WOOF Update
Collapse
X
-
Comment
-
More of an In Bruges guy?Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: WOOF Update
Just my observation re: lack of engagement from new members..
Countless times now I?ve seen random users comment on threads, and receive minimal / no replies from other users, which can?t help with user retention. There?s probably an element of responsibility on existing users to engage in conversation with ?strangers? as much as longer term posters.
I know I?ve posted on various threads in the past with no response, and would?ve been happy to have long, back and forth conversations but instead resorted to Reddit/BigfootyComment
-
Re: WOOF Update
Just my observation re: lack of engagement from new members..
Countless times now I?ve seen random users comment on threads, and receive minimal / no replies from other users, which can?t help with user retention. There?s probably an element of responsibility on existing users to engage in conversation with ?strangers? as much as longer term posters.
I know I?ve posted on various threads in the past with no response, and would?ve been happy to have long, back and forth conversations but instead resorted to Reddit/Bigfooty
As a new poster myself I am conscious that I don't have any relevant experience or expertise behind anything I might say, whereas I think in your case, if you use the same name on Bigfooty, always have some very interesting points of view and start some good conversations.
I do enjoy reading the long term poster's views on here though, and am sure they will be interested in your perspectives. So please perservere.Comment
-
Re: WOOF Update
Just my observation re: lack of engagement from new members..
Countless times now I?ve seen random users comment on threads, and receive minimal / no replies from other users, which can?t help with user retention. There?s probably an element of responsibility on existing users to engage in conversation with ?strangers? as much as longer term posters.
I know I?ve posted on various threads in the past with no response, and would?ve been happy to have long, back and forth conversations but instead resorted to Reddit/Bigfooty
I've been around here for a long time, and still I really have no idea as to how much administration and maintenance is required much less the actual monetary costs incurred by Gary are for WOOF.
I have little to add as to how to grow involvement that hasn't already been articulated by others, but I do know that were WOOF to shut down it would be a genuine loss to me and the relatively small but dedicated posters that make this place such a great online community.
As much as I relish a larger contributing Bulldog contingent here; it would enhance and potentially make this a more vibrant community than it already is, I'm even more invested in contributing towards solution that at the very least enables what we have now to continue going forward.
I do know that I for one would be more than willing to pay a subscription as well as take on any tasks that might make it more tenable to Gary to continue with a small site. I'm sure I wouldn't the only one either.Comment
-
Re: WOOF Update
Just my observation re: lack of engagement from new members..
Countless times now I?ve seen random users comment on threads, and receive minimal / no replies from other users, which can?t help with user retention. There?s probably an element of responsibility on existing users to engage in conversation with ?strangers? as much as longer term posters.
I know I?ve posted on various threads in the past with no response, and would?ve been happy to have long, back and forth conversations but instead resorted to Reddit/Bigfooty
If 5 long term members reply for eg that's a great feeling for a new member and will certainly make them feel part of the community and not someone trying to interrupt a private chat group.BT COME BACK!
Comment
Comment