If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Re: The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016
Originally posted by comrade
I like it but Ameet Bains has said numerous times they want 3 picks inside 30.
Stale mate for mine then. Pick 50 may not even get used. So we are getting nothing anyway.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
Re: The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016
Disapointing result. Worth a lot more than 35 and downgrade of later picks. That's the system though we really couldn't swing anymore our way. It'll do.
Re: The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016
Originally posted by G-Mo77
Disapointing result. Worth a lot more than 35 and downgrade of later picks. That's the system though we really couldn't swing anymore our way. It'll do.
He had a good finals series but struggled to get a game and only got there through injury ..probably would have got delisted if not for his final series . His games were good because we use a group defending system , one out he would struggle, good get in my opinion
Re: The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016
JMac saying we will review what we do with our picks prior to the end of the trade period.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
Re: The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016
Sorry to see him go. Became an important cog for us in defence in the latter part of the season.
Could've been a lot worse i.e Fremantle pushing him into the PSD. With inequities all over the place through trade periods e.g. if Hawthorn can accept losing Franklin on a 9 year $10 million contract, with a pick 19 compensation after winning the premiership , I can live with losing Hamling for 35.
Re: The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016
Originally posted by ledge
He had a good finals series but struggled to get a game and only got there through injury ..probably would have got delisted if not for his final series . His games were good because we use a group defending system , one out he would struggle, good get in my opinion
I don't disagree with you. I had him delisted as well but on the back of that finals series i think he's worth more. We were never going to get it though when we were over a barrel. As I said it'll do.
Re: The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016
I think pick 35 is pretty good for Hamling. Forget the downgrade, I have faith that Dalrymple will get the players he wants for those picks regardless.
If we tried to value Hammer's worth say after the Freo game and before any finals, we would of said delisting value only, no one would of traded for him.
Personally I don't see him being anything more than a serviceable backup until we can find a quality backman, so to get 35 for him I think is a good result.
Let's see how he goes at Freo next year when they are under the pump.
Re: The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016
Not great, not bad. Take it and run, and use 61 to get Cloke and see if either 35 or 43 will grab a player we want.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
Re: The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016
Not a great outcome, but probably the best we could engineer considering the likelihood of him getting to them for nix in the pre-season draft.
I hope our recruiters have long memories and when the opportunity comes to remind Freo why it makes sense to play nice, that we thoroughly eviscerate them in a future trade.
Re: The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016
Bottom line is we got Hamling for SFA, he gave us 23 games in 2 years, including a stellar final series that significantly contributed to a Premiership. He now leaves as an enigma, giving us pick 35 on the way out.
Joel Hamling owes us nothing. He'll be a fascinating footnote in years to come - all the best to him.
Comment