Match Committee - Round 16 2016 vs Richmond
Collapse
X
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 2016 vs Richmond
I think we made the right call with Minson. He is a liability outside of the ruck. Really need the 'vibe' to right so we can play the only guy who fits the 2nd ruck role.Comment
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 2016 vs Richmond
I think Bevo is still looking for our best forward option so we can score more heavily. He has gone from 3 big ruck/ forwards to 2 throughout this season. His favourite seems to be the 2 big guys, even though it hasn't been successful in certain matches this year, as he keeps reverting to it. Time will tell if he is right.I think in the weeks ahead it will be the Roughy/Boyd combo he will settle on.Comment
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 2016 vs Richmond
... contest. Gives nothing other than the ability to win a hit out & the odd clearance.
Unfortunatley the game has moved past Will and his body doesn't allow him to be effective.. It would be a step backwards if he was to play deep into this season.Comment
-
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.Comment
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 2016 vs Richmond
Looks like we are going to try to run them off their feet. We've obviously judged that their talls aren't good enough to bother shutting down so we might as well hurt them going the other way. Even with short opponents I don't really fear Griffiths and McBean getting ontop of us. JJ and Wood are both particularly valuable with this tactic for they both are good in the air but elite in running it out of a forwardline, especially a slow one.I should leave it alone but you're not rightComment
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 2016 vs Richmond
Is Tom Boyd THE VIBE now? It's a good nickname!You don't develop courage by being happy in your relationships every day. You develop it by surviving difficult times and challenging adversity. ― EpicurusComment
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 2016 vs Richmond
The Vibe! I love it!
Picking up some good vibrations...Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 2016 vs Richmond
As funny as this is, might he share second ruck duties, a la what happened last year against Freo?
Only this time instead of battling Sandilands it will be... Hampson.
I would back Jong to outruck both Hampson and Liam McBean.Comment
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 2016 vs Richmond
Hampson is actually a good tap ruckman. He isn't much of a player overall - but his actual ruck contest stuff is ok.Comment
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 2016 vs Richmond
Disappointed to see us go with one tall ruck man in Roughead. This would have been the ideal game to play Tom Boyd who needs senior games to prepare him for our finals games.Comment
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 2016 vs Richmond
Agreed, Redpath is okay for a few minutes but Boyd is the far better part time ruck option. Bevo does mind to gamble with our rucks though.Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"Comment
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 16 2016 vs Richmond
I agree with dropping Minson. Our issue is we only have 1 legit modern 2nd ruck and whether it's official or not, he is suspended.
With rotations, everyone needs to spend about 80% TOG. Minson/Campbell/Roughy all struggle up forward. Roughy is better around the ground but it is still as a ruck. Basically playing two of them = 60-65% TOG up forward where they are a liability.
I much prefer having a Redpath/Jong/inanimate object offering ruck relief for 15-20% TOG than Minson up forward for 60-65%. It is not a gamble/risk, it just makes sense.Comment
Comment