The Board Convo

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bulldogtragic
    The List Manager
    • Jan 2007
    • 34289

    The Board Convo

    Reading that Susan Alberti had to step away from the board after reaching her maximum 4 terms, does anyone know the by-laws about whether Peter Gordon can serve only four in total (his last stint, and current stint) or whether he can serve four in a row during this stint?
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
  • Twodogs
    Moderator
    • Nov 2006
    • 27654

    #2
    Re: The Board Convo

    Maybe the president is ex-gratia to the board. I think that's the term, it means that the chairman isn't subject to the sa,e rules that govern the rest of the board.
    They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

    Comment

    • bulldogtragic
      The List Manager
      • Jan 2007
      • 34289

      #3
      Re: The Board Convo

      Originally posted by Twodogs
      Maybe the president is ex-gratia to the board. I think that's the term, it means that the chairman isn't subject to the sa,e rules that govern the rest of the board.
      The Vladimir Putin rule.
      Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

      Comment

      • Bornadog
        WOOF Clubhouse Leader
        • Jan 2007
        • 66702

        #4
        Re: The Board Convo

        The actual number is 3 stints, but an amendment was made for Sue to extend. She mentioned she could have stayed more with another amendment.
        FFC: Established 1883

        Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

        Comment

        • KT31
          Bulldog Team of the Century
          • Jul 2008
          • 5454

          #5
          Re: The Board Convo

          Originally posted by bulldogtragic
          Reading that Susan Alberti had to step away from the board after reaching her maximum 4 terms, does anyone know the by-laws about whether Peter Gordon can serve only four in total (his last stint, and current stint) or whether he can serve four in a row during this stint?
          It was mentioned there was scope to amend the constitution so Susan could stay on for another term, this may apply to the Presidency also.
          It's better to die on our feet than live on our knees.

          Comment

          • bulldogtragic
            The List Manager
            • Jan 2007
            • 34289

            #6
            Re: The Board Convo

            Originally posted by bornadog
            The actual number is 3 stints, but an amendment was made for Sue to extend. She mentioned she could have stayed more with another amendment.
            Originally posted by KT31
            It was mentioned there was scope to amend the constitution so Susan could stay on for another term, this may apply to the Presidency also.
            Personalities, success, donations and individuals aside... What point is the constitution if you can change it whenever you want on a rotating basis? Why not remove term limits all together and then it's no longer an issue for Peter or anyone else deemed worthy of a longer stint on the board.
            Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

            Comment

            • KT31
              Bulldog Team of the Century
              • Jul 2008
              • 5454

              #7
              Re: The Board Convo

              Originally posted by bulldogtragic
              Personalities, success, donations and individuals aside... What point is the constitution if you can change it whenever you want on a rotating basis? Why not remove term limits all together and then it's no longer an issue for Peter or anyone else deemed worthy of a longer stint on the board.
              Its a fair point and something I was wondering earlier BT.
              It's better to die on our feet than live on our knees.

              Comment

              • bulldogtragic
                The List Manager
                • Jan 2007
                • 34289

                #8
                Re: The Board Convo

                On the flip side to Susan leaving the board (Grant & Kent too this year), is there an obvious replacement?

                Paul Dimmattina has long said he wanted on. Luke Darcy might throw his hat in. Are there high profile business folks sniffing for a spot. Perhaps a WOOF member?
                Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

                Comment

                • Bornadog
                  WOOF Clubhouse Leader
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 66702

                  #9
                  Re: The Board Convo

                  Originally posted by bulldogtragic
                  On the flip side to Susan leaving the board (Grant & Kent too this year), is there an obvious replacement?

                  Paul Dimmattina has long said he wanted on. Luke Darcy might throw his hat in. Are there high profile business folks sniffing for a spot. Perhaps a WOOF member?
                  Happy to put my hand up
                  FFC: Established 1883

                  Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

                  Comment

                  • Greystache
                    Bulldog Team of the Century
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 9775

                    #10
                    Re: The Board Convo

                    Originally posted by bulldogtragic
                    On the flip side to Susan leaving the board (Grant & Kent too this year), is there an obvious replacement?

                    Paul Dimmattina has long said he wanted on. Luke Darcy might throw his hat in. Are there high profile business folks sniffing for a spot. Perhaps a WOOF member?
                    Please BT. The nicest way I could put it is the Dimmatina's are full of shit.

                    Neither Paul or his Dad do anything that isn't exclusively for their own benefit. For all their talk they've given nothing back to either Richmond or the Bulldogs and have sucked out massive amounts of free advertising for their business interests in the process, often at the expense of bad publicity for the club itself.
                    [COLOR="#FF0000"][B]Western Bulldogs:[/B][/COLOR] [COLOR="#0000CD"][B]We exist to win premierships[/B][/COLOR]

                    Comment

                    • bulldogtragic
                      The List Manager
                      • Jan 2007
                      • 34289

                      #11
                      Re: The Board Convo

                      Originally posted by Greystache
                      Please BT. The nicest way I could put it is the Dimmatina's are full of shit.

                      Neither Paul or his Dad do anything that isn't exclusively for their own benefit. For all their talk they've given nothing back to either Richmond or the Bulldogs and have sucked out massive amounts of free advertising for their business interests in the process, often at the expense of bad publicity for the club itself.
                      I didn't say I wanted him on the board in a million years. But only that every time there's a vacancy he says he wants on. Unless his son Kai comes on in his junior footy career, I'm happy to leave him in the past as just a former player.
                      Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

                      Comment

                      • Greystache
                        Bulldog Team of the Century
                        • Dec 2009
                        • 9775

                        #12
                        Re: The Board Convo

                        Originally posted by bulldogtragic
                        I didn't say I wanted him on the board in a million years. But only that every time there's a vacancy he says he wants on. Unless his son Kai comes on in his junior footy career, I'm happy to leave him in the past as just a former player.
                        I'd personally just prefer we gave him the Stephen Dank treatment and treat his bullshit as nothing more than attention seeking.
                        [COLOR="#FF0000"][B]Western Bulldogs:[/B][/COLOR] [COLOR="#0000CD"][B]We exist to win premierships[/B][/COLOR]

                        Comment

                        • bulldogtragic
                          The List Manager
                          • Jan 2007
                          • 34289

                          #13
                          Re: The Board Convo

                          Originally posted by Greystache
                          I'd personally just prefer we gave him the Stephen Dank treatment and treat his bullshit as nothing more than attention seeking.
                          Isn't that what the club does? From memory his last attempt fizzled even quicker than the last Richmond challenge.
                          Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

                          Comment

                          • Greystache
                            Bulldog Team of the Century
                            • Dec 2009
                            • 9775

                            #14
                            Re: The Board Convo

                            Originally posted by bulldogtragic
                            Isn't that what the club does? From memory his last attempt fizzled even quicker than the last Richmond challenge.
                            The club yes, but fans and the media take him seriously and the momentum behind it builds until it reaches the put up or shut up point and he slinks away again.

                            I remember when his old man was agitating all over the media that Richmond needed to sack Terry Wallace and that he'd personally pay out the contract for the good of the club if it meant getting rid of him. The Richmond board publicly said that the financial cost of the payout was a factor but if Dimatina would cover it then it was something they'd look at. He immediately went into hiding.
                            [COLOR="#FF0000"][B]Western Bulldogs:[/B][/COLOR] [COLOR="#0000CD"][B]We exist to win premierships[/B][/COLOR]

                            Comment

                            • Topdog
                              Bulldog Team of the Century
                              • Jan 2007
                              • 7471

                              #15
                              Re: The Board Convo

                              Originally posted by bulldogtragic
                              Personalities, success, donations and individuals aside... What point is the constitution if you can change it whenever you want on a rotating basis? Why not remove term limits all together and then it's no longer an issue for Peter or anyone else deemed worthy of a longer stint on the board.
                              Yes fully agreed. Rules are rules for a reason

                              Comment

                              Working...