St Kilda spurred on by Bulldogs' renewed bark

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bulldogtragic
    The List Manager
    • Jan 2007
    • 34289

    #31
    Re: St Kilda spurred on by Bulldogs' renewed bark

    Originally posted by jeemak
    I commented in the Game Day thread that Hunter had better get a defencive side very quickly. It was clear once he got onto the field he didn't want to get his hands dirty, when that's precisely what he should have been doing. It will see him discarded if he doesn't, irrespective of who his father is.
    Yep. I interpreted his body language as not caring. He was flat footed, not moving to the next contest, not near his opponent and gave us SFA. Personally, I'd drop him from the team next week.
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

    Comment

    • The Bulldogs Bite
      Hall of Fame
      • Dec 2006
      • 11244

      #32
      Re: St Kilda spurred on by Bulldogs' renewed bark

      Originally posted by jeemak
      I commented in the Game Day thread that Hunter had better get a defencive side very quickly. It was clear once he got onto the field he didn't want to get his hands dirty, when that's precisely what he should have been doing. It will see him discarded if he doesn't, irrespective of who his father is.
      Agreed. I said the same thing prior to the game starting, and unfortunately Hunter failed to prove me wrong. I wouldn't play him next week.
      W00F!

      Comment

      Working...