Dogs youngest team in average games played - Round 19

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bornadog
    WOOF Clubhouse Leader
    • Jan 2007
    • 67701

    #1

    Dogs youngest team in average games played - Round 19

    On the weekend we were the youngest team to play in regards to average games played. At just 61.7 average, we were younger than GWS and GC as well as Melbourne, Carlton etc.

    Hawks were the oldest with over 140 average games. Average age wise were still in the bottom 3. This is skewed due to Redpath and Dickson being mature age recruits.

    All season we have been in the bottom three for average games, but this week without Murphy, Minson the average was very low.
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
  • jazzadogs
    Bulldog Team of the Century
    • Oct 2008
    • 5849

    #2
    Re: Dogs youngest team in average games played - Round 19

    Amazing stuff, and something that I still don't think is really being recognised amongst the AFL community. People are starting to catch on, but it's still a lot of 'Bulldogs have an easy draw' etc rather than 'what an amazing effort from the most inexperienced side in the ENTIRE COMPETITION to be sitting fourth after 20 rounds'.

    On a sidenote, where do you get the stats for average age/games played? I've been looking but not able to find it.

    Comment

    • Bornadog
      WOOF Clubhouse Leader
      • Jan 2007
      • 67701

      #3
      Re: Dogs youngest team in average games played - Round 19

      Originally posted by jazzadogs
      Amazing stuff, and something that I still don't think is really being recognised amongst the AFL community. People are starting to catch on, but it's still a lot of 'Bulldogs have an easy draw' etc rather than 'what an amazing effort from the most inexperienced side in the ENTIRE COMPETITION to be sitting fourth after 20 rounds'.

      On a sidenote, where do you get the stats for average age/games played? I've been looking but not able to find it.
      Footywire.com, click on game stats and then scroll down and check the right hand side of the page.

      FFC: Established 1883

      Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

      Comment

      • Greystache
        WOOF Member
        • Dec 2009
        • 9775

        #4
        Re: Dogs youngest team in average games played - Round 19

        James Hird says this is just propaganda.
        [COLOR="#FF0000"][B]Western Bulldogs:[/B][/COLOR] [COLOR="#0000CD"][B]We exist to win premierships[/B][/COLOR]

        Comment

        • azabob
          Hall of Fame
          • Sep 2008
          • 15483

          #5
          Re: Dogs youngest team in average games played - Round 19

          Originally posted by Greystache
          James Hird says this is just propaganda.
          And he is flabbergasted by it all - all of it...
          More of an In Bruges guy?

          Comment

          • Greystache
            WOOF Member
            • Dec 2009
            • 9775

            #6
            Re: Dogs youngest team in average games played - Round 19

            Originally posted by azabob
            And he is flabbergasted by it all - all of it...
            To be honest he just didn't see it coming

            Sorry don't mean to derail. It just makes a mockery of the suggestion you can't win with more than 6 players with less than 50 games. If you have effort, system, and total buy in then it's very possible.
            [COLOR="#FF0000"][B]Western Bulldogs:[/B][/COLOR] [COLOR="#0000CD"][B]We exist to win premierships[/B][/COLOR]

            Comment

            • azabob
              Hall of Fame
              • Sep 2008
              • 15483

              #7
              Re: Dogs youngest team in average games played - Round 19

              Originally posted by Greystache
              To be honest he just didn't see it coming

              Sorry don't mean to derail. It just makes a mockery of the suggestion you can't win with more than 6 players with less than 50 games. If you have effort, system, and total buy in then it's very possible.
              Your not derailing it, your adding context. McCartney also offered the youth excuse last year and I'm sure Roos had trotted it out also.
              More of an In Bruges guy?

              Comment

              • LostDoggy
                WOOF Member
                • Jan 2007
                • 8307

                #8
                Re: Dogs youngest team in average games played - Round 19

                I am sure other clubs, particularly those "rebuilding", will be studying our performance closely. It really is remarkable.

                When a new coach comes in, and you have a strong younger group, a brutal list prune really is the only way.

                If we had've retained Griffen, Higgins, Cooney etc this year, they would've taken a lot of games off our youngsters and our development would have only slowed. These changes were not entirely our choice but they have been a blessing in disguise.

                Even for this year, I can't imagine we would be getting any better results, let alone the positioning for the future.

                It's a great lesson. Once you have confidence in a crop of 19-23 year olds, hand pick a few older leaders and clear the rest out. The more responsibility you put into your kids, the quicker they can deliver.

                Comment

                • always right
                  WOOF Member
                  • Nov 2007
                  • 4189

                  #9
                  Re: Dogs youngest team in average games played - Round 19

                  As supporters many of us we have a habit of loving our players to the point we are totally opposed to offloading them or even consider that it could be a positive. We desparately want them to be successful and think that it's only a matter of time before they come good.

                  Jones and Tutt are a case in point where it's hard to believe a number of us wanted them to stay. Even now I hate seeing Cooney struggle so much at the bombers yet he would have held us back if he had remained with us.

                  I don't know if it's general amongst supporters of all clubs or particular to clubs like ours where in the absence of team success, we latch onto individual players.
                  I thought I was wrong once but I was mistaken.

                  Comment

                  • Missing Dog
                    WOOF Member
                    • Jan 2007
                    • 8501

                    #10
                    Re: Dogs youngest team in average games played - Round 19

                    Originally posted by always right
                    As supporters many of us we have a habit of loving our players to the point we are totally opposed to offloading them or even consider that it could be a positive. We desparately want them to be successful and think that it's only a matter of time before they come good.

                    Jones and Tutt are a case in point where it's hard to believe a number of us wanted them to stay. Even now I hate seeing Cooney struggle so much at the bombers yet he would have held us back if he had remained with us.

                    I don't know if it's general amongst supporters of all clubs or particular to clubs like ours where in the absence of team success, we latch onto individual players.
                    A few years ago, it was said that at Footscray/WB there was a culture of celebrating champion players. Can't remember who said it, but we had more than our share of 300 gamers. And it was a BAD thing for winning premierships.

                    At the time I thought "bullshit", but he was right. Every player every season has to make his case based on his performance, not reputation.

                    Comment

                    • Missing Dog
                      WOOF Member
                      • Jan 2007
                      • 8501

                      #11
                      Re: Dogs youngest team in average games played - Round 19

                      After winning the unwinnable Grand Final against Geelong, Clarkson was asked if he believed this team would win a Grand Final. He said: "No. Its come 2 years earlier than I thought it would"

                      Comment

                      • LostDoggy
                        WOOF Member
                        • Jan 2007
                        • 8307

                        #12
                        Re: Dogs youngest team in average games played - Round 19

                        Originally posted by PeanutsPeanuts
                        I am sure other clubs, particularly those "rebuilding", will be studying our performance closely. It really is remarkable.

                        When a new coach comes in, and you have a strong younger group, a brutal list prune really is the only way.

                        If we had've retained Griffen, Higgins, Cooney etc this year, they would've taken a lot of games off our youngsters and our development would have only slowed. These changes were not entirely our choice but they have been a blessing in disguise.

                        Even for this year, I can't imagine we would be getting any better results, let alone the positioning for the future.

                        It's a great lesson. Once you have confidence in a crop of 19-23 year olds, hand pick a few older leaders and clear the rest out. The more responsibility you put into your kids, the quicker they can deliver.

                        A brutal list prune can be done by all clubs when rebuilding but if they think copying our model will automatically bring results they will probably end up dissapointed more than not. We have drafted and traded in some serious talent in the last three or so years if any club trying to copy fails at the draft table they are in trouble. We really have nailed our picks and if we can back it up again this year it will really top us off.

                        Like you said it is remarkable so far. Just imagine if we had Libba and Clay fit.

                        Comment

                        • chef
                          Hall of Fame
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 14748

                          #13
                          Re: Dogs youngest team in average games played - Round 19

                          Originally posted by Stefcep
                          A few years ago, it was said that at Footscray/WB there was a culture of celebrating champion players. Can't remember who said it, but we had more than our share of 300 gamers. And it was a BAD thing for winning premierships.

                          At the time I thought "bullshit", but he was right. Every player every season has to make his case based on his performance, not reputation.
                          The great Chris Grant.
                          The curse is dead.

                          Comment

                          • LostDoggy
                            WOOF Member
                            • Jan 2007
                            • 8307

                            #14
                            Re: Dogs youngest team in average games played - Round 19

                            Originally posted by always right
                            As supporters many of us we have a habit of loving our players to the point we are totally opposed to offloading them or even consider that it could be a positive. We desparately want them to be successful and think that it's only a matter of time before they come good.

                            Jones and Tutt are a case in point where it's hard to believe a number of us wanted them to stay. Even now I hate seeing Cooney struggle so much at the bombers yet he would have held us back if he had remained with us.

                            I don't know if it's general amongst supporters of all clubs or particular to clubs like ours where in the absence of team success, we latch onto individual players.
                            Yep I'm guilty of it. Totally didn't want Cooney leaving.

                            Comment

                            • Bornadog
                              WOOF Clubhouse Leader
                              • Jan 2007
                              • 67701

                              #15
                              Re: Dogs youngest team in average games played - Round 19

                              Originally posted by Rooner
                              Yep I'm guilty of it. Totally didn't want Cooney leaving.
                              Me too, but after what happened last year, no player is safe in my eyes. Minson goodbye.
                              FFC: Established 1883

                              Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

                              Comment

                              Working...