Michael Hurley

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Remi Moses
    WOOF Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 14785

    Re: Michael Hurley

    " They have to think about the past, and think about the future"
    I think we're in the game

    Comment

    • SlimPickens
      Coaching Staff
      • Aug 2010
      • 2929

      Re: Michael Hurley

      Originally posted by Remi Moses
      " They have to think about the past, and think about the future"
      I think we're in the game
      Brilliant line.
      "Loves a scrap....oh yeah & he's a pretty handy footballer as well"

      Comment

      • Bornadog
        WOOF Clubhouse Leader
        • Jan 2007
        • 66828

        Re: Michael Hurley

        Matthew Lloyd in Sunday Age this morning stressing how important Hurley is to Essendon and how he must stay blah blah blah.

        Will be interesting to see what happens.
        FFC: Established 1883

        Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

        Comment

        • bulldogtragic
          The List Manager
          • Jan 2007
          • 34289

          Re: Michael Hurley

          Originally posted by bornadog
          Matthew Lloyd in Sunday Age this morning stressing how important Hurley is to Essendon and how he must stay blah blah blah.

          Will be interesting to see what happens.
          Smells like desperation.
          Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

          Comment

          • Twodogs
            Moderator
            • Nov 2006
            • 27656

            Re: Michael Hurley

            Originally posted by bornadog
            Matthew Lloyd in Sunday Age this morning stressing how important Hurley is to Essendon and how he must stay blah blah blah.

            Will be interesting to see what happens.
            He is more important to us. He could be the difference between us being a premiership team or losing a prelim. He might stop a ten goal loss into a seven goal loss for them.

            Tell Lloyd to keep his opinions to himself or we will send Steven Kretiuk around to punch his hand every now and then.
            They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

            Comment

            • Remi Moses
              WOOF Member
              • Jan 2009
              • 14785

              Re: Michael Hurley

              Smacks of hoping he stays more than anything .
              They were spruiking about an announcement pre Brisbane game, and still nothing.
              I thought it was odd they made it public that they'd put an offer up for him. It felt like they were trying to show their supporters they're trying to keep him.

              Comment

              • The Underdog
                Bulldog Team of the Century
                • Aug 2007
                • 6879

                Re: Michael Hurley

                Maybe it's just my Bulldog conditioning but I'm pretty sure all the talk of Hurley and Cloke turns into Dawes and Litherland by October...
                Park that car
                Drop that phone
                Sleep on the floor
                Dream about me

                Comment

                • Rocco Jones
                  Bulldog Team of the Century
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 6932

                  Re: Michael Hurley

                  Originally posted by The Underdog
                  Maybe it's just my Bulldog conditioning but I'm pretty sure all the talk of Hurley and Cloke turns into Dawes and Litherland by October...
                  Dawes/Cloke= not much difference IMO. They both aren't great but beat Hamling up forward.

                  Comment

                  • Twodogs
                    Moderator
                    • Nov 2006
                    • 27656

                    Re: Michael Hurley

                    Originally posted by Rocco Jones
                    Dawes/Cloke= not much difference IMO. They both aren't great but beat Hamling up forward.

                    The difference between Cloke and Dawes is about 500k a year I reckon.
                    They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

                    Comment

                    • GVGjr
                      Moderator
                      • Nov 2006
                      • 44702

                      Re: Michael Hurley

                      To get Hurley we would need to give up a good player and I'm guessing our first round draft pick.

                      Which players would be in the mix (Kobe Stevens aside) to sweeten the deal?
                      Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

                      Comment

                      • bulldogtragic
                        The List Manager
                        • Jan 2007
                        • 34289

                        Re: Michael Hurley

                        Originally posted by GVGjr
                        To get Hurley we would need to give up a good player and I'm guessing our first round draft pick.

                        Which players would be in the mix (Kobe Stevens aside) to sweeten the deal?
                        If we won't pull the free agency trigger at the start, and we end up with pick 11 or 12 then I'd offer that with Jong (Essendon & Collingwood can work out something) or threaten that we will pull free agency on them. If they offered to pay his salary, then I'd consider thinking about increasing the offer. But Kobe is in the list management conversation so I'm not too sure why we can include him in the conversation.
                        Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

                        Comment

                        • GVGjr
                          Moderator
                          • Nov 2006
                          • 44702

                          Re: Michael Hurley

                          Originally posted by bulldogtragic
                          If we won't pull the free agency trigger at the start, and we end up with pick 11 or 12 then I'd offer that with Jong (Essendon & Collingwood can work out something) or threaten that we will pull free agency on them. If they offered to pay his salary, then I'd consider thinking about increasing the offer. But Kobe is in the list management conversation so I'm not too sure why we can include him in the conversation.
                          Apologies for trying to broaden the discussion.
                          Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

                          Comment

                          • chef
                            Hall of Fame
                            • Nov 2008
                            • 14633

                            Re: Michael Hurley

                            Our first pick and HC is what I'd offer(if HC was interested).

                            But i think Essendon will be after one of our better players though, its going to be a hard trade to arrange.
                            The curse is dead.

                            Comment

                            • bulldogtragic
                              The List Manager
                              • Jan 2007
                              • 34289

                              Re: Michael Hurley

                              Originally posted by GVGjr
                              Apologies for trying to broaden the discussion.
                              No apology needed. He's probably our best out of contract player, so it goes without saying that if they wanted a good mature contested footy winning player (esp. If Watson doesn't come back) that he might be on their radar, or on another clubs radar and it ends up being a three way trade. Some have said the rumours are Campbell & Smith, but both have big question marks that make me question why Dodoro would consider them ample compensation with our first rounder. I think the crucial thing is what number our first rounder is, and whether we are prepared to put a metaphorical gun to their head in the form of pulling free agency status. Frankly, I think we should threaten it in negotiations when they start with demanding Bonts & Stringer & our first rounder. I know it will piss the AFEL off, but I see no reason to why we can't go the free agency route as the law in the area is solidly in the favour of Hurley's contract being at an end.
                              Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

                              Comment

                              • Mantis
                                Hall of Fame
                                • Apr 2007
                                • 15472

                                Re: Michael Hurley

                                Originally posted by chef

                                But i think Essendon will be after one of our better players though, its going to be a hard trade to arrange.
                                Knowing how Ess have traded in the past I'd think they'd be after our first pick + a top 10 player on our list.

                                It really comes down to what Hurley wants and if he definitely wants out Ess should do the right thing by him and help him get to his club of choice.

                                Comment

                                Working...