Bankers and Anchors - Round 3 2016

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kruder
    Coaching Staff
    • May 2011
    • 3857

    #61
    Re: Bankers and Anchors - Round 3 2016

    Originally posted by Rocket Science
    Daniel : Enough about his stature. A rolled gold gun and showed it against the best. He's got a Brownlow in him.
    Dahlhaus : Manic, creative and relentless.
    Roughead : Perhaps not in our best three proper but gee he's tracking nicely in the ruck role. Liked his smarts, tap work and timely aggression.

    B:

    Umpiring : Kill me now.
    Umpiring : No seriously.
    Sicily : Possibly the most punchable head in footy.

    Stray observation: after the initial shock and despair over Murph's misfortune, what's left is a searing desire to want to play this mob again. One expects Bev and the group agrees. Next time, we overthrow the king.
    IMO Roughead didn't deserve a game round 1 and was pretty much the last man standing in the ruck devision. His first 3 weeks have been excellent looks mobile, wants the footy and has shown aggression as you say. My one concern like many is his durability partially if Boyd is the relief ruck. Boyd rucking has been good, its just more of a concern with the impact on the forward line if Roughead goes down and he has to play the remainder of the game in the ruck which was looking a chance in the first quarter on Sunday. Its an interesting one for the match committee.

    Comment

    • bulldogtragic
      The List Manager
      • Jan 2007
      • 34289

      #62
      Re: Bankers and Anchors - Round 3 2016

      Originally posted by kruder
      IMO Roughead didn't deserve a game round 1 and was pretty much the last man standing in the ruck devision. His first 3 weeks have been excellent looks mobile, wants the footy and has shown aggression as you say. My one concern like many is his durability partially if Boyd is the relief ruck. Boyd rucking has been good, its just more of a concern with the impact on the forward line if Roughead goes down and he has to play the remainder of the game in the ruck which was looking a chance in the first quarter on Sunday. Its an interesting one for the match committee.
      Great point, I forgot to mention it too. If Roughy gets injured we a) have to ruck Boyd all game, bad & b) we lose Boyd as our full forward, also bad. We need another tall forward who can also ruck, which rules Redpath out. So this year it's Campbell. Even a cheap recycle like Bellchambers could be worth a shot next year to take Minson's spot.
      Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

      Comment

      • 1eyedog
        Hall of Fame
        • Mar 2008
        • 13235

        #63
        Re: Bankers and Anchors - Round 3 2016

        Just in regards to Jake I didn't think too deeply about the affect the absence of Crameri is having on him, but I think it is.
        But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.

        Comment

        • azabob
          Hall of Fame
          • Sep 2008
          • 15307

          #64
          Re: Bankers and Anchors - Round 3 2016

          Originally posted by 1eyedog
          Just in regards to Jake I didn't think too deeply about the affect the absence of Crameri is having on him, but I think it is.
          And Dickson also.
          More of an In Bruges guy?

          Comment

          • Rocket Science
            Coaching Staff
            • Oct 2007
            • 4852

            #65
            Re: Bankers and Anchors - Round 3 2016

            Indeed. With defenders (understandably) hyper-conscious of Stringer, that's where Dickson and Crameri can chime in and slice teams up. A pity about the latter but to state the obvious the sooner Dickson resumes his spot the better, for our sake and Jake's.
            BORDERLINE FLYING

            Comment

            Working...