Re: The roles of Cross & Boyd
If we would stop turning the ball over on the half-fowrward line (or worse, through the centre) with poor disposal and some even poorer decision making, I think things would be a lot, lot, lot better.
Midfield players have to work both ways in order for us to play effective footy - both Boyd and Cross will win their share of it and provide some link-up running...as WELL as covering an opponent. But it has gotten to the stage where even Gilbee is unable to meet the 'hit water when falling out of boat' challenge and we are being slaughtered on the turnover.
All that said, I still think we would be better off with Boyd playing back in the Callan/Addison role and Callan/Addison used as depth only...the reason is that they simply turn it over/kick to 50-50's far too often. Cross is a bit slow but also a bit too 'see ball-get ball' to play in the back half long term. Having Boyd there would address my main issue with our structure - with Lake, Morris and Callan all in the back half, that is 3 players who I dont trust with the footy and puts enormous pressure on Gilbee and Shaggy to do all the delivery of the footy out of there. To me, Boyd could fill the breach and make us a stronger side. 1-2 stints through the midfield per half should keep him happy enough...
If we would stop turning the ball over on the half-fowrward line (or worse, through the centre) with poor disposal and some even poorer decision making, I think things would be a lot, lot, lot better.
Midfield players have to work both ways in order for us to play effective footy - both Boyd and Cross will win their share of it and provide some link-up running...as WELL as covering an opponent. But it has gotten to the stage where even Gilbee is unable to meet the 'hit water when falling out of boat' challenge and we are being slaughtered on the turnover.
All that said, I still think we would be better off with Boyd playing back in the Callan/Addison role and Callan/Addison used as depth only...the reason is that they simply turn it over/kick to 50-50's far too often. Cross is a bit slow but also a bit too 'see ball-get ball' to play in the back half long term. Having Boyd there would address my main issue with our structure - with Lake, Morris and Callan all in the back half, that is 3 players who I dont trust with the footy and puts enormous pressure on Gilbee and Shaggy to do all the delivery of the footy out of there. To me, Boyd could fill the breach and make us a stronger side. 1-2 stints through the midfield per half should keep him happy enough...
Comment