Charles Sutton Medal 2024

[jeemak]

Re: Charles Sutton Medal 2024

Plus Naughton missed 6 games

Played twenty, but was benched early in two. I looked at what happens to votes per game at 18 full games and he stays at eighth, at 8.17 votes.

[Axe Man]

Re: Charles Sutton Medal 2024

Lobb polled unbelievably well when you consider more than one third of his games were as a forward where he wouldn't have attracted many votes, apart from the second Freo game.

[jazzadogs]

Re: Charles Sutton Medal 2024

Thanks Axe. I've had a look at votes per game, tells an interesting story:

Rank Player Votes Games Votes/ Game
1 Bontempelli 314 24 13.08
2 Treloar 245 23 10.65
3 Dale 245 24 10.21
4 Lobb 163 16 10.19
5 Jones 203 21 9.67
6 Liberatore 170 18 9.44
7 Richards 188 21 8.95
8 Naughton 147 20 7.35
9 Weightman 122 17 7.18
10 Bramble 168 24 7.00
11 Duryea 152 22 6.91
12 Williams 161 24 6.71
13 English 150 23 6.52
14 Khamis 108 17 6.35
15 Ugle-Hagan 138 22 6.27
16 Darcy 123 21 5.86
17 McNeil 70 12 5.83
18 West 111 21 5.29
19 O'Donnell 63 14 4.50
20 Vandermeer 84 24 3.50


Sorry for the formatting.

I think it shows why we're after players who can play that high half forward role, in that those we had running through there didn't feature highly with Daniel and Macrae not registering in the top twenty vote getters.

Naughton in the top ten, someone tell Kano. Lobb really cashed in after his switch to defence.

With a voting system that is 5 coaches assigning 0-5 to each player in each game, they're actually pretty low averages per game - unless we have changed the format?

[Rocco Jones]

Re: Charles Sutton Medal 2024

With a voting system that is 5 coaches assigning 0-5 to each player in each game, they're actually pretty low averages per game - unless we have changed the format?

It's certainly 0-5 x 5 coaches per game.

The votes read as if you 1 vote = 5 or 6 out of 10 level game. Anything below average/passable = 0.

[jazzadogs]

Re: Charles Sutton Medal 2024

Yeh that makes sense in terms of the results we're seeing. But doesn't REALLY make sense...don't have a 0-5 scale if 0 actually represents 0-5/10!! Just have a 0-10 scale!