Has time caught up with older players faster than we thought?

[Dry Rot]

Perhaps they were all carrying injuries, but it looked to me that time has caught up with Johnno, Aker, Welsh, Hudson and Eagleton for the last half of the season.

What can we expect from them next season?

[bulldogtragic]

Re: Has time caught up with older players faster than we thought?

Johno is looking very average for me.

Aker has at most two years.

Welsh and Eagleton maybe one more.

Interesting times for trading.

[Topdog]

Re: Has time caught up with older players faster than we thought?

Johnno to fight back.
Aker to play well in his last year.
Welsh to be playing for Willi.
Hudson probably needs more rest next year. He was still great last week and is by no means too old.
Eagleton is a scapegoat. Good depth player and no where near our worst last night.

Am I alone in thinking that Aker was good last night. Ablett was no where near Geelongs best.

[Missing Dog]

Re: Has time caught up with older players faster than we thought?

I think Johno has been carrying an injury most of the last half of the year better in a smaller role next year
aker ever since Darwin he has not been the same player will be better next year
Ego the game has cought up to him goodbye
Welsh still kicked forty and job done in and out next year i feel

[Missing Dog]

Re: Has time caught up with older players faster than we thought?

Johnno to fight back.
Aker to play well in his last year.
Welsh to be playing for Willi.
Hudson probably needs more rest next year. He was still great last week and is by no means too old.
Eagleton is a scapegoat. Good depth player and no where near our worst last night.

Am I alone in thinking that Aker was good last night. Ablett was no where near Geelongs best.

Aker was good but we needed a little more up forward last night and right on the mark with Hudson he looked tired last night

[G-Mo77]

Re: Has time caught up with older players faster than we thought?

I thought Johhno had a real ordinary couple of games but put together some good games and was one of our better players towards the end of the year same with Aker. When your that good anything less seems "Average"

Welsh was ordinary all finals unfortunatly, Hudson wasn't great either but he still has a lot to give.

Eagleton is frustrating but will probably kick on for another year.

[Dry Rot]

Re: Has time caught up with older players faster than we thought?

To me, they all seem to be decline, and therefore logically their 2009 seasons will be worse than 2008.

[cinder]

Re: Has time caught up with older players faster than we thought?

The thing was Johnno is, he's obviously got a few niggling injuries and is just wrecked after such a full on season, but the point is he's out there and he's playing, and he always no matter what gives his absolute all.
Full credit to him, he's such a courageous player and inspirational captain. Happy for him to play on as long as he likes.

[Mofra]

Re: Has time caught up with older players faster than we thought?

I think Welsh is on borrowed time. He has been terrible for two months except for the Swans game, and offered us nothing during the finals we can hang our hat on.

He'd want a big pre-season, even if Skipper is earmarked as purely a back-up ruckman. J.Grant may find himself as a skinny, barely developed FF for 22 H&A games next year plus finals given our lack of alternatives.

[Topdog]

Re: Has time caught up with older players faster than we thought?

To me, they all seem to be decline, and therefore logically their 2009 seasons will be worse than 2008.

Wouldn't many have said the same about Aker last year?

[Dry Rot]

Re: Has time caught up with older players faster than we thought?

Wouldn't many have said the same about Aker last year?

Yes, but he was injured. IMO we've seen his best in Dog's colours this season.

Time has affected the pace of Eagleton, Acker and Johnno, and this won't improve next year.

[Rocket Science]

Re: Has time caught up with older players faster than we thought?

Eagleton is a scapegoat.

Scapegoat you say?

This is an exerpt from the 2008 AFL Prospectus, which is admittedly written from somewhat of a fantasy perspective, but is still highly illuminating:

"Eagleton remains one of the most outside players in the competition, winning fewer than 20% of his possessions in a contest for the 2nd season in a row. He averaged more than 20 disposals for the first time in his career, however his kicking which is perceived as very good, let him down. At his peak in 2003 he hit the target an elite 87% of the time, however since then it has been on a steady decline, hitting an all-time low of 73% in 2007 - a disappointing result considering how much of his footy is won uncontested.

For the 4th season in a row he led the Dogs for inside-50's, however the team retained possession only 51% of the time from an Eagleton inside-50 - 7% below the Dogs' average and ranked as the 5th worst amongst Bulldogs to have more than 10 inside-50's. His 27 clanger kicks were the 2nd most at the club and equal 15th most in the competition. Another feature of his game that looks to be on the wane is his impact on the scoreboard. His 13 goals in 2007 was his lowest tally since 2002."


One year on, what's changed exactly?

This isn't about the result last night, this is big picture stuff, and likewise isn't about the man, or his character...This also isn't about a crook game or quarter here and there, this purely about what he does and doesn't contribute to the on-field endeavours of this football club. Eagleton routinely registers performances that would see a kid banished back to the VFL, yet we persist, and persist.

He is a bona fide, 24 carat, rolled gold liability as a footballer and if we're fair dinkum about making greater strides he simply has to go, or be prepared to see out his time strictly as an emergency call-up. Quality sides don't, and can't for that matter, carry passengers. That goes for Nathan Eagleton just as much as it goes for Peter Street.

Thank god we've got the likes of Ward, Reid and O'Keefe coming on.

[Bulldog Revolution]

Re: Has time caught up with older players faster than we thought?

Yes, but he was injured. IMO we've seen his best in Dog's colours this season.

Time has affected the pace of Eagleton, Acker and Johnno, and this won't improve next year.

Whilst we are judging all those players I think its worth noting that they all play far less central roles in our team than many others. And while doing that Johnson and Aker still kicked almost 100 goals between them.

Johson was far less the main focus up forward and Aker accepted defensive roles when that was what the team needed from him. These two are champions of the game and should not be too quickly dismissed.

We need to plan our way forward in the cold light of day - but we have a VFL prelim to win today and we need to focus on that

[Topdog]

Re: Has time caught up with older players faster than we thought?

Scapegoat you say?

This is an exerpt from the 2008 AFL Prospectus, which is admittedly written from somewhat of a fantasy perspective, but is still highly illuminating:

"Eagleton remains one of the most outside players in the competition, winning fewer than 20% of his possessions in a contest for the 2nd season in a row. He averaged more than 20 disposals for the first time in his career, however his kicking which is perceived as very good, let him down. At his peak in 2003 he hit the target an elite 87% of the time, however since then it has been on a steady decline, hitting an all-time low of 73% in 2007 - a disappointing result considering how much of his footy is won uncontested.

For the 4th season in a row he led the Dogs for inside-50's, however the team retained possession only 51% of the time from an Eagleton inside-50 - 7% below the Dogs' average and ranked as the 5th worst amongst Bulldogs to have more than 10 inside-50's. His 27 clanger kicks were the 2nd most at the club and equal 15th most in the competition. Another feature of his game that looks to be on the wane is his impact on the scoreboard. His 13 goals in 2007 was his lowest tally since 2002."


One year on, what's changed exactly?

This isn't about the result last night, this is big picture stuff, and likewise isn't about the man, or his character...This also isn't about a crook game or quarter here and there, this purely about what he does and doesn't contribute to the on-field endeavours of this football club. Eagleton routinely registers performances that would see a kid banished back to the VFL, yet we persist, and persist.

He is a bona fide, 24 carat, rolled gold liability as a footballer and if we're fair dinkum about making greater strides he simply has to go, or be prepared to see out his time strictly as an emergency call-up. Quality sides don't, and can't for that matter, carry passengers. That goes for Nathan Eagleton just as much as it goes for Peter Street.

Thank god we've got the likes of Ward, Reid and O'Keefe coming on.

So you agree with me, he is a good depth player.

[LostDoggy]

Re: Has time caught up with older players faster than we thought?

won't have any of it...all senior players with exception of Eagleton should go on!! Westy deserves to run around until he says he's had enough!! Champs go out on thier terms!!