If Grant was 10 years younger ...

[Sockeye Salmon]

... where would you play him the current side?

I've always thought Grant was a very good CHF, but the best CHB I've ever seen.

[The Bulldogs Bite]

Re: If Grant was 10 years younger ...

CHB - no doubt about it.

[southerncross]

Re: If Grant was 10 years younger ...

... where would you play him the current side?

I've always thought Grant was a very good CHF, but the best CHB I've ever seen.

I'm with you about him being a great CHB. Could be a very good forward in either key position but his ability to hit targets would be very good for the team.

[Max469]

Re: If Grant was 10 years younger ...

If Chris was 10 years younger I would be very happy because he would still be around for another 10 years.

Seriously - CHB

[Bornadog]

Re: If Grant was 10 years younger ...

I would still play him at CHF, he has been fantastic in the position and its probably the most difficult position to play on the ground. CHB there are lots of easy kicks to be gained and with Grants ability, he would be waisted in that role.

[alwaysadog]

Re: If Grant was 10 years younger ...

Both CHF and CHB but mostly organising the attack. There would be a stream of flags if we could add a tall as good as Chris was 10 years ago. Those who would play him solely at CHB should look at some of his 1997/8 games.

[Go_Dogs]

Re: If Grant was 10 years younger ...

I'd have him playing as a utility - everywhere. Filling holes, running through the centre square, everything.

[bulldogtragic]

Re: If Grant was 10 years younger ...

If he were ten years younger he would have been recruited at age 6.

Would have been a great effort.