What to do, with Stew?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bornadog
    WOOF Clubhouse Leader
    • Jan 2007
    • 66742

    Re: What to do, with Stew?

    Originally posted by Ghost Dog
    I'm 42 and I don't earn nearly as much as that!
    He is an elite athlete
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

    Comment

    • Twodogs
      Moderator
      • Nov 2006
      • 27655

      Re: What to do, with Stew?

      Originally posted by bornadog
      $75,000 per annum - not a lot of money for a 29 year old.

      That's his base rate, he gets extra for every senior game he plays. It's up to him and his dedication to football as to whether he earns 75k or much more if he has a big preseason and plays his way into their AFL team. New rules next year as wel. Clubs can promote rookies straight into the senior team without dropping another player off the list. It's much easier to play rookies than it was.
      They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

      Comment

      • Bornadog
        WOOF Clubhouse Leader
        • Jan 2007
        • 66742

        Re: What to do, with Stew?

        Originally posted by Twodogs
        New rules next year as wel. Clubs can promote rookies straight into the senior team without dropping another player off the list. It's much easier to play rookies than it was.
        When is a rookie not a rookie - next year.

        I think the AFL needs to scrap the words Rookie
        FFC: Established 1883

        Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

        Comment

        • Twodogs
          Moderator
          • Nov 2006
          • 27655

          Re: What to do, with Stew?

          Originally posted by bornadog
          When is a rookie not a rookie - next year.

          I think the AFL needs to scrap the words Rookie
          Give them a couple of years and they might. They just have to catch up with the consequences part of their equation-they aren't real good at seeing them sometimes.
          They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

          Comment

          • Hotdog60
            Bulldog Team of the Century
            • Aug 2009
            • 5908

            Re: What to do, with Stew?

            Maybe Rookie can be replaced with Auxiliary players then age and experience doesn't cloud the title.
            Don't piss off old people
            The older we get the less "LIFE IN PRISON" is a deterrent...

            Comment

            • Twodogs
              Moderator
              • Nov 2006
              • 27655

              Re: What to do, with Stew?

              Originally posted by Hotdog60
              Maybe Rookie can be replaced with Auxiliary players then age and experience doesn't cloud the title.
              It is a bit of a misnomer isn't it?
              They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

              Comment

              • Bornadog
                WOOF Clubhouse Leader
                • Jan 2007
                • 66742

                Re: What to do, with Stew?

                To me a rookie should be a player that has never played AFL before. A player that was overlooked in the draft, or a mature age recruit playing in a state league but hasn't had the opportunity to play AFL. The recycled players were in the past picked up in the pre-season draft. The AFL has lost the plot with the rookie classification.
                FFC: Established 1883

                Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

                Comment

                • Twodogs
                  Moderator
                  • Nov 2006
                  • 27655

                  Re: What to do, with Stew?

                  Originally posted by bornadog
                  To me a rookie should be a player that has never played AFL before. A player that was overlooked in the draft, or a mature age recruit playing in a state league but hasn't had the opportunity to play AFL. The recycled players were in the past picked up in the pre-season draft. The AFL has lost the plot with the rookie classification.

                  That's what it started out as. The rookie list players had all sorts of limitations about age and background originally. I think it's worked much better since they made it more flexible.
                  They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

                  Comment

                  • jeemak
                    Bulldog Legend
                    • Oct 2010
                    • 21836

                    Re: What to do, with Stew?

                    Supplementary players?

                    If Stu plays ten or so games he's probably going to take home the median household income as a single earner, most 29 y.o. wouldn't be doing that, nor would they be getting the best medical, dental, and other health opportunities AFL football provides.

                    Also, playing AFL football provides networking capability other professions don't. Dickhead or otherwise, there will be plenty of people willing to give Stu a decent paying job after he finishes playing football.
                    TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.

                    Comment

                    Working...