Analyse this......

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hujsh
    Hall of Fame
    • Nov 2007
    • 11841

    #16
    Re: Analyse this......

    To be fair

    He did say it was hard to think of players who were important last year who improved this year and then worked through the B&F top 10.

    The likes of Dale, Williams, Jong and Mclean (though he was good in the GWS game) were not exactly our most important players last year
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    Comment

    • soupman
      Bulldog Team of the Century
      • Nov 2007
      • 5113

      #17
      Re: Analyse this......

      It's a fairly accurate article to be fair. Sure it doesn't mention our improvers but as it states none of our key players from our successful 2016 qualify. All the players that have noticeably improved were fringe types last year and they are overwhelmingly outnumbered by underperforming senior players.

      We deserve to be bagged out for this year, we have been crap. If there is an article about who has improved I would expect to see the likes of Mclean, Dale, Cordy all given attention but if it's an article about how we have failed to live up to expectations then none of them have been so good as to warrant mention.

      Edit. Hujsh I think we are in agreeance.
      I should leave it alone but you're not right

      Comment

      • Bulldog4life
        WOOF Member
        • Oct 2007
        • 9607

        #18
        Re: Analyse this......

        Originally posted by hujsh
        To be fair

        He did say it was hard to think of players who were important last year who improved this year and then worked through the B&F top 10.

        The likes of Dale, Williams, Jong and Mclean (though he was good in the GWS game) were not exactly our most important players last year
        Yes agree hjush.

        Comment

        • Ozza
          Bulldog Team of the Century
          • Mar 2008
          • 6401

          #19
          Re: Analyse this......

          Its very easy to nitpick at the one or two players not mentioned in the article - but not overly productive for the conversation.

          I think it is a pretty solid comparison of the difference between last season's performances and this seasons - from both an individual and team perspective.

          The scores conceded is of particular interest to me. Are we conceding more points now because the backline has been unsettled & inexperienced at times and less able to intercept mark with Wood being given different roles due to lack of personnel? Or is it that our midfield and team defence is not as fanatical this season - thereby giving the opposition better quality entries?

          At the other end of the ground - I would like to know how often the opposition are marking the ball inside our 50 compared to last year. Although we have generally been taller, I doubt that Cloke and Redpath (when they have played) have necessarily been better at creating ground balls by competing in the air, then perhaps Cordy and Boyd were able to late in the year.

          Comment

          • Twodogs
            Moderator
            • Nov 2006
            • 27655

            #20
            Re: Analyse this......

            Originally posted by Ozza
            Its very easy to nitpick at the one or two players not mentioned in the article - but not overly productive for the conversation.

            I think it is a pretty solid comparison of the difference between last season's performances and this seasons - from both an individual and team perspective.

            The scores conceded is of particular interest to me. Are we conceding more points now because the backline has been unsettled & inexperienced at times and less able to intercept mark with Wood being given different roles due to lack of personnel? Or is it that our midfield and team defence is not as fanatical this season - thereby giving the opposition better quality entries?

            At the other end of the ground - I would like to know how often the opposition are marking the ball inside our 50 compared to last year. Although we have generally been taller, I doubt that Cloke and Redpath (when they have played) have necessarily been better at creating ground balls by competing in the air, then perhaps Cordy and Boyd were able to late in the year.
            We've missed Cordy's tackling and attack on the ball in attack too.

            Not so much the moustache though
            They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

            Comment

            • Sedat
              Hall of Fame
              • Sep 2007
              • 11248

              #21
              Re: Analyse this......

              Originally posted by Ozza
              Its very easy to nitpick at the one or two players not mentioned in the article - but not overly productive for the conversation.

              I think it is a pretty solid comparison of the difference between last season's performances and this seasons - from both an individual and team perspective.

              The scores conceded is of particular interest to me. Are we conceding more points now because the backline has been unsettled & inexperienced at times and less able to intercept mark with Wood being given different roles due to lack of personnel? Or is it that our midfield and team defence is not as fanatical this season - thereby giving the opposition better quality entries?
              Bit of column A and column B. Our defensive stocks have been depleted all season but our inability to provide defensive cover from our mids by way of winning clearances, CP's and the territorial battle has contributed to our points conceded blowing out this season.
              "Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"

              Comment

              Working...