Struggling clubs 'need $2m each'

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Happy Days
    Hall of Fame
    • May 2008
    • 10009

    #31
    Re: Struggling clubs 'need $2m each'

    Originally posted by Sedat
    I agree with Mark Stevens, who tweeted that is was borderline insulting for the Dogs to be labelled a basket case seeing as we made 3 consecutive PF's in recent history.

    Anyway we won't be hearing much from Ed on this issue in the coming weeks. Needs to remove both feet from his mouth first.
    Originally posted by Happy Days
    "Stuffed it up along the way", isn't that sticking in the craw of anyone else?

    We shot our wad trying to win a premiership in 2010, when Melbourne were still terrible.
    Could just agree with the forum's own!
    - I'm a visionary - Only here to confirm my biases -

    Comment

    • Remi Moses
      WOOF Member
      • Jan 2009
      • 14785

      #32
      Re: Struggling clubs 'need $2m each'

      Bit disappointing, and really patronising and condescending comments from Ed.
      It's silly however that we're paying 95% yet Sydney are 900 over !
      Makes a mockery of the salary cap to be honest.
      Melbourne are Paying 100%
      To be lumped in with them is a bit rich

      Comment

      • anfo27
        WOOF Member
        • Aug 2009
        • 1999

        #33
        Re: Struggling clubs 'need $2m each'

        Originally posted by Remi Moses
        Bit disappointing, and really patronising and condescending comments from Ed.
        It's silly however that we're paying 95% yet Sydney are 900 over !
        Makes a mockery of the salary cap to be honest.
        Melbourne are Paying 100%
        To be lumped in with them is a bit rich



        Agreed. Especially as Melbourne picked up big names like Mitch Clark & Chris Dawes which gave their supporters a reason for optimism.

        Comment

        Working...