I have seen and heard a bit of commentary over the last 12-months or so about the way the Saints/coaches have modelled their recruiting and game-style on the Tigers.
- Repeat sprint enough runners on the flanks/wings (Billings et al compared with the Lambert gang).
- Consistent mids who have a defend first mentality (Ross and team, Cotchin etc)
- Key backs who play position over opposition (Howard is the 'Rance' of the Saints).
- Forward structure built around 2x keys - one for the 'lead' (King/Lynch) and one for the contest (Membrey/Jack).
The question I have is:
- Does anyone believe in this commentary?
- If they do, does it mean we are in TROUBLE? Or are we 'all good' having learned a great lesson a couple of weeks back.
- Repeat sprint enough runners on the flanks/wings (Billings et al compared with the Lambert gang).
- Consistent mids who have a defend first mentality (Ross and team, Cotchin etc)
- Key backs who play position over opposition (Howard is the 'Rance' of the Saints).
- Forward structure built around 2x keys - one for the 'lead' (King/Lynch) and one for the contest (Membrey/Jack).
The question I have is:
- Does anyone believe in this commentary?
- If they do, does it mean we are in TROUBLE? Or are we 'all good' having learned a great lesson a couple of weeks back.
Comment