Always Right Match Committee Round 17 v Collingwood

[Bulldog Joe]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 17 v Collingwood

I’m surprised Scott is the sub.

Perhaps they are hoping for late game impact like West provided last week.

[jeemak]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 17 v Collingwood

Scott being sub probably also talks to the faith they have in Vandermeer.

[The Bulldogs Bite]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 17 v Collingwood

Scott being sub probably also talks to the faith they have in Vandermeer.

I'm surprised McNeil is still in but perhaps we're mindful of Collingwood's speed and have tried to load up in this area.

I would have strongly considered Baker for this game and told him to hold width as he was earlier in the year, but his form really did drop off.

Scott had a strong month or so a while ago but I've thought he hasn't given us enough for the last month so I don't mind him as the sub, but I'm not sure how many more chances we can give McNeil.

Without watching the VFL, I wonder if Arty was considered too.

[Bumper Bulldogs]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 17 v Collingwood

Really keen to be on the bid stage Friday night against the ladder leaders. I honestly think this side is good enough to get an upset this week. Bevo will be doing his thing and getting the boys up for this one.

I love West in the starting 22 and after last week it?s purely up to him now to make a fist of it.

[EasternWest]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 17 v Collingwood

Really keen to be on the bid stage Friday night against the ladder leaders. I honestly think this side is good enough to get an upset this week. Bevo will be doing his thing and getting the boys up for this one.

I love West in the starting 22 and after last week it?s purely up to him now to make a fist of it.

Good post BB. I would argue that if we play as well as Collingwood has been playing then it wouldn't even be an upset win (yes I know that's what an upset win really means, but you get what I'm saying.)

[Bumper Bulldogs]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 17 v Collingwood

Good post BB. I would argue that if we play as well as Collingwood has been playing then it wouldn't even be an upset win (yes I know that's what an upset win really means, but you get what I'm saying.)

I get it but just sit back and enjoy a tough arm wrestle all night. It’s gonna be a heart stopper but a good win to put the fear of life back into the competition that we are back and back in a big way. This is when Bevo is at his best.

[Bornadog]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 17 v Collingwood

Really keen to be on the bid stage Friday night against the ladder leaders. I honestly think this side is good enough to get an upset this week. Bevo will be doing his thing and getting the boys up for this one.

I love West in the starting 22 and after last week it?s purely up to him now to make a fist of it.

I hope he does well but I am not a fan and still doubt him.

[kruder]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 17 v Collingwood

How early do people think we would need to get to the ground to lock in a GA seat tomorrow night? I'm guessing at least an hr?

[kruder]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 17 v Collingwood

I hope he does well but I am not a fan and still doubt him.

When Westy does the basics and takes first option he is a solid AFL player. I know it's not as simple as that but If I was coaching him it would be all I would be preaching.

[Bornadog]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 17 v Collingwood

When Westy does the basics and takes first option he is a solid AFL player. I know it's not as simple as that but If I was coaching him it would be all I would be preaching.

He does show a bit but he is very inconsistent.

[jeemak]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 17 v Collingwood

I'm surprised McNeil is still in but perhaps we're mindful of Collingwood's speed and have tried to load up in this area.

I would have strongly considered Baker for this game and told him to hold width as he was earlier in the year, but his form really did drop off.

Scott had a strong month or so a while ago but I've thought he hasn't given us enough for the last month so I don't mind him as the sub, but I'm not sure how many more chances we can give McNeil.

Without watching the VFL, I wonder if Arty was considered too.

Interestingly with McNeil I thought on watching the replay he was pretty good early and then finished some work late. There was a play in the middle of the game where I referred to an effort where he over-ran the football as McShit, but outside of that he was probably OK on the eye. However, he barely got his hands on it.

[jeemak]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 17 v Collingwood

How early do people think we would need to get to the ground to lock in a GA seat tomorrow night? I'm guessing at least an hr?

Are you not there already?

[Grantysghost]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 17 v Collingwood

Are you not there already?

There's a couple of spots left in G's tent if anyone can get down to Marvel quickly.

We have a small camp fire next to Thor's hammer.

Bring marshmallows!

[Axe Man]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 17 v Collingwood

Without watching the VFL, I wonder if Arty was considered too.

He had 6 possessions in a win against the bottom team so it would have been hard to justify.

[Jeanette54]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 17 v Collingwood

I?m surprised Scott is the sub.

Perhaps Bevo has a role in mind, for which he judges McNeil is more suited.