If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Utter disgrace. 72-28 at half time was a fairer representation of the game.
Turnovers, no forward defence pressure, poor disposal by hand and foot and we lost most of the contested ball. Poor delivery to the forwards (memo to midfielders: kicking the ball into Minson's ankles when he leads isn't really useful)
Hill and Griffen were good, and the little ground and the sense of immediacy made over two hours of driving into some strange lands worthwhile.
Lucky for the final score the Swans put on a whole of rookies in the third quarter.
Hi DR, can you expand on this. Where did he play, ruck or CHB? What was OK about him, ball skills, pace, reading the play? How much game time did he get?
The Angels have the phone box. [SIZE="2"]Don't blink![/SIZE]
Hi DR, can you expand on this. Where did he play, ruck or CHB? What was OK about him, ball skills, pace, reading the play? How much game time did he get?
Down back, on Hall at times. Seemed to Ok in a defensive sense, didn't really see him do much counterattacking/rebound stuff. Covered his man reasonably well, punching the ball away etc. I was up one end and difficult to see the play at the other end. Best guess he played in total somewhere between a quarter or two.
Comment