]

Re: Round 11 discussion

I'll be glad when round 12 starts!