How successful will Bruce be playing Back

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mantis
    Hall of Fame
    • Apr 2007
    • 15321

    #16
    Re: How successful will Bruce be playing Back

    Originally posted by SonofScray
    It’s a credit to him that he is prepared to risk his spot and take on a challenge in an area of need for us. Somewhat forced into it, by circumstance, but he could have just settled for getting edged out.
    I would think we have equal cover at both ends of the ground so perhaps Bruce in training with the defensive group is brought up to speed so he can fill the role, but think he’s ‘next in line’ at both ends…. Or perhaps needed more as a forward if there is form or injury issues with Naughton, Lobb or JUH.

    Comment

    • F'scary
      WOOF Member
      • Dec 2011
      • 4089

      #17
      Re: How successful will Bruce be playing Back

      Like Gollum, Brucey may yet have a role to play. Jones is a bit of an unknown quantity right now. Keith had a bad season last year. Darcy is still developing and may be best suited as a ruck or ruck/forward in a year or two. After that it is Gardner supported by inexperienced third tall types and slow burn bus driver.
      Officially on the Bus-wagon

      Comment

      • Mofra
        Hall of Fame
        • Dec 2006
        • 14868

        #18
        Re: How successful will Bruce be playing Back

        Right now Jones & Gardner are ahead of Bruce as KPDs, and I don't think Bruce plays an interceptor role so that's Keath and Darcy ahead of him in that role too - with Khamis/O'Brien arguably stiff competition for that one spot too.

        Jones has had 18 months out of the game so there's every chance Bruce gets games this year but it may not be too many.
        I suspect we may consider one of Keath or Bruce for a 1 year extension next year if either play more than a handful of games
        Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

        Comment

        • soupman
          Bulldog Team of the Century
          • Nov 2007
          • 5091

          #19
          Re: How successful will Bruce be playing Back

          I'm pretty sceptical about him succeeding there, interestingly for many of the reasons i didn't think Jones would be a good defender.

          Think he lacks finesse with his marking, i bad at ground level, and is sloppy by foot, all things Jones had as limitations. Obviously making the switch much older but a chance i guess of making it, although I don't know if i see him being a better option than a fit version of any of Keath, Gardner, Jones or Darcy.
          I should leave it alone but you're not right

          Comment

          • Missing Dog
            WOOF Member
            • Jan 2007
            • 8501

            #20
            Re: How successful will Bruce be playing Back

            Love Bruce's enthusiasm but its not enough. His after injury comeback was a huge fail. I think he's too slow to trouble good forwards and poor at ground level. Sadly I think he'll only be a spare back/forward after Khamis and even a fit O'brien. Sweet a better stand in ruck too. Could be Bruce's last year.

            Comment

            • GVGjr
              Moderator
              • Nov 2006
              • 44292

              #21
              Re: How successful will Bruce be playing Back

              Originally posted by Matjoh
              Love Bruce's enthusiasm but its not enough. His after injury comeback was a huge fail. I think he's too slow to trouble good forwards and poor at ground level. Sadly I think he'll only be a spare back/forward after Khamis and even a fit O'brien. Sweet a better stand in ruck too. Could be Bruce's last year.
              I tend to agree but the main challenge for him as a defender is his decision making and his kicking. He's poor on his opposite foot and it takes a while for him to get the ball too his boot. Now as experienced as he is he might be able to make the adjustment but as a defender he might struggle.
              Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

              Comment

              • Missing Dog
                WOOF Member
                • Jan 2007
                • 8501

                #22
                Re: How successful will Bruce be playing Back

                I’m a fan of this move. Bruce was drafted to GWS as a key defender, and was picked up by StKilda to play down back as well. I reckon this puts pressure on Keith, and pushes out Gardener. I’ll put it out there that come round one, Jones and Bruce will be out two key defenders, maybe Gardener as a third tall if required, and Keith will be in the Magoos.

                Comment

                • GVGjr
                  Moderator
                  • Nov 2006
                  • 44292

                  #23
                  Re: How successful will Bruce be playing Back

                  Originally posted by AutoFill
                  I’m a fan of this move. Bruce was drafted to GWS as a key defender, and was picked up by StKilda to play down back as well. I reckon this puts pressure on Keith, and pushes out Gardener. I’ll put it out there that come round one, Jones and Bruce will be out two key defenders, maybe Gardener as a third tall if required, and Keith will be in the Magoos.
                  He's got a bit of work to do to force his way in but at least we will have plenty of depth. He will play a few roles for us this year.
                  Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

                  Comment

                  • Bornadog
                    WOOF Clubhouse Leader
                    • Jan 2007
                    • 66106

                    #24
                    Re: How successful will Bruce be playing Back

                    Originally posted by AutoFill
                    I’m a fan of this move. Bruce was drafted to GWS as a key defender, and was picked up by StKilda to play down back as well. I reckon this puts pressure on Keith, and pushes out Gardener. I’ll put it out there that come round one, Jones and Bruce will be out two key defenders, maybe Gardener as a third tall if required, and Keith will be in the Magoos.
                    I think Gardner is a lock for best 22
                    FFC: Established 1883

                    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

                    Comment

                    • 1eyedog
                      Hall of Fame
                      • Mar 2008
                      • 13187

                      #25
                      Re: How successful will Bruce be playing Back

                      Originally posted by bornadog
                      I think Gardner is a lock for best 22
                      No doubt. Him and Jones and then we have decisions to make.

                      My preference is that Keath gets first crack at an intercepting role. Keath or Darcy
                      But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.

                      Comment

                      • RedWhite&Blue

                        #26
                        Re: How successful will Bruce be playing Back

                        He looks extremely fit and has lost the weight to lessen the strain on his knee.
                        In full flight Bruce is a better forward than Lobb but the question remains if he can capture that 2021 form.
                        As a backman Bruce is an unknown quantity and he's only a warm body in the ruck.
                        I think it is easier for a forward to go back rather than the other way around so I'm backing Bruce in to make it work.
                        Fingers crossed.

                        Comment

                        • Guest

                          #27
                          Re: How successful will Bruce be playing Back

                          Think he should be a depth forward, basically Lobb replacement who never plays 22.

                          Comment

                          • muzzyahoy
                            WOOF Member
                            • Feb 2023
                            • 21

                            #28
                            Re: How successful will Bruce be playing Back

                            I think he lacks lateral movement and agility, but moves real well north south, which to me are more forward traits. Like a few others have mentioned, i think he suits more as a backup forward to younger options. I think he will play a similar role within the group to what Schache did last year, just be better at it. I wouldn't chance playing him back personally.

                            Comment

                            • Grantysghost
                              Bouncing Strong
                              • Apr 2010
                              • 18898

                              #29
                              Re: How successful will Bruce be playing Back

                              Originally posted by muzzyahoy
                              I think he lacks lateral movement and agility, but moves real well north south, which to me are more forward traits. Like a few others have mentioned, i think he suits more as a backup forward to younger options. I think he will play a similar role within the group to what Schache did last year, just be better at it. I wouldn't chance playing him back personally.
                              This makes a lot of sense. Welcome aboard mate. I'm a raptors fan too, well was the year we had Kawhi so I'm really a fair weather supporter.
                              Keep one eye on them.
                              BT COME BACK!​

                              Comment

                              • Bulldog4life
                                WOOF Member
                                • Oct 2007
                                • 9607

                                #30
                                Re: How successful will Bruce be playing Back

                                Originally posted by Mantis
                                I would think we have equal cover at both ends of the ground so perhaps Bruce in training with the defensive group is brought up to speed so he can fill the role, but think he’s ‘next in line’ at both ends…. Or perhaps needed more as a forward if there is form or injury issues with Naughton, Lobb or JUH.
                                Yep all makes sense.

                                Comment

                                Working...