I have to admit, once the Wilkie discussions ended I've been pretty disinterested in Trade Week. I guess upon reflection our 'DREAMS' were:
#1 - Game changing mid (aka Butters)
#2 - "best of breed" key back (Wilkie)
#3 - Small defender (Budarick)
#4 - 'Extra' mid with a speed endurance type running capacity (Robertson, Knevitt).
Without trying to over analyse everything I've read and heard, that seems to have been the dream scenario. To that you then add:
Draft #1: 1st round pick (who I'm guessing will be a mid with attacking skills)
Draft #2: Darcy
Full-stop.
When you look at that top list with a 1/4 success rate, I kind of understand the angst around the whole "the club isn't doing enough" commentary I'm reading, but if you go through it:
1/. Game Changing Mid
Look at what's happening with in-contract Zac Merrett. If the club doesn't want to release him, well...they don't have too. I totally understand the "Get Butters Now" lobby but he just has never seemed to be the guy who would come out and say "I demand you trade me now". And if he wasn't gonna do that (which I guess is part of his personality people love) then Port weren't gonna trade him. He's their best player, they have a new coach and they need to sell memberships too.
2/. Key back.
This is hard. I think we had a good shake at Wilkie and Silvagni but missed out. With Silvagni it seemed financial, with Wilkie he seemed to want to stay with his mates at the Saints. What can you do? I get the whole "do it earlier" lobby - cool. But remember the last time you read about an in-contract player adding another 2-years to his deal in the middle of a season? Why do you think he did that? Cos another club went to his manager with an offer...the manager went to his current club and "Hey Presto - Here's a good news story social media"...I understand the whole "Get someone else" argument but if what we've already got is as good as 'someone else' - guys like Butts, Aleer, Young - I mean...how many tall backs do Footscray need to trot out there each week?
3/. Small defender.
Got Budarick. Cool. Probably paid overs for an un-contracted player but the deal is done so....cool.
4/. Speed Endurance Mid
I mean - we had a good crack at Robertson but he's just been sitting behind Neale, McCluggage et al and the thought of coming to the Dogs who have Bont, Richards, Libber was just too hard a sell. Knevitt I'm surprised at but again - if you cant get a game ahead of Jhye Clarke are you getting one over Matt Kennedy??
The key to me (obviously) is the development of Busslinger, JOD, Hynes and Dolan.
If that all goes 'to plan' - it's gonna be fine. If we hit a speed bump though,...
What do you guys think? Have we stuffed it up or just tried to play the odds?
#1 - Game changing mid (aka Butters)
#2 - "best of breed" key back (Wilkie)
#3 - Small defender (Budarick)
#4 - 'Extra' mid with a speed endurance type running capacity (Robertson, Knevitt).
Without trying to over analyse everything I've read and heard, that seems to have been the dream scenario. To that you then add:
Draft #1: 1st round pick (who I'm guessing will be a mid with attacking skills)
Draft #2: Darcy
Full-stop.
When you look at that top list with a 1/4 success rate, I kind of understand the angst around the whole "the club isn't doing enough" commentary I'm reading, but if you go through it:
1/. Game Changing Mid
Look at what's happening with in-contract Zac Merrett. If the club doesn't want to release him, well...they don't have too. I totally understand the "Get Butters Now" lobby but he just has never seemed to be the guy who would come out and say "I demand you trade me now". And if he wasn't gonna do that (which I guess is part of his personality people love) then Port weren't gonna trade him. He's their best player, they have a new coach and they need to sell memberships too.
2/. Key back.
This is hard. I think we had a good shake at Wilkie and Silvagni but missed out. With Silvagni it seemed financial, with Wilkie he seemed to want to stay with his mates at the Saints. What can you do? I get the whole "do it earlier" lobby - cool. But remember the last time you read about an in-contract player adding another 2-years to his deal in the middle of a season? Why do you think he did that? Cos another club went to his manager with an offer...the manager went to his current club and "Hey Presto - Here's a good news story social media"...I understand the whole "Get someone else" argument but if what we've already got is as good as 'someone else' - guys like Butts, Aleer, Young - I mean...how many tall backs do Footscray need to trot out there each week?
3/. Small defender.
Got Budarick. Cool. Probably paid overs for an un-contracted player but the deal is done so....cool.
4/. Speed Endurance Mid
I mean - we had a good crack at Robertson but he's just been sitting behind Neale, McCluggage et al and the thought of coming to the Dogs who have Bont, Richards, Libber was just too hard a sell. Knevitt I'm surprised at but again - if you cant get a game ahead of Jhye Clarke are you getting one over Matt Kennedy??
The key to me (obviously) is the development of Busslinger, JOD, Hynes and Dolan.
If that all goes 'to plan' - it's gonna be fine. If we hit a speed bump though,...
What do you guys think? Have we stuffed it up or just tried to play the odds?
Comment